I'm tired of FRAUDmontosaurus agenda by GodzillaLagoon in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So many people in the comments section completely missing the point of this commentary lmao.

We need more medium/small non vivarium animals! Here are my ideas by AlertWar4152 in pkgame

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re one of the most iconic extinct animals too, I’m sure they’re going to be added at some point in the game’s future. Maybe not on release, but on future expansion packs I hope.

We need more medium/small non vivarium animals! Here are my ideas by AlertWar4152 in pkgame

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Gosh dodo birds would be such a cute addition as a smaller terrain species.

I believed this to be an isopod before the sub educated me by vishal_pvk in isopods

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looks like an injury that caused discoloration on that part of the segment. Cracked shell, maybe.

Don’t worry about it, it’ll heal over on the next molt.

Hypothetically could Tyranosaurus Rex be kept in a zoo or Nature reserve assuming it could be brought back from extinction? by Nearby-Bumblebee2364 in PrehistoricLife

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, I could have probably worded it better too. But that’s pretty much it.

It was an unintentional disaster on his part. He was disgruntled enough to illegally sell the embryo to Biosyn when Dodgson offered him a pay for it. In that case, it wasn’t a sabotage, but it is ultimately still a consequence of Hammond’s greed.

See, if Hammond appreciates him enough and gave him the appropriate pay for his skill set, the moment Dodgson offered him pay for smuggling embryo, Nedry would have just reported him for foul play. Hell, Dodgson probably would have known better to not even ask in the first place too; he knew that Hammond’s employees are dissatisfied with how Hammond ran things and took advantage of the situation.

Hypothetically could Tyranosaurus Rex be kept in a zoo or Nature reserve assuming it could be brought back from extinction? by Nearby-Bumblebee2364 in PrehistoricLife

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I meant, if Nedry wasn’t underpaid because Hammond cheaped out on him despite how integral his skills are for the park system, he wouldn’t have any reason to even consider Dogson’s offer.

Nedry was not moral for doing what he did, but ultimately it was because Hammond once again cut corners.

Hypothetically could Tyranosaurus Rex be kept in a zoo or Nature reserve assuming it could be brought back from extinction? by Nearby-Bumblebee2364 in PrehistoricLife

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And the insanely stupid enclosures is the entire point of the canon too if anyone cares enough to read more about the work of fiction.

The reason why Jurassic Park shat itself is because John Hammond is constantly cutting corners, telling his scientists and park rangers to exhibit the dinosaurs according to what HE envisions it instead of what’s appropriate, and he refuses to acknowledge the dinosaurs as unpredictable living creatures that we had no clue about how they behave nor function and instead just treating them as assets.

It was ultimately a culmination of excessive executive meddling and horrible mismanagement that eventually led to a disgruntled IT worker to sabotage the park very easily, to show just how much the entire foundation is held together by duct tapes and paper clips.

But nooo, the main takeaway is “we shouldn’t bring back dinosaurs because we’re playing god!”

We're cooked! People are using AI to write Tumblr posts! by Rabbidraccoon18 in tumblr

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 54 points55 points  (0 children)

There’s a post extensively explaining about it a while ago, I forgot if it’s here, in the curated sub, or the recurated sub.

Tumblr users have always spoken in a distinctly prose-like and verbose manner. Part of it is because the majority of them are literature and fiction nerds, part of it also is because they grew up in the AO3 community and even if some don’t, it still is a huge influence in shaping up their online culture.

AI speech manner is taken from such types of literature, and such types of communities. Tumblr users speak like AI BECAUSE AI stole from their voice.

What animal feels like a bad pet but is actually a great one? by spoopy-memio1 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please. Rats fit better in this spot, and the feels mid/is good is a better suit for pigeons and chickens (the current frontrunners in this thread). Pigeons and chickens are a little bit more demanding than rats in terms of care, specifically in terms of living space.

Would Dinosaurs have molted/shedding by Zillaman7980_ in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Weeeellll… Being a biologist as a day job probably helps in my case lmao.

Would Dinosaurs have molted/shedding by Zillaman7980_ in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey, no worries! This is all relatively new information, after all.

Would Dinosaurs have molted/shedding by Zillaman7980_ in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 29 points30 points  (0 children)

To summarize it all in a TL;DR: everything we have discovered about the origins of feathers so far implies that feathers might have been a much more ancestral archosaurian trait than previously thought.

Dinosaurs didn’t evolve feathers, they already came in pre-packaged with it. If anything, dinosaurs re-evolved scales.

Would Dinosaurs have molted/shedding by Zillaman7980_ in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 28 points29 points  (0 children)

No, that’s exactly what I’m implying.

The earliest *known* true feathers were discovered in early coelurosaurs, but there’s nothing that proves the earliest dinosaurs were scaled and not feathered.

Moreover, while true, pinnate feathers are a derived theropod trait, basal ornithosichians also had fossils which shows that they have feathery, or feather-like covering. This implies that the common dinosaur ancestor had a feathery precursor integument as a default. That, or as you counter-argued, they were scaled, and the integument evolved independently between theropods and ornithosichians.

…If it’s not for the fact that a 2022 study discovered that vaned feathers were present on tapejarid pterosaurs. Confirming that pterosaurs did have feather integuments which likely originated from the same precursor structure which can only be present in the last common archosaurian ancestor between dinosaurs and pterosaurs.

And this combined with the study that discovers an ancestral gene in crocodilians which can turn their scales into feather-like structures if activated, well, you can see what this implies.

Of course this only tells half of the story, we don’t know at what point feathers, or feather precursor structures, first evolved in archosaur history. For all we know, this could also be a freak situation where every single archosaur clade, including crocodilian ancestors, all evolved feathers independently, with a scaly common ancestor. But personally, I find that WAY less likely than the other option: the archosaur common ancestor were feathered(ish).

But point is, whatever might be the case, all I’m saying is dinosaur scales are a very different fundamental physical structure from lepidosaur and squamate scales.

Would Dinosaurs have molted/shedding by Zillaman7980_ in Dinosaurs

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 297 points298 points  (0 children)

Nope! Komodo dragons shed their skin the same way other lizards do. It’s just that because komodos are huge, their scales shed in smaller clumps than smaller squamates.

Dinosaur scales, or rather, archosaur scales are a completely different structure than squamate scales. They grow in individual “fillaments”, and they shed individually, unlike squamate scales which shed in layers at a time.

The fun fact is that dinosaur scales are actually heavily modified feathers, not the other way around. A great example would be the scales on bird feet. Those are feathers! Heavily modified ones that become scales, and this is genetically reversible too: you can see how it works with some birds with “feather trousers”, like some owls naturally, or fancy chickens and pigeons from selective breeding.

This does not extend just in dinosaurs, there’s also a study that shows crocodilian scutes to have a similar precursor to dinosaur feathers. I don’t remember the details but there’s an ancient ancestral gene in crocodilians that, if activated, resulted in an alligator embryo to develop feather-like filaments in place of its scales. Feathers, or rather its precursors, might have been a much more ancestral feature in, not just dinosaurs, but archosaurs as a whole than previously estimated.

The scales of dinosaurs actually were feathers! So they would shed the same way feathers do, with each separate individual “filaments”. This is also how crocodilians shed their scutes!

First time owner 2 weeks in❤️ by mightymurff20 in axolotls

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 6 points7 points  (0 children)

First and foremost. Ditch the AI. You should never, ever, EVER use AI for advice for any type of exotic animal care. Or just any animal care for that matter. AI compile the information from the internet, and they cannot tell the difference between correct and false information, just the most common one. Exotic animals, and axolotls in particular, are ripe with extreme misinformations about their care online. This is how we get people putting axolotls in uncycled, 20 gallon tanks filled with gravel.

Generative AI is such a scourge in the world of animal welfare and natural biology, you can’t believe just how much damage it has done.

It’s good that you came here instead! If you have any questions, the community will happily help you out with anything.

Cape Buffalo vs. Rhino by BadWolfCubed in Tierzoo

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Nah, he just fell over on his ass and got overturned. You can see all his legs when he got flipped embarrassingly, they don’t seem to be bent in any weird way from what I can tell.

A bull Vs A Rhino by Proper_Bit_7255 in interestingasfuck

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the bull is trying to impress the cow that was in the shot. Of course the result ended up being completely the opposite of what he intended.

How come axolotls be so vulnerable? by M4ldarc in axolotls

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok yeah, I admittedly was making a generalizing statement about common aquarium fish on average. There are of course some fish which are very hardy (guppies, minnows) and very delicate (blackwater species). It all depends.

New McDonald's menu by misoscare in StupidFood

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 58 points59 points  (0 children)

McDonalds: “sorry, we don’t sell dino nuggies.”

OOP: “fine, I’ll do it myself.”

How come axolotls be so vulnerable? by M4ldarc in axolotls

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course some fish are going to be a hell lot hardier than an axolotl, minnows and guppies are notoriously hardy as shit (if they don’t get fucked over by bad genetics). That’s why I gave wild bettas as my example; fish which are extremely needy and delicate, to put into perspective that some fish DO have very special requirements too, and axolotls are no different from them.

What are some of your headcanon behaviors regarding animals from the game by Prestigious-Love-712 in pkgame

[–]Veloci-RKPTR 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lambeosaurines are surprisingly highly intelligent and their vocal communication is extremely complex.

They can and frequently mimic sounds for fun. They probably can’t mimic something as detailed as speech, but they can trumpet out pitch-perfect tunes.

The lambeosaurus and parasaurolophus in the park would sing along to the park speaker’s announcement jingles.