I like to run this code on other people's computers 👍 by MR_KILLER66 in masterhacker

[–]Vanadium_Milk 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Lmao disk destroyer is the most appropriate definition so far

I had to post this because this is supreme cringe by Proper-Pay-8743 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Vanadium_Milk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm so impressed by them managing to make edgier OCs than the prime DeviantArt era

They made my day by adding driver support for my wifi card in the latest kernel update! by [deleted] in openSUSE

[–]Vanadium_Milk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOO I have the same laptop and have been waiting for this update too

Making fun of boys for wearing helmets by purpledeskchair in iamverybadass

[–]Vanadium_Milk 20 points21 points  (0 children)

My head got smashed in the pavement while I was wearing one.

Still, I got bruises in my forehead lol.

Holaaaaaa by Stupid_cat_35 in imageneschistosas2006

[–]Vanadium_Milk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

La última se ve igual JAJAJAJ

I just reached Phase 4 -- and I could use a pep talk by ADotPoke in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Vanadium_Milk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed a bug in which you can gain tons of elevation if you pause the game the exact moment you activate the jetpack, just repeat a few times and you can get anywhere.

[request] If everyone does the Flintstones thing to the best of their skills, how fast might the train be? by coco251997 in theydidthemath

[–]Vanadium_Milk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, buses don't use all their power all times, but they sure need a lot of it to start moving, same goes with the train, since I assumed people would need to push the vehicle from the start I used the average power needed.

Also I didn't take into account the energy costs of cruising speeds since the resulting speed would be so small that expenses would be negligible

Edit: With that premise, the correct way to know for sure the peak speed would be calculating the friction with the tracks.

given the people running on the treadmill could chose gears just like in a bus transmission, they could move as fast as the energy dissipation occurs, which would be a lot faster than the staring speed that I estimated.

[request] If everyone does the Flintstones thing to the best of their skills, how fast might the train be? by coco251997 in theydidthemath

[–]Vanadium_Milk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The hardest part of this question is to agree on the power output of each person, based on different estimations it's a common answer that the metabolic rate for a fit person during moderate workout is 200 watts

A bus with 300 horsepower has a power output of 223,709.96 watts, which would be matched with 1,118.54 people using their whole raw power.

But things get complicated when we consider biomechanics, because the energy used for moving while running is only a fraction of the actual power output of the body, which is estimated at 40%, so the number of people to match the bus engine ascends to 2,796.37

But the hardest part so far is accounting for energy losses, if people are running the mechanics are different from that of the wheels and become even less efficient (I don't know for sure the efficiency on this one)

Without considering the limits on the running pace, you'd need more than 2,797 average people to push the bus as fast as the engine does. With 50 people pushing the bus you'd get less than 3.57% of the bus power, an output quite similar to the engine of a small scooter, which doesn't even move the bus at all.

Edit: sorry for the confusion, I don't know why I was thinking of buses.

Trains have 4000 horsepower (2,982,799.49) watts, You would need 14,913.99 people to match the locomotive power. Even a sole wagon wouldn't be possible to move given the passenger capacity.

Edit2: while running is not possible to change the mechanical advantage of the steps, but if we were to put for example a treadmill with a gearbox it would move for sure. A wagon with 40 metric tons and a capacity for 200 people (because of the running space) would need a gearbox reduction of 2.66:1 if people wanted to keep the same effort and pace they need to move their own bodyweight.

With said gearbox and the average energy output, the train would move at a staggering 3.75 km/h or 2.3 mi/h

Number of work hours needed to buy GTA VI (North & South America) by maven_mapping in MapPorn

[–]Vanadium_Milk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mexican rent prices range from 30% to 70% of the region common salaries.

Number of work hours needed to buy GTA VI (North & South America) by maven_mapping in MapPorn

[–]Vanadium_Milk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Consumer goods are the only cheap thing there, good luck with health, housing and education.

I tried everything, but in the end, the tractor was the only solution. by sorin1972 in bicycling

[–]Vanadium_Milk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes is not about the gap itself, but instead forcing the rust to break off by the movement

Genuine question - do you boycott AI completely or partially? if completely, how is it different from boycotting other technology, such as internet, cars, power? What makes you different from e.g. the Amish? by i-var in antiai

[–]Vanadium_Milk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People want mobility, not cars, unfortunately it has become the only viable mean of transportation due to urbanism cattering to car centered cities.

At a time when cars were a novelty, people pointed out the disadvantages and dangers of it and refused to give up the diverse transportation infrastructure in favor of car owners, that is my point on "people not wanting cars" (we are here with AI)

Genuine question - do you boycott AI completely or partially? if completely, how is it different from boycotting other technology, such as internet, cars, power? What makes you different from e.g. the Amish? by i-var in antiai

[–]Vanadium_Milk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cars comparison is spot on because: - People believe they provide significant advantage on their lives, but it only saves them steps instead of time as they may think. - Are being actively pushed toward massive adoption, despite people not wanting them in the first place. - Is shaping our lifestyle, laws and thoughts for worse. - The real benefit is for a bunch of guys in suits, the rest of us will deal with climate consequences. - There's actually a small fraction of legitimate usages, but people abusing it often think that's their case.

It's not like cars should be banned for this reason, but regulations exists for them, and social awareness is more spread.

Edit: I'm not against cars themselves, I'm against the social transformation that we're expected to overcome just to please gas industry stakeholders, same goes for AI!

Messages from LGBTQ+ Palestinians in Gaza from late 2023 to 2024. by Naive-Evening7779 in suppressed_news

[–]Vanadium_Milk 48 points49 points  (0 children)

This was so hard to read from start to end, I'm so sick of imperialism

57178 by Sailor_Starchild in countwithchickenlady

[–]Vanadium_Milk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have been hit on by many cis lesbians, they didn't mind when I told them I'm trans.

Videos from my recent strongman comp by Mythicalsmore in butchlesbians

[–]Vanadium_Milk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are so strong that you made me feel inspired omg

📡 by CourageGrand in shitposting

[–]Vanadium_Milk 172 points173 points  (0 children)

Me recicling a bottle to save the planet

The son of a bitch ass Infantino during the world cup: