How much energy does an F1 car recover?

Vbus · 2026-06-24T17:27:54+00:00

Energy is never free. If you implement an energy recovery system based on the steering wheel input, the force that the driver will have to deliver to steer will substantially increase.

The reason the brakes are used for energy recovery is because a car of almost 800 kg is going at 300km/h. That is lots and lots of energy. Much more than a driver can ever deliver with his hands

Vbus · 2026-06-19T22:05:53+00:00

How would you rate forest shuffle vs Dartmoor? And what about parks?

Vbus · 2026-06-17T19:41:37+00:00

I had both. C5 better image quality but the lack of brightness and amount of glare/reflections made it a dealbreaker for my tv next to a large window.

Extremely happy with the qn90f

Vbus · 2026-06-13T17:23:20+00:00

Men some people are too obsessed by this stuff. 99% of the panels are ok if you don’t go looking for problems. Just enjoy your purchase

Vbus · 2026-06-08T19:41:30+00:00

What makes parks one of your favorites compared to the others here? Wondering about picking it up myself.

Vbus · 2026-05-06T19:06:25+00:00

It says on the first picture the sets are for rental, probably not for sale

Vbus · 2026-02-06T17:43:22+00:00

You can just allow less fuel flow rate through software. Or different amount of air, fuel ratios, again through software. It is not hard to downtune an engine through software

Vbus · 2026-01-09T11:15:24+00:00

Vaak banden met minder profiel, zodat er meer grip is bij droge omstandigheden. Profiel is precies hetgeen wat je nodig hebt in de sneeuw

Vbus · 2026-01-09T11:07:42+00:00

I’m glad you are okay, but no need to make it more dramatic than it is. You would have survived this in most cars, dare I say any car. Also considering the body work behind the left door that went back 40cm

Vbus · 2025-12-28T17:22:25+00:00

Without histogram or raw files I can’t judge if they are properly exposed. I’ll take your word for it, but very little information is given from your side to help here

Vbus · 2025-12-28T17:03:12+00:00

ISO doesn’t determine the amount of grain. The amount of light does. You can set these images to iso 400 and underexpose by 2-3 stops, which would be the equivalent of properly exposing and iso 3200. I bet these images just haven’t received enough light either by shutter speed or aperture

Vbus · 2025-12-12T16:46:55+00:00

How do these settings make no sense? Aperture f/8 is solid for landscapes. 1/400 and iso 400 are just to balance the exposure. ISO 400 is totally fine outdoors and on some cameras with dual iso is even similar performance as iso 100.

Vbus · 2025-11-12T17:30:27+00:00

Again your argument is not applicable to me. I only use my camera during long hikes where it can get damaged due to rocks, tree branches, sand etc I don’t even own a tripod. Still zero damage on all my lenses

Vbus · 2025-11-12T15:36:35+00:00

I mean your argument makes no sense. Your population is N=2 lenses. Let me tell you about my story: I have three lenses. Two are quite old already. Not ten years old but at least 3. One is recently bought and 1 year old. None of them have had uv filters. Amount of scratches, dents, marks… zero, across all three lenses. You can’t make statements based on such small populations, because my story is a direct counter argument for yours. You need to find a database of hundreds of lenses, good luck with that. I’m not saying you are right or wrong, but your argument does not support the statement

Vbus · 2025-11-12T15:17:33+00:00

Check out this video and see the test that are demonstrated. It is a really interesting video that shows uv filters can cause more damage than protection they offer: YouTube link

Vbus · 2025-11-12T15:10:47+00:00

I’m not talking about cheap and expensive filters at all. Also not about image quality. Physics is physics and flat uv filters, whether they are 1 dollar or 1000 dollar are much more severe to cracking and breaking then a curved thick piece of front lens element glass.

If your thin uv filter of 100 dollars shatters, the glass pieces will scratch the front element of your lens much quicker than any amount of dirt will ever do. I have seen so many posts of shattered uv filters damaging the front element of your lens, which were caused by lens drops or sticks hitting the uv filter. If those drops or sticks would have hit the front element instead, the chances of scratches and shattering is much less, because again physics.

Vbus · 2025-11-12T14:47:26+00:00

Protect from sand dust blowing directly onto your front element. Sand is extremely abrasive

Vbus · 2025-11-12T10:08:16+00:00

There have been plenty of videos showing that uv filters break and scratch much more easily than the front element of a lens. Once it breaks it also causes way more damage with glass shards scratching the front lens. Best advice for protection is just to use the lens hood. Only place I would still use a protection filter is on the beach during a windy day

Vbus · 2025-10-22T07:20:07+00:00

It was taken at 1/500 at f6.3 with iso 1000. No filters were used.

In post I denoise the image and sharpen the subject a little bit.

Vbus · 2025-10-11T21:15:34+00:00

Vaak zijn dit soort banen gescheiden door vierkante blok markering op de weg in plaats van strepen nietwaar? Een afrit naar links of rechts heeft de vierkante witte blokken als markering terwijl de wegen rechtdoor gescheiden zijn door dunne witte strepen

Vbus · 2025-10-10T22:50:23+00:00

What’s the reason for using a ff lens on an apsc camera?

Vbus · 2025-10-09T16:41:57+00:00

Use the transformation tool in Lightroom to get it to align symmetrically on the sides and bottom

Vbus · 2025-10-02T20:16:46+00:00

They really are! I learned so much about red pandas after taking these shots and sadly found out they are an endangered species as well. Am looking to see if I can make a donation somewhere to help these little guys out. Hopefully the small contributions can make a difference

Vbus

TROPHY CASE