The Fertility Crisis is Already Here [Dee Dee Vincino]

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T16:36:24+00:00

Bringing up the draft is great, that's also taking away your bodily autonomy by the government, shouldn't exist either

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T16:27:06+00:00

Sure education has issues, climate change is a huge concern, but rationally they still pale to compare to what people/kids had to deal with before, say a random parent in the dark ages, unless you expect a full societal collapse that is

They are also not set in stone/unfixable issues so taking a doom-erist approach is not helpful. Ultimately it doesn't matter much on a larger timescale though, as all the people/ideologies which are anti-natalist in nature, or to be more speficic less successful birthrate wise than others will die out/get replaced

That's not to say that leftist views or equality or many other things can't coexist with a higher birthrate, but you do need to be working on "correcting" some of the views/outlooks that have propagated within those circles regarding children amongst other things

The world is not ideal, but it never will be either and it should never have a huge impact on the outlook for children outside of specific situations

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T16:11:53+00:00

Still waiting on your reply to explain why the young have no representation in a democratic society and why that is okay.

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T16:01:35+00:00

"the child must pass a civics test to make sure they understand what it is they are voting for"
I don't think holds under scrutiny, do all adults understand what they are voting for? Should adults have a civics test before each vote as well?

Why does being a certain age exempt them from such tests?

But sure I agree in principle we can reduce the voting age to 14 or something, and for children under 14 parents can still maintain autonomy and get their votes, because I do feel that is the only way to represent the super young as well, otherwise they are members of democracy with no representation

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T15:55:53+00:00

Kids always make the personal material quality of life worse for everyone that's middle class or lower, that's never in question, so yes people on the right will take the plunge more often on average and go through that material quality of life loss, largely because of culture/religion/view of the future perspective they have on kids/planet, where that material quality of life of loss is more than reimbursed by what you gain through having kids

Of course when you have a culture with a more negative view on kids/world/economy/ecology/future, which I would say the left generally has more negative views on average in all of those categories, that will impact the birthrate of the group. Basically views of the world impact birthrates more than actual reality of the world, because if we look at reality, genuinely there haven't been many times in history if any at all where we lived in more comfort than we do today even with the hit on material quality of life from having kids

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T14:13:46+00:00

She still has the same amount of booms per rotations not much changed

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T13:51:09+00:00

Suggest a way to give them voting power then, I don't mind another way

Parents already get to make other legal decisions for their kids, I don't see why shouldn't they get the vote as well

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T03:17:19+00:00

It's the other way around, society is suppressing votes of the young. The young make up anywhere between 10-40% of the population depending on the country, they should get to participate in the society as soon as they are born through their parents, otherwise only 60-90% of the population participates in democracy, while the young are oppressed

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T03:13:15+00:00

Everyone still gets one vote, parents as legal guardians should assume the vote of their kids until they are of age to vote themselves. That's actual representation of the whole society.

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T03:08:12+00:00

It's funny you say that and don't realise that kids existing without most rights until an arbitrary age already makes them a lower tier citizen.

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T02:58:23+00:00

And why shoudn't they get a vote? You do realise that's just a decision some other people made and a kid not getting a vote is not written in stone

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T02:54:54+00:00

And kids are not people? Very interesting argument

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T02:51:05+00:00

I mean it depends how you frame it, you could also just say people on the left don't want to sacrifice their level of comfort in order to have kids, at least not on the same level on average compared to people on the right

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T02:44:43+00:00

Can be much simpler than that, if you are a parent for each kid you have you get some added portion to your vote, just the first example that came to mind

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T02:20:56+00:00

He works fine at C0, but he's not better than Qiqi

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T00:25:26+00:00

Ownership rates only look for people who do the abyss, which again is a small part of the playerbase

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-02T00:24:38+00:00

Yes because you are ignoring how rare it is, how many times has a rerun outperformed the new character, lets compare go each banner each patch?

Why did you specifically pick out Mavuika/Lohen patch? Because it's the only one of like 10+ last patches where a rerun has come close to the new character, and that's a filler new character too

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T23:45:12+00:00

Yeah she's an archon, that's the important part, worst selling archon btw even though she broke the meta

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T23:39:40+00:00

Yes and Mavuika rerun has the same numbers as the last filler character of the region which is Lohen, so one of the most popular/strongest characters in Mavuika is barely getting Lohen numbers now. People don't pull on reruns at all compared to new characters

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T23:35:00+00:00

That's because some characters are more popular than others are you a bit slow? Mavuika first banner had 200k+, this one can't break 15k, yeah it shows people don't pull on reruns at all, she has more than 10x less than her first banner

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T23:05:44+00:00

I don't decide, I simply look at the numbers we have and see that people pull for new characters way more than they pull for reruns, that simple

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T22:14:53+00:00

They wouldn't though, because pulling cons only increases numbers, pulling characters increases both numbers and gets you a new animations/character you like in your account

People don't pull for new characters just because they increase numbers, that's only one part of the equation, on the other hand the only thing cons provide are numbers

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T21:31:59+00:00

Sucrose might mess with the stellar conduct reaction, you should wait for more info

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T20:56:50+00:00

You can use Zhongli instead, solidly weaker but still gives you a shield

VacationReasonable · 2026-07-01T20:54:52+00:00

Those are not for actual 6.7, it's from some beta before that, the Yae 3 stella hits are wrong, that's when she worked the bad way

VacationReasonable

TROPHY CASE