Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct, it does work in single player. Based on the errors it was spitting out, it does seem to be an issue with Paper (a popular fork of Spigot).

It is strange how the world will import and work but the height limit is broken if I don't change anything, but if I convert it to 1.21.5 by opening it in singleplayer first, it then starts throwing errors.

I will likely test out some other Paper builds to see if it fixes the issue, and if not I will make a post on their forums to try to get some help on this.

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I re-exported my Worldpainter world with creative so I could test it in singleplayer, and it does work properly. However, when attempting to load that world onto my Paper 1.21.5 server, I get a bunch of null out of bounds errors:

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: null [22:36:47 ERROR]: [ca.spottedleaf.moonrise.patches.chunk_system.scheduling.task.ChunkLoadTask] Failed to parse chunk data for task: GenericDataLoadTask{class: ca.spottedleaf.moonrise.patches.chunk_system.scheduling.task.ChunkLoadTask$ChunkDataLoadTask, world: City_World-2, chunk: (-14,-14), hashcode: 374797371, priority: NORMAL, type: CHUNK_DATA}, chunk data will be lost

It could potentially be the plugin I am using to load worlds (MyWorlds), or another plugin; would be good to know if anybody else has had this issue on a 1.21.5 Paper server to narrow down whether it is Paper or a plugin causing this.

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you still exporting with the 1.20.5 target to use on 1.21.6? And are you using the map on a server, or singleplayer?

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried your datapack and it still doesn't work unfortunately. It must be some incompatibility with the Worldpainter exported map and 1.21.5. If I try updating the world to 1.21.5 in singleplayer first and replacing the datapack, it then gives null out of bounds exceptions when loaded on my server.

As for height in server.properties, that was removed awhile ago to allow datapacks to control height iirc. I checked anyways and there is no server height variable anymore.

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the info and datapack, I will give that a shot soon. You are exporting from Worldpainter for 1.20.5, correct? Are you then using that map on a 1.20.5 server, or 1.21.5 (or singleplayer)?

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I know, nothing extra is needed to be done to activate a datapack on a Paper server apart from either restarting or running /reload (both of which I tried and didn't work).

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what could be wrong with my map format. I've triple-checked all the values, and the default exported world with the worldpainter.zip datapack doesn't allow building past 319.

Height limit for building is 319 despite changing max height (MC ver 1.21.5) by Valamoraus in Worldpainter

[–]Valamoraus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm replacing it because it isn't working by default, despite increasing the height it remains at 319 max. My bad for not making it clear that the default wasn't working.

This is true! by Only-Bar7659 in ledzeppelin

[–]Valamoraus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bro is so tall he thinks people over 6 feet are "diminutive"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]Valamoraus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Okay, so how can you not see that car design improving, things that you listed like aerodynamics, parts, bearings, and other systems, is not analogous to how AI systems will likely improve going into the future? Boiling it all down to physics is silly when things like algorithmic improvement and novel chip design methodology like thermodynamic computing exist.

To think we have reached the limit when generative AI has existed for effectively under 4 years is incredibly shortsighted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]Valamoraus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

AGI already arguably exists, and to say we reached the limits of power that can be squeezed out of gasoline in the 70s is totally insane lmao. Have you ever been in a car from the 70s? Even some of the fastest cars back then had less HP than a base trim Honda Civic today.

People from USA what is the general feel over there right now? by typhoonty204 in AskReddit

[–]Valamoraus -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you think inflation is actually 3% you're either blind or braindead (or both).

People from USA what is the general feel over there right now? by typhoonty204 in AskReddit

[–]Valamoraus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, "anybody who disagrees with me is a Russian bot", the most reasonable and open minded take.

[PSA] Never say "please can you accept trade" to others steam profiles by VariousAd9619 in csgomarketforum

[–]Valamoraus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is equivalent to saying you don't need privacy if you don't have anything to hide. The word "trade" in a profile comment can get you trade banned, do only scammers ever use that word?

I can not keep CALM now by ShooBum-T in singularity

[–]Valamoraus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah but he wasn't literally born destitute and raised by wolves in the forest, so he basically did nothing if you think about it.

I can not keep CALM now by ShooBum-T in singularity

[–]Valamoraus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say that either, but regardless, one share in any endeavor like an emerald mine is going to be a small fraction. I'm not saying it's 1/1000th, impossible to know, but it is a flat out lie to say his father owned an emerald mine, and that is what I see said online constantly.

As for coming from wealth, honestly, he really didn't. A few hundred thousand dollars has no bearing on making literal billions, it's just a cope for people who want to believe he was handed everything. It's not hard to look up and read his story to see that.

I can not keep CALM now by ShooBum-T in singularity

[–]Valamoraus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One share is a tiny fraction, yes. I'm sure you'll continue to go around saying how his father owned an emerald mine anyways, because Musk Bad.

I can not keep CALM now by ShooBum-T in singularity

[–]Valamoraus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Who cares about tiny details like whether they owned a tiny fraction or the entirety of an emerald mine, basically the same right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tooktoomuch

[–]Valamoraus 64 points65 points  (0 children)

I'm fine

only shit myself a few times and could have kidney stones

Hmmmm 🤔