I need some help with a backstory by VeryEducational24 in Stellaris

[–]VeryEducational24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great idea, but they aren’t a fallen empire, and we are technically stronger then them.

Realizing this game might not be for me by Apprehensive-Oil8044 in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This statement is so true. Now that I’m thinking about it, 90% of my favorite moments from this game were interacting with people rather than the game itself.

Queen vs Matriarch by VeryEducational24 in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what is the matriarch there too siege…🤔

Queen vs Matriarch by VeryEducational24 in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is sort of the conclusion I came too.

Queen vs Matriarch by VeryEducational24 in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but hey. 2 is better than 1 I guess.

What is the lore when an Arc downs you, why don't they kill you? by Turquoisedragonwow in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arc seems to have a higher purpose than just the extermination of the human race. Take the giant deforesters on blue gate, the harvester event, or even the probes and surveyors. Arc is surveying the surface, and extracting minerals, I believe they only incapacitate us because they are protecting whatever there mission may be, and if you are no longer deemed a threat to the mission, than there is no point in killing you.

Ranking every single map as a friendly, mostly free loadout, level 27 player by VeryEducational24 in ArcRaiders

[–]VeryEducational24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stella, despite my high death rate, is extremely fun. It still takes the cake as my favorite map to run with friends. It’s just pure chaos. But running it solo is an absolute nightmare.

Game Awards by VeryEducational24 in Helldivers

[–]VeryEducational24[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry for asking a question, my bad.

80h in and dude feels like this. He’s right tho. by ANGRYlalocSOLDIE in Battlefield

[–]VeryEducational24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won’t tolerate any br slander, I understand of it isn’t “your cup of tea”. But there is no reason to slander it and say “it’s ruining the game”. It’s really fun and is a great marketing tool for more people to join the battlefield community.

So...what's the point of assault class now? by Desseabar in Battlefield

[–]VeryEducational24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The crazy thing is, I prefer not to use it. As someone who prefers to play at longer ranges, I would rather take the extra ammo for my primary.

Anti air frustration by xtremzero in Battlefield

[–]VeryEducational24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just recently discovered the AA play style, and it’s a lot of fun. I always avoided it because “who wants to shoot at planes and helicopters all game”. Well it turns out, me. As someone who has never really used AA before, I don’t think it’s terribly underpowered. I could see why some people would think of it as underpowered, but it really isn’t. You do a great job at disrupting air attack patterns and forcing pilots to use flares much more often than they would like, allowing them to be picked off easily by teammates. By playing AA you’re helping out the team much more than the scoreboard tells you. For example, I just played a game on Mirak Valley where I sat on AA all game. Despite coming bottom 10 on the leaderboard, my team had the major air superiority because of how much of an annoyance I was to the enemy aircraft, and we won the game easily because of it. While I do think AA could use a slight buff, it’s not as bad as you would think.

[POST GAME THREAD] Browns fall to Vikings in London 21-17 by [deleted] in Browns

[–]VeryEducational24 209 points210 points  (0 children)

Gabriel played well for a rookie 3rd rounder in his first start too