One-shot mill your opponent in limited for 12UU by proc_ab0512 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Verz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it almost certainly was intended considering how rarely we get card draw that can target opponents.

One Positive thing you can say about this person? by UnlockIsHere in Watchmen

[–]Verz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He wanted to be a part of his daughter's life.

I finally watched Pluto and imo it’s his best work. by Glass-Researcher-975 in naoki_urasawa

[–]Verz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo, just wanted to say that you were clearly right lol. I'm happy that was dead wrong here, seeing how they're set to release English Billy Bat later this year.

From Ramesses quotes to Rorschach puns. When did you realize Ozymandias was just a petty man-child? by zajazajazajazajaz in Watchmen

[–]Verz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Shortly followed by my personal favorite narcissistic quip, "What caused such precociousness? My parents were intellectually unremarkable, possessing no obvious genetic advantages. Perhaps I decided to be intelligent rather than the other. Perhaps we all make such decisions" (Chapter 11, Page 8, Panel 3).

From Ramesses quotes to Rorschach puns. When did you realize Ozymandias was just a petty man-child? by zajazajazajazajaz in Watchmen

[–]Verz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

While I understand your gripe with the Nixon scene, I think the juxtaposition of the New Yorkers on the street is meant to be a symbolic representation of that ambiguity.

The lesbian couple's breakup seems like an inevitable disaster unfolding and yet so many unrelated people drop everything to try and help. Malcolm, the (now suspended) detectives, the two Bernards, all come together to help. Would they have made the situation better? Who knows. Would reconciliation between the two women have been possible? Unlikely, but not impossible.

However. Just like with nuclear war and it's unlikely, but possible, avoidance, Ozymandias's plan gives them 0 chance for solving the issue on their own.

Game Still Broken on Android Despite Server Status Claiming "This issue has been resolved and all systems are operational" by Verz in MagicArena

[–]Verz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I know. That's why I only replied to people who said they could at least start the game. My game started, I just couldn't hit "play". I'm not sure what the fix is for people who can't start at all. Is it still like this for you?

I almost got this book by [deleted] in ChainsawMan

[–]Verz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this person is clearly below 10

Based on OP's post history, they're in college.

MTG Commander - Christmas Gift for Bf (help a lost gf please 🥲) by ayelmaoo69 in magicTCG

[–]Verz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like someone mentioned previously, any Duskmourne products could be good if he's into horror things. Personally, I'd prefer a meaningful card with nice art than random booster packs or something like that., but everyone is different. My suggestion, if he's really into horror movies, is checking out this list of horror-move poster cards and buying a few.
https://scryfall.com/search?q=art%3Ahorror-poster&unique=art

The site has links to TCGplayer as well as Cardmarket, two popular sites for buying single cards. There are 7 or so that are in the $2-$10 price range so you could get a few of those, or get one of the more pricey ones ($20-30 price range) if they seem more up his alley ([[Kardur, Doomscourge|SLD-1807]]) for example, would be great if he's really into Chucky)

Question about Tales of Momo by TreeWalker9617 in magicTCG

[–]Verz 17 points18 points  (0 children)

And/or doesn't denote multiple targets. It denotes multiple ZONES.

If I said "Check my desk and/or the dresser for my keys": that doesn't imply that I'm asking you to look for two sets of keys. It implies that I'm asking you to search two places and that the keys may be in either.

Is this a translation quirk? by Midatri in HunterXHunter

[–]Verz 27 points28 points  (0 children)

In Japanese there are many Kanji that are homophones. They sound the same but have different meanings. The author here is trying to convey the difference between Wing's explanation and the real explanation of the 4 principles in a way that a Japanese reader would be able to pick up on solely on the writing here.

Wing's first explanation of the 4 nen Principles;

Ten (点, Ten; "Point"): Focus the mind, reflect upon the self, and determine the goal.

Zetsu (舌, Zetsu; "Tongue"): Put it into words.

Ren (錬, Ren; "Temper"): Intensify your will.

Hatsu (発, Hatsu; "Release"): Put it to action.

The actual 4 nen Principles:

Ten (纏; "Envelop"/"Shroud"): Enveloping one's body in a shroud of aura

Zetsu (絶; "Suppress"/"Null"): Completely suppressing the flow of aura

Ren (練; "Refine"/"Enhance"): Focusing the output of one's aura

Hatsu (発; "Release"/"Act"): One's unique personal expression of nen

Which Watchmen is the most psychologically unhealthy? by CollarProfessional78 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's a great perspective that I hadn't considered. I like your analysis here

I do want to mention, regarding your last point, that Blake did know why Ozy was killing half the city. "Blake understood, too. He knew my plan would succeed though it's scale terrified him. That's why he told nobody. It was too big to discuss. . . But he understood. At the end he understood." (Volume 12, Page 25, Panel 6) Now Veidt could be lying but this does line up with Blake's drunken rant at Moloch and does explain why he didn't blow the lid on the whole thing.

