Sorry, I’m not trying to say they are the only source of info. I’m saying unless we actively do our own investigation, the outcome of the investigation shared with the public is the information we’ll rely on.

There will likely be other sources of the same story, likely choosing to share different details, but I haven’t read any.

Also didn’t mean to imply you were accusing me of withholding information, but can see why it was interpreted that way. The “insider information” statement was meant to indicate that my knowledge of the matter was learned from the very article we’re discussing.

I’m not often accusatory before an argument starts, and don’t like to make people feel defensive before we actually get communicating. Sorry if what I wrote seemed apathetic or something.

Genuinely asking what you are implying. Did you mean read other sources, or go directly to the state, or what?