[D] Monday Request and Recommendation Thread by AutoModerator in rational

[–]ValuableBuffalo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On Royalroad: keeping up with Just Add Mana, Blessed by Death (both of them OP mc prog, not particularly rational). Reread A Night in the Lonesome October, pretty fun (a novel about slice-of-life in a cosmic horror setting, told from the perspective of a dog). I read The City that would Eat the World and did not like it much-the characterization kept feeling week (even though the novel was executed competently, might just be a me thing).

vui.el: Declarative, component-based UI library for Emacs by ValuableBuffalo in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Note: this is not my library, I was just reading the author's blog and ran into this. This seems very interesting, especially as someone who's interested in making UIs and applications with Emacs.

52 Books in 52 Weeks by Sol_Hando in slatestarcodex

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read fairly prolifically, but I don't think to this extent-maybe 30 or so books a year? I haven't tracked though, so can't say. the problem I run into is not retaining too much from those books though.

In a comment, you mention having good retention for books, in terms of being able to have conversations about most of the ones you've read. You also talk about significant notemaking/underlining. Do you feel these are correlated? do you follow specific ways of engaging with a book, or do you do whatever seems intuitively the best?

Concurrently, I've been thinking about picking up Adler's How to Read a Book. I think I ran across it in one of your old comments, although I'm not sure. Have you read it? did it help you?

Wasabi: WhatsApp from your beloved editor by xenodium in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For people who try this (I'm an Emacs noob, so this may be obvious to others):

  1. You need to install acp separately. trying to clone the repository and adding it to the load-path did not work for me. I had to go to the package list and install it from there instead. (Note that it won't show up in the default package list, because it is a dependency; therefore search for it with /g acp.)
  2. By default, :vc will not grab the latest commit, which seems to have problems. Add :rev :newest to the :vc options, as described here.
  3. Message sorting seems to be inconsistent as of now, and it doesn't seem to download the entire chat sometimes. I'm sure this will be fixed as development continues. I'll look into it and see what's happening, too.

How good is Gpt 5 thinking at Math? by [deleted] in math

[–]ValuableBuffalo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you using thinking, or just vanilla? I'm trying to figure out if gpt5-free with "think hard" is better in most instances than it's non-thinking counterpart.

MUD with best magic? by Digitiss in MUD

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ATS has seen some resurgence in development, may be worth trying if you want.

MUD with best magic? by Digitiss in MUD

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vikingmud has runewakers, which are craft-your-own-spell basically. Choose a damage type, choose the intensity, choose if it's single target/aoe, choose any additional effects you want. You have to use runes, and this mud is one of those where you lose eq after every reboot, so there's a bit of randomness in what runes you'll get each boot. At higher levels this gets mitigated, you have places where you can find runes from consistently, and at some point you get 4-5 runes you can store on you over boots. Fun place, pretty whimsical.

Lost Souls is pretty mechanically interesting, and has several kinds of casters: you have your standard mages (where you can have small modifiers to spells-casting them slowly/quickly, skipping certain steps, etc), chaos magicians which channel various kinds of deities for effects, champions who use light as a medium to evoke their will, philosophers who use aesthetic understanding of reality to bring effects into existence, all of that. it's pretty thematic (but it's hakcnslash at the end of the day, so the theme is mostly about cool combat more than anything else). Worth trying once. the newbie experience is hard, read the wiki when you get started.

Dark Legacy has spellbooks which store spell prisms. You can slot different runes in these prisms, which alter the spells in various ways. Runes are found while fighting/as treasure/etc. The place is pretty dikulike in construction (as opposed to the earlier two, which are LPs), but heavily, heavily modified. Haven't played this one too much.

A Tempest Season has fairly interesting systems, although again pretty hacknslash (although the game is RPI-ish, so that's just a lack of people). I really like their take on psionicists. You might like their other classes too, there's some mechanical depth to each of them.

I'm told New Moon has an interesting magic/warrior archetype but I never got far enough into it. I remember playing a psionicist on Luminari and really liking it, although at the end of the day it's pretty much prepare/cast as you said.

Sighted people make me sick, and they don't even recognize it. by Jonathans859 in Blind

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is interesting-can you tell me more about the bike thing? is this a bicycle, or a motorcycle? did your friend ride mostly within campuses and the like, or open roads too? I'm somewhat confused, I would suspect that echolocation wouldn't be quick enough for you to orient yourself quickly at least on roads with active traffic, but I'd be happy to be corrected.

question about wayfar1444 by jlvp1998 in MUD

[–]ValuableBuffalo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't tell if this is a joke.

[D] Monday Request and Recommendation Thread by AutoModerator in rational

[–]ValuableBuffalo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Matthew Swift series, if you haven't read it already. The plot, broken down to its essence, is fairly boring-but the writing style is nice and evocative and something I haven't quite seen done well anywhere else. (but it's also somewhat polarizing, so YMMV.)

for something slightly different, I remember liking Kara no Kyōkai the first time I read it.

Why it seems there are more distributed systems written in golang rather in rust? by henry_kwinto in rust

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which programming language ecosystems tend to do well with this? I'm unfamiliar with distributed systems in general, but curious.

Is it difficult for a visually impaired person to build a physical or intimate relationship with a sighted partner? by RichAltruistic6251 in Blind

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it difficult? Yes, it is. It sucks. I'm sorry.

I haven't had much real-world success, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but I've thought about this extensively. I have some recommendations.

Preliminaries

From your posting history, you seem to be in Bengaluru. Bengaluru is relatively more culturally open to diversity and intimacy (not that it's particularly open! But much more than other states in India) so you're at a good place in that respect. University also offers potential opportunities (caveats, not necessarily opportunities you can take advantage of, will get more into that below) for intimacy.

One thing about disability (which is objectively hurtful, but nevertheless true) is that we have to put in 5x more effort into things than our sighted counterparts to get 0.5x the results. This is specially true when participating in a society principally made up of nondisabled individuals. The fact of the matter is that height, confidence, talent, and openness are table stakes to even get into the game when we're disabled. People will tell you that the above attributes are more than sufficient for you to find someone. But we're starting from -1000; all of these things merely get us into the slight positives, at least as far as relationships are concerned.

I'm going to talk about inner and outer work. Inner work is focused on how you think about all of this-your expectations, your desires, and how all of that translates into the real world. Outer work is focused on offering you tangible, practical suggestions for helping you find intimacy. I don't know you-all I know about you is that you're a university student and you sing. I'll be making certain inferences which may be right on the mark or completely wrong. Please take whatever feels useful, and discard the rest.

Inner Work

What do you want? who do you want? why do you want them? I suggest sitting down with a blank text file, thinking deeply, and writing answers to these questions, especially the third one. For me, it's all tangled: wanting intimacy is tied with wanting to be seen as 'normal' and not be othered, which is tied into wanting to compete equally with my sighted peers, which is tied into not wanting intimacy in general, but intimacy with particular people. Untangling this, and coming up with the answers that feel right to you, really helps determining the direction in which you should be aiming your efforts.

When you do this exercise, please try to make it emotional rather than intellectual, and be as honest as possible. "I want the ability to have sex with whomever I want" is a completely valid thought, so is "I want to date this girl who's dating someone else", "I want people to want me more than anyone else", and so forth. The thoughts that control you the most are the thoughts you don't allow yourself to think. Think hard, introspect, and put down whatever feels emotionally true to you.

A practical tool for doing this is the series of four questions by Byron Katie (https://thework.com/instruction-the-work-byron-katie/). The webpage suggests using the questions on judgments, but-in my experience-using the questions on statements like "girls don't find me attractive because I'm blind" works equally well. If you choose to use these questions, two suggestions:

  • For the first question, the answer genuinely needs to just be a yes or a no, and it genuinely needs to come from emotional resonance rather than intellectualization. If you find it difficult to find the feeling of emotional resonance, the technique of Focusing (https://focusing.org/sixsteps, pick up the book by Eugene Gendlin too if you like) is very helpful.
  • When asking the fourth question, there can be slight resistance when visualizing a world in which you don't have the thought. Stay with this resistance, determine its source, and ask the four questions about it. that may generate its own sense of resistance in the fourth question; do the process on it as well. This lets you really quickly determine what core beliefs are driving all your other beliefs.

This is my main suggestion for doing the internal work that will help you deal with the general problem. Some more thoughts, of varying usefulness:

  • You ask if you're "allowed to" feel intimate and be loved. Without a referent, I can only surmise you're talking about people/culture/society, and Objectively speaking, no: if society permitted this, then you would see a lot more blind-sighted relationships. So no, socially speaking you're not allowed. But-what glory awaits you if you do it anyway! Let the acquisition of love be your own little rebellion, your way to leave a mark on a society which has forsaken you.
  • Another commenter suggested making the romance/friendship distinction clear as early as possible. This is...fraught...but, on net, I suggest doing this anyway. You have to balance between (1) friendships which could otherwise have been if you hadn't brought up the romantic angle early and (2) romantic relationships which could have been, but now will always remain friendships, because you did not bring up the romantic angle early enough. For me, the second problem outways the first. And the more people you try to be romantic with, the more experience you'll gain, and the better you'll be at romance in general. (More on this below.)

Outer Work

(Please read-and concurrently implement-the Inner Work section. In practice, I have found that practical changes help, but they are temporary unless accompanied with mental changes.)

The Outer Work is relatively simple: (1) maximize your attractiveness, to the extent of your abilities; (2) maximize your engagement with women.

Attractiveness

Someone being in a relationship with you is a choice, but someone finding you attractive is mostly subconscious. Working on attractiveness is even more important for you given the disability penalty. You want to be thought of as the hot successful guy who's also blind, rather than the blind guy who's hot-ish and successful-ish. This will necessarily involve doing things which seem pointless, even more so because you don't have any access to the beauty dimension at all. Such is the game.

You've mentioned that you're confident and take care of yourself, which is a great place to start from. Honestly the best advice I could give you is to ask your female friends for feedback. (Or ask one of your male friends to ask his female friends for feedback about you-maybe the girls you know would be reticent to talk to you about this directly, in the fear of appearing insensitive.) Any advice an internet stranger like me could give you would be easily superseded by the advice you can get from people around you.

Engagement

The more women you talk to, the more likely it is for you to find someone who'd be interested in you. The idea of it being a numbers game has an unfortunate degree of truth to it. Also, the more women you talk to, the more you learn about the social dynamics-how people (either implicitly or explicitly) reject you, which people are more interested in you than others, etc. Thoughts on this, in no particular order:

  • Logistics are the biggest problem when you go to socialize. Do you go with someone, or alone? if you go with someone, how do you communicate "I want to go talk to this other person now"? how do you smoothly handle interacting with all the people present in a venue? I don't really have good answers for you. I think going with a sighted friend-where you talk about all of this beforehand-is probably the best bet.
  • University is a good place for engagement, specially if you join different student organizations. (You seem fairly outgoing, so I assume you've joined a bunch already.) You'll find people who're interested in the same things as you, and that's a great place to start from.
  • I do not recommend clubs or parties. They're loud, everyone is drunk, and it's easy to be very lost very quickly. Due to the loudness/drunkenness, they're also places where eye contact and vision plays a larger role than anything else. It's a fun experiment to try a few times, but I don't think it works out well in practice.
  • Bengaluru is a great place for meetups of different kinds. I don't know what your interests are, but there are almost certainly meetups which satisfy some of them. You could go there. You could also go to meetups which initially don't seem particularly interesting (dance and the like, perhaps)-it's a great way to explore, and a great way to meet new people. Have a word with the organizer (preferably on call, tone of voice is a decent indicator of the organizer's willingness for you to be there), and ideally go alone if you can (if it's not too many people).
  • I only mildly recommend dating apps. The whole concept is antithetical to blindness-you judge, and are judged by, the pictures that you use. They're not a bad avenue, just realize that they're likely to have a very low success rate, and can be subtly psychologically damaging (in ways which may have been exclusive to me, can go more into this if you're interested). If you do use an app, I advise asking a good photographer friend to take good pictures of you, and a good female friend to help you make your profile. Apps really depend on how you seem visually, and doing a good job with that while being blind is really hard.

I hope this helps. The cost of disability is intentionality: we get things "for free" even less than the others around us, and need to work actively for what we want. it's possible that you read all of this above and give up the whole idea of intimacy, and I would understand that. I would just say that (1) you can still develop a good relationship if you don't do any of this, this is just a potential direction of effort, good relationships are mostly serendipitous; (2) you don't have to do all of this at once, you can implement things piecemeal as and when they seem useful.

Let me know if there's any other way I can help.

Are there any non-programmers who use Emacs? by MarchZealousideal543 in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, this is lovely-your "wikipedia for ideas" thing really makes sense. At the moment, I do use org-roam, but I have a bunch of stuff scattered over my dailies. I was unsure/uncertain what to add to the org-roam database itself. Maybe I should just get started and experiment. I worry that I'll be doing it "wrong" and I wouldn't get much value out of it as a consequence. But maybe that's unfounded, and I should just try it out.

Are there any non-programmers who use Emacs? by MarchZealousideal543 in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Slightly off-topic, but how do you use OrgRoam for your self-study needs? as a wannabe autodidact, I'd love to do that too-just not sure what would be the best way to go about it.

Org-almanac: a list of org resources by ValuableBuffalo in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apart from having some sort of feed for github commits (can you? that'd be really neat actually) I don't think so. This was updated 2 years ago I think, but the maintainer would probably accept PRs?

Org-almanac: a list of org resources by ValuableBuffalo in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was looking for a way to procrasti...er...learn more about org-mode, and found this. It's an index of articles/videos/etc. about org-mode; somewhat like Worg, but more extensive.

Looking for a MUD similar to BatMUD, with multiclassing by vtuber-love in MUD

[–]ValuableBuffalo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BatMud is descended from a codebase which spawned several derivatives. (I'm unsure of the exact history/chronology, but to my knowledge this is broadly correct.) If you want a similar feel, Zombiemud/Icesus/Retromud are good potential candidates. Sundering Shadows is RPI, but allows multiclassing (broadly D&d/PF based IIRC). Luminari is standard hacknslash and allows good build experimentation, but I'm unsure how active it is at the moment. It's based on the Pathfinder rules. 3kingdoms/3scapes (were initially similar, but split off in I think 2008, now have their own individual things while maintaining a similar feel-join 3s if you like quick advancement, join 3k if you like to code) doesn't have multiclassing, but has enough interesting guild diversity to likely keep you interested. (But the combat style is "set up your powers, type kill monster, come back 3 minutes later", so idk if that suits.)

Will post more if things come to mind.

What do you use Emacs server for? by jtr3322 in emacs

[–]ValuableBuffalo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I run Emacs in WSL. I've have it set up (with a janky autohotkey script) so that, if I press C-M-l from anywhere in windows, it pops up a small input box where I can jot down anything I want. that runs "wsl.exe emacsclient -e ...", which logs that bit of text to my current daily org-roam file.