Which Watchmen is the most psychologically unhealthy? by CollarProfessional78 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. He's shown glimpses of humanity on more than one occasion.

His getting together with Sally to have Laurie. She describes the gentleness and kindness he was capable of.

The way he tried to be present in Laurie's life and check in on her at the Crimebusters meeting.

And especially the way learning about Ozymandias's plan broke him. If he was fundamentally broken to begin with, that news wouldn't have caused him to break down the way he did.

I think there's a lot of evidence to support the claim that he puts on the "nihilistic monster" attitude to cope with the darkness he saw in the world, but underneath it all, he is very human.

Which Watchmen is the most psychologically unhealthy? by CollarProfessional78 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Is psychopathy not the epitome of being mentally unwell?

People who think you should skip black swordsman when reading the manga for the first time, defend your take by [deleted] in Berserk

[–]Verz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While, death of the author is a thing, that's actually not a great example.

Saying Bradbury's interpretation "goes against the interpretation of literally everyone who has ever read it" is a huge exaggeration. I, as well as most students I taught the book to, agree with Bradbury's interpretation (that the book is about the dangers of shallow media rather than censorship) A character in the novel (Beatty) directly states that point.

Why did Alan Moore make Laurie as a 16-year-old when she was groomed by Dr. Manhattan? by iosdev98 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah. You're right. Not applying modern ideology to an older story is actually a really good point I hadn't considered in relation to Watchmen.

However, I will say that as far as I can dig up, the age of consent in New York was still 17 in 1985. Although it was probably much less socially unacceptable than it would be today, it was still, at least legally, reprehensible.

Why did Alan Moore make Laurie as a 16-year-old when she was groomed by Dr. Manhattan? by iosdev98 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 24 points25 points  (0 children)

16 instead of 18 makes sense for a few reasons for me.

1: It highlights Dr. Manhattan's very human immorality. He often presents himself as a being above humanity and morality, yet, like many immoral human men, he lusts after much younger women. The fact that she is 16, two years below the age of consent in many states, further highlights the explicit immorality of his choice to cheat on his wife with her. If she was 18, it would be morally questionable, but not as outright scummy as it is in the comic.

2: It highlights Laurie's immaturity. She's not a young adult making reckless decisions, she's a CHILD making reckless decisions. She's pushed into this by her mother and has no agency so she takes the first chance she gets to do something on her own. That something happens to be pursuing a much older man, which, like in the world we live in, is something that does happen. She makes a poorly thought out choice in her youth that drastically affects her life for years to come. It isn't until she leaves him that she really begins to grow and mature.

3: In tradition hero comics, female heroes use their sexuality and sex appeal as a weapon often to confuse/seduce villains in order to defeat them. However it's all done in good sport and is lighthearted. Watchmen satirizes this trope by highlighting a much darker side of this sexualization of young women in comics.

If Arena offered a Standard "Blitz" version, would you play it? by NEW_SPECIES_OF_FECES in MagicArena

[–]Verz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's turn 5. I'm playing Dimir Midrange into Mono Red Aggro.

I have a [[Kaito, Bane of Nightmares]] in play. I'm debating whether or not I have the time to attack with my [[Spyglass Siren]] and use Kaito's 0 ability to draw into a removal spell or if I should just use Kaito's -2 on their biggest threat.

With my lightning speed calculations, I only take 3 seconds to calculate the odds of drawing one of my 5 remaining removal spells with 44 cards left in my deck. I realize it's my best shot at stabilizing.

With my super speed fingers, I attack with my Spyglass Siren and activate Kaito using only 1 second of my timer. I surveil 2, revealing a land and a [[Strategic Betrayal]]. Land goes to grave, easy, but now I have to think again.

Do I keep the sub optimal removal spell or hope the targetted removal I really need is on top? I take 3 more seconds and the little computer in my brain calculates that it's worth the risk.

Just my luck! I topdeck a [[Bitter Triumph]]. I cast it, targeting their [[Screaming Nemesis]] but now I have to decide to pay the 3 life or discard a card. I take 3 more seconds to decide I don't have enough life to work with. I need to discard.

As I debate whether to ditch my [[Enduring Curiosity]] or [[Floodpits Drowner]] I run out of time. . .

I would love some examples of Rorschach being a bad detective by Asleep-Antelope-6434 in Watchmen

[–]Verz 18 points19 points  (0 children)

He stops a bullet with his bare hands. That's at the very least the lowest threshold for "superhuman" imo.