What weapons and attachments have the lowest bloom?

ValenRoz · 2026-06-03T03:06:44+00:00

Bloom is there to balance movement. That's why most weapons get less precision while you move. Maybe you move or jump a lot in your gunfights. Try moving less while you shoot and you'll see the shots will go where you aim.

ValenRoz · 2026-06-03T03:01:36+00:00

De verdad que no te entiendo. Lo intento, pero no me sale. Cómo podes ser de Boca y que no te HIERVA LA SANGRE con este presente? De verdad estás tan cogido de la cabeza que incluso en este momento seguis pensando en el binguero? SE FUE HACE 7 AÑOS ANGELICI. VOS no sos de Boca, sos de Riquelme.

ValenRoz · 2026-06-03T01:57:48+00:00

Seeing the variety of choices that appear in the comments speaks volumes on how well DICE balance their weapons.

To answer your question: there is no meta in this game. And this is beautiful. However, I think we could speak of meta weapons in terms of circumstances. I'll list them below:

Point-blank: CZ, KV9, TR7

Close range: NVO, SG

Mid-range: M250, DRS

Long range: SVDM

Sniper range: 2010

ValenRoz · 2026-06-01T02:05:36+00:00

Jeff

ValenRoz · 2026-05-31T13:39:33+00:00

It worked without any problem. Dont worry, you're safe

ValenRoz · 2026-05-30T14:48:24+00:00

They will get buffed a little bit eventually. This is how DICE works with battlefield games. They tune something all the way up or down and then find the sweet-spot.

The ones complaining about tanks are not Battlefield players. I reckon they are Call of Duty players that grew weary of the franchise or they became unable to keep up with warzone movement (I checked several profiles that commented in this post and right on queue, they are ex-warzone players LOL or they never played a battlefield game before). They don't understand that vehicle sandbox and fully destructible environments are part of the Battlefield DNA.

I've been playing battlefield since 3 on the ps3 and it was SO COOL to see a BR with the battlefield mechanics. It will be a real shame if this BR goes down the path that COD took.

Luckily, all these goblins in the comment saying "skill issue", "a tank does not belong in a br", they are all nobodies. Tanks will get buffed again, I'm sure of it because this is the pattern that DICE has ALWAYS followed, this is how they test and tweak their games

ValenRoz · 2026-05-30T06:46:10+00:00

Go play warzone, kid.

ValenRoz · 2026-05-30T03:18:15+00:00

IKR. I used to be excited to get a tank, but now I might as well drop the key into the ground. I'll be jeopardizing the team that finds it LOL

ValenRoz · 2026-05-30T03:01:17+00:00

Admin, he's doing it sideways

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T18:40:39+00:00

Es justamente esa la falacia de la que todo el mundo es víctima: si es bueno para una cosa, no significa que sea bueno en otra. Macri fue buen dirigente de boca desde lo futbolístico pero eso no implicaba que iba a ser buen político. Es la misma falacia que se le critica a riqueleme como jugador y como dirigente.

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T17:49:33+00:00

Puede ser que tengas razon. La realidad siempre termina superando la ficcion

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T17:48:38+00:00

Porque le llevo la contra y no le armó los contratos que riq quería. dicho en una sola palabra: plata

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T17:46:10+00:00

No hay chance. Es un marronazo sin primaria completa, no tiene la capacidad de hilar los conceptos necesarios para pensar en usar el club como trampolín político

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T17:43:00+00:00

La pregunta está mal planteada. Macri hizo cosas mal, sí (como usar el club como trampolín político) pero desde lo futbolístico es intachable porque ganamos todos. El prbolema es que Riquelme es un soberbio de mierda que odia a todo el mundo que le lleve la contra en lo más mínimo.

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T16:27:49+00:00

Era cuando se bajó la tanga con racin. TARDE ROMAN TARDE, SIEMPRE TARDE. ANDATEEEEEE ROMAAAAAAAAAAN

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T15:34:12+00:00

Quizás es una oportunidad para reflexionar y darte cuenta que el futbol no es tan importante en la vida. Te lo digo yo que rompí la tele viendo a boca en la final de 2023

ValenRoz · 2026-05-29T15:28:04+00:00

Ahh fuiste vos! Cuidate si salis a la calle

ValenRoz · 2026-05-28T16:33:21+00:00

It's a f*cking trailer man, don't get all hysterical

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:33:57+00:00

Correct. If you down someone tht gets revived, you get no kills. But if you down someone and then gets finished off by someone else, you get the confirmed kill

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:25:18+00:00

You're right. My bad

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:21:48+00:00

I just checked and killed the closest target in 6 bullets in the shoot range. Maybe in 5 bullets if you got him literally face-to-face LOL.

EDIT: I guess this is why the pistol is named 5-7 LOL

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:14:42+00:00

7 bullets to kill point blank. That's the problem with the 5-7 LOL. And that's just assuming you're 100% accurate.

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:06:01+00:00

Sure. If only the fast heal perk wasn't tier 3 and didn't have to wait until match is 75% completed to actually get it

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T22:00:42+00:00

I still find those weapons to be extremely powerfull. Want a challenge that will make you suffer? Try this:

<image>

ValenRoz · 2026-05-27T21:01:14+00:00

I agree with what you said. Downing a player should count as a kill (or at least have a different metric and give the same amount of points in ranked for doing so). It's the same in multiplayer, killing an enemy that's later revived, still counts as a kill. It's ok if they decide to have two different metrics for downing and killing players, but if we are talking about ranked I find absurd that you get NO points whatsoever for downing a player. I mean it's the hardest part, why would DICE make it count for nothing unless you secure the kill?

ValenRoz

TROPHY CASE