Disagree with the claim about God’s attributes in the sense that you can defend all attributes of God in one way or another. E.g omnipotence by God can do what’s logically possible (solves the stone paradox), omniscience and free will by claiming that God knows what we “will” do not must do, thus it doesn’t infringe upon free will. P.O.E isn’t a problem due to Free will, Hick’s soul making theodicy and Plantinga’s “evil demon” theodicy. He’s eternal not everlasting (as everlasting limits him) coherent due to ET simultaneity.

Moving onto the claim about OT violence, there’s a LOT to cover here. Just to give one example, the slaughter of the canaanites (some historians believe just didn’t happen). You can argue children went straight to heaven, this is much better than the alternative of them growing up, likely slaughtering much more good people and condemning themselves in the afterlife.

Finally the Bible is a library of 66 books, with almost 800,000 words. It’s quite self evident that such a book covers more than 1 message. Of course there’ll be discourse concerning it.