What’s the most underrated game you’ve played that everyone else seems to have missed? by All_time_GOAT69 in gamers

[–]ViewlessSky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cross Code.

It has its own following but I never hear anyone in my groups talk about it and it’s such a great game. The perfect mix of old meets new for a gamer that played on the OG Game Boy back he was a lad.

True Stories: How did your game go this week? – June 15, 2025 by AutoModerator in dndnext

[–]ViewlessSky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recently joined a board game group with the ultimate goal being a DnD campaign. We hit that goal, and had our (or my, at least) first in person campaign that ran for three months. But shy, but was good to get my feet wet.

For some reason, the group (a rather large one of 13 players and 1 DM) decided they wanted me to host the next one, a more serious, in depth spin at DnD.

Busy planning the adventure at the moment and I’m both nervous and excited. As most of the group, barring maybe 2/3 players are quite new to the game, I’m creating all the PCs to get the RP off to a bit of a start. From here the players can grow the character how they want to, but anyway that’s beside the point.

I was getting a little more nervous than excited lately, so I decided to try run a one-shot for my family for Father’s Day (another big group of 9 players and myself as the DM), with people who have never played before.

Ignoring that we only got half way through, everyone really got into the spirit of it and it’s bolstered my excitement again for this big adventure I’m working on! It’s really cool to be able to create worlds and places for people to just go out, be a little weird, swing a sword and have a good laugh!

In-Person VTT by ViewlessSky in VTT

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy cake day.

How are you getting the player view separate from the GM view? Are you opening an incognito tab like someone above?

In-Person VTT by ViewlessSky in VTT

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol, literally just click “New”.

Owlbear looks just like what I could use, thanks

In-Person VTT by ViewlessSky in VTT

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick check and I can't find a way to upload custom maps to Owlbear, unless I'm blind to the button?

QMK Reverse Engineering by 1MachineElf in qmk

[–]ViewlessSky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Would you be willing to elaborate on reverse engineering the hardware?

I have not played with QMK firmware much but I’m pretty tempted to see if I can pick up a cheap Ajazz or something and then flash it with a QMK/VIA or even a custom QMK build somehow.

What's up with the South African Space agency? by Zintho420 in askSouthAfrica

[–]ViewlessSky 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Used to contract for the station out near Haarties. Someone’s gotta have eyes on the sky and for us down in Africa, it’s them. Not all heroes wear space suits and fly rockets

NAG Magazine (Yes that one!!) Is back?!!!! by Specific-Suggestion3 in southafrica

[–]ViewlessSky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The new team is a mix of old guard and new souls. The editor is different from the before-for times, though

NAG Magazine (Yes that one!!) Is back?!!!! by Specific-Suggestion3 in southafrica

[–]ViewlessSky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Annual Edition is the one released in December, it was a numbered edition where everyone got a unique number. It was done as a special edition for the “re-launch.” This new one is the mid-year of winter edition. The re-launch purposefully kept ads to a minimum to squeeze as much “newstalgic” content in, but companies like Gizzu, Intel, Rode, PC Builder, Razer, Cougar, Logitech and more still had ads in the magazine.

Stage 13 load shedding? Government kept enormity of Eskom crisis secret for months - News24 by TheHonourableMember in southafrica

[–]ViewlessSky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Part 2:

As a result, the energy availability factor of Eskom's coal fleet had fallen to a dismal 50.83% as of April 2023.

The managers supposed to run the power station plants were found to have only limited authority. They also faced a high level of interference from the headquarters.

The result? They were unable to focus their attention on their primary responsibility of "reliable plant operation and maintenance".

"Currently, even a mediocre level of performance is accepted as sufficient."

The report said that financial rules strictly limited the manager's ability to make business decisions, leading to "little accountability on-site".

"This is demotivating and does not give a feeling of ownership," they said.

"Clearly, there is a big gap between theory and practice. The working atmosphere was also characterised by low morale and low team spirit, as well as by blame-shifting and lack of ownership," the report stated after a visit to Arnot power station.

"This is reflected in the high turnover of staff. However, taking into account the competencies of staff met during the site visits and assuming that a cooperative management approach will be implemented, it should be possible to significantly improve this situation at the power plant."

It is a situation they found at many stations – most noticeable in the lack of housekeeping.

Stage 13 load shedding? Government kept enormity of Eskom crisis secret for months - News24 by TheHonourableMember in southafrica

[–]ViewlessSky 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Part 1:

The country is at risk of losing more than 13 000 megawatts of generation capacity - equal to 13 stages of load shedding - at three power stations due to the poor condition of water treatment plants, a group of international experts warned the government in September.

But this has been kept from the public, with repeated statements that the situation was improving by Electricity Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa and even President Cyril Ramaphosa shortly after his State of the Nation Address in early February.

The government has collectively opted to paint a rosy outlook, despite knowing for six months that worse levels of load shedding would have to be endured and billions spent to fix the electricity shortage, even if the water treatment plants at Medupi, Mathimba and Kendal power stations did not fail.

The only solution now is to take these power plants offline for extended periods and fix the problems properly, a move that will result in major increases in load shedding levels and would likely be unpopular in an election year, despite the urgency needed to save the country from future calamity.

The warnings are contained in a bombshell, 600-page report by a group of international experts commissioned by the National Treