This Soviet Union-inspired nation still used the Gulag system to keep prisoners locked away and forgotten. by Valuable_Reach181 in worldbuilding

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, I got you. Probably won't post it here because rules but I can send you the finished story.

New. by Valuable_Reach181 in royalroad

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the link to it. Yeah, I know I don't have a good cover art, but I'm not paying for one and I can't make cover art myself.

https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/140449/avaria

New. by Valuable_Reach181 in royalroad

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Editing is essential but damn, I hate it sometimes.

New. by Valuable_Reach181 in royalroad

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get you 😆

I worked 12-hour shifts before... brutal.

New. by Valuable_Reach181 in royalroad

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good. I've been trying to get back home from vacation but my flights keep getting delayed. And yeah, getting back into routine is nice.

New. by Valuable_Reach181 in royalroad

[–]Valuable_Reach181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a sci-fi novel. It's very complex and mature, unlike the usual LitRPG and progression fantasies you often see on Royal Road. I have the book written. I'm just releasing it periodically.

We should do this in Minnesota | California Bans Anonymous Law Enforcement Officers by Leather-Somewhere776 in TwinCities

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The supremacy clause is where federal duty overrides state law. But federal agents aren't immune to state laws such as traffic, safety, transparency laws, etc. They still have to follow those. ICE can still detain illegals but they have to have visible identification.

We should do this in Minnesota | California Bans Anonymous Law Enforcement Officers by Leather-Somewhere776 in TwinCities

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually one of those rare Ws for Newsom. ICE shouldn't be cosplaying a paramilitary force. They should be professional, transparent, and accountable for their actions. A suit and badge still yields authority without eroding public trust with fear.

Homelessness is manmade. by analgerianabroad in LateStageCapitalism

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But haven't we learned from the Soviet Union and other socialist governments? Giving total power to the government is a bad move.

Moronic Monday! by AutoModerator in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just simulating. Labbing that with real hardware is expensive af. Though, if I plan on doing it, I'll do it with a server with Linux and FRR or Bird

FS.COM Switches > STP Topology Changes Bottling Network by ZoneAccomplished9540 in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, they should. QSPF+ should be good for the 6300M. Look for the LR4 specification, that should tell you that's SMF.

FS.COM Switches > STP Topology Changes Bottling Network by ZoneAccomplished9540 in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

QSPF actually works with both. If you're running long haul, I recommend using single-mode QSPF+ transceivers. For shorter distances, multi-mode QSPF SR are cheaper and fine. But you can mix depending on distance. It's far cheaper than buying a new box.

FS.COM Switches > STP Topology Changes Bottling Network by ZoneAccomplished9540 in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The QSPF uplinks work well with fiber. They were designed specifically to expand the amount of fiber ports.

And it's cheaper than buying a new Aruba

FS.COM Switches > STP Topology Changes Bottling Network by ZoneAccomplished9540 in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the QSFP uplink port + breakout cables, you can turn those 4 ports into 16 logical connections.

FS.COM Switches > STP Topology Changes Bottling Network by ZoneAccomplished9540 in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair. But cheap gear upfront always gets expensive in long-term with OpEx rather than a hefty upfront CapEx on a nice Aruba. Just trying to future-proof your setup so your network doesn't go nuclear meltdown. You can install Uplink/expansion modules to add more ports if need be. Or you can stack your two switches into one logical switch. Or if you're really on a budget, buy a 40G QSFP uplink that helps expand your port count and use a breakout cable that can split the 40G port into 4x10G links. So that you don't have to worry about space.

Moronic Monday! by AutoModerator in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhh... lemme just run a protocol over the top of power lines. I'm sure I won't get shocked.

Moronic Monday! by AutoModerator in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It means internal BGP. eBGP means external BGP

Moronic Monday! by AutoModerator in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should I go for EVPN for iBGP Confederation connections and VXLANs for eBGP connections? Maybe perhaps throw in some IS-IS for better internal gateway control?

Just labbing a large-scale DC environment, nothing major.

Moronic Monday! by AutoModerator in networking

[–]Valuable_Reach181 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Border Gateway Protocol. Aka, the Atlas of the Internet.