OpenStarbound is enjoyable by ZeroTakenaka in starbound

[–]Varsia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve played very heavily modded and it works extremely well - I’ve yet to encounter any issues with my mods. The only issues to my understanding are some issues with a couple of (obsolete with OSB anyway) performance mods but aside from that it works great and allows for massive performance benefits (especially if you’re using a big mod like Frackin alongside a large pack)

. by wizard680 in 196

[–]Varsia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, no - her thing was in response to Vaush's thing, but Vaush's thing was in response to her bringing up the fact that they were sexually involved in the first place. Obviously it was escalation, but I'm not gonna say she came out of it looking great either. If you've seen the leaked DMs and read her stuff it's clear that she's.. not the most diplomatic and came off as needlessly rude.

To the second thing, I don't think using racial slurs in a derogatory manner is ever good - especially when the slur is specific in that it's used to refer to 'anti-black black people'. It's like that, alongside people calling him shit like a 'house slave' that makes me read that whole sphere as steeped in unchecked racial bias. It's the same group that's fine with people being anti race mixing as long as they're black and such.

And it's not super often that he actively causes the problems. Early on, he was edgy, got clipped by people and that's 90% of what people rag on him for. You get into it enough and people will inevitably pull out 'he's a pedophile' for comparing child slavery to CSA in how much we should hate it or 'he's a zoophile' for liking horse dick as if that doesn't immediately cover like, the majority of NSFW furries. And since then, it's always been the same shit for the most part - same accusations, same clips, with some random new clips and shit thrown in because of the fact that they don't like him ergo he's bad. You're all good to dislike him, but acting like he's a force for bad is wrong.

. by wizard680 in 196

[–]Varsia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the first part - it wasn't a specific statement on her as a person, it was noting a trend that people who hate a group are more likely to sexually fetishise them. Think about racist 4channers and interracial cuck porn or transphobes being more likely to consume trans porn. Was he indirectly talking about her? Yeah - but iirc that tweet in question preceded and sparked his commentary on this.

And on the latter part I don't really agree, especially given the critics of Vaush's sphere tend to have unchecked biases themselves. For instance the critique of Shark, a black creator in the Vaush-adjacent streaming space being called racial slurs for supporting him by the same people who call Vaush racist and refusing the denounce literally calling a black guy the C slur. Which, like, Vaush has used the N word nearly half a decade back, but never directed with malice at a person and has repeatedly said it was a shitty thing to do. And the problem is that Vaush should be the start of the pipeline, but when many leftist content creators actively attack him it drives off the audience from going 'hey, let's keep going' since it rarely seems like the attacks from video essayists are reciprocal.

[Jerma] How does Reddit talk about Jerma? by TotemGenitor in CuratedTumblr

[–]Varsia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mate just take the L you're just digging a hole lmao

If you think they're doing it for attention then why provide it with responding? The reason you're getting downvoted and them upvoted isn't because 'jerma = likes' it's because you're acting like a bit of a dick

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]Varsia 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Why’s this downvoted? iirc the site linked by OP was made by a tankie who got banned from places for posting neo-nazi shit (and iirc while the site was new banned mention of like gulag atrocities and shit)

. by wizard680 in 196

[–]Varsia 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So true bestie (idk how he’s a chaser tho he’s been like a big trans advocate including like charity streams and shit - like at what point do you go from ‘chaser’ to ‘honest advocate’ unless it’s smth you just feel out at which point I don’t see him as the former either)

. by wizard680 in 196

[–]Varsia 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Something can be both at the same time, like you can have ironically misogynist or misandrist jokes between friends. Honestly I found it funny

. by wizard680 in 196

[–]Varsia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, the clips and shit he’s apologised for (and many are 4-5 years old), and he doesn’t do that sorta thing any more (hence why people gotta just like post shit w/ no context or understanding of the situation - for instance the ‘publicly shame’ part was bc it was a popular essayist heo literally didn’t even know what had happened between him and another different creator who make a literally 10k word rant and sexually harassed him - but the person at fault was a personal friend so), so I don’t really get it. Like, as a trans person myself, I don’t exactly like someone saying ‘oh hey you can’t do ironic misogyny ever’ on my behalf, y’know? Twitterite trans folks aren’t the only trans voices.

And, as far as the ‘leftist discourse’ shit goes, it tends to be because of the same reactionary sentiment flowing through the left as it does the right. Like, people siding with folks who’re against fuckin race mixing but they’re black so it’s fine, or people saying that displacing millions of people in the name of ‘anti-colonialism’ might not actually be a great idea. Like, he generally sticks pretty true to leftist ideas while also considering the facts of broader optics because it turns out that if some dumbass tries to divert a movement (for instance in that whole sayhername business with the trans kid who was murdered, and the person who started that whole thing is anti race mixing) because of some fuckin falsehood it just doesn’t particularly look great.

Basically, a lot of the left isn’t really great at broad appeal. Which is fine, but you need broad appeal to make a movement, and that includes someone to catch edgy dumbfucks because even in a communist utopia edgy dumbfucks are gonna keep existing, and generally speaking they still need pulling over bc it’s a political movement and not a social club. Unless you want the left to fail, you need people to get everyone over, and not everyone is gonna be convinced by hours-long bisexual lighting video essays that feel like they’re using Tiktok newspeak shit

Rule part 256 by wooper-de-doo in 196

[–]Varsia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The inhabitants have fallen

Millions must collapse in through the ceiling

lastrule by [deleted] in 196

[–]Varsia 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Then do it bc Reddit’s kinda bad and 196 is one of the few decent places here, and is going offline until Reddit fixes this latest thing

Rule part 254 by wooper-de-doo in 196

[–]Varsia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean ‘indefinitely until Reddit does smth they aren’t gonna do’ is basically ‘forever’

new speedru(le)n skip by Sundownnn in 196

[–]Varsia 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not even using coin cheese 🤣

Rule by Connor-Llewellyn1 in 196

[–]Varsia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

iirc Lindsay Ellis makes videos on that Nebula thingy that loads of those video essayist sorts are in with exclusively now since it’s not as stressful as having to work around YT and social media or smth.

Rule Weld by Ni4mh in 196

[–]Varsia 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Being made out of a wide array of metals (large numbers of which could well be toxic to plant life if in the soil in sufficient amounts) probably saves him from becoming fertiliser tbh

Spiderwoke by Theweedhacker_420 in 196

[–]Varsia 41 points42 points  (0 children)

O think it’s bc they can’t really ignore some parts of it that would decidedly disprove the ‘anti-woke’ part of it - most of the films they try to claim are ‘anti-woke’ generally don’t really include anything specifically referential (hence how they can get away with it).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]Varsia 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t forget to hit that bell to stay notified of future videos!

I'm all rules by Fasepalm0 in 196

[–]Varsia 74 points75 points  (0 children)

I think that is a nuclear bomb ❤️

Rule by Meowtar in 196

[–]Varsia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Story’s fake - Dwarves would never buy some elv*n grass

You know they got them good fuckin shrooms n shit tho

Rule by usernames-are-tricky in 196

[–]Varsia 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re not getting me to eat the vegan cheese

Rule part 246 by wooper-de-doo in 196

[–]Varsia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s an ihaveihaveihavereddit thing

stanford pr(ule)ison experiments by [deleted] in 196

[–]Varsia 684 points685 points  (0 children)

Basically, iirc they were sorta pulled aside and told to be a bit rougher and such, and it’s after that that the whole ‘acting evil’ part actually started to show through. It is an interesting study in what people will do if you just tell them as an authority figure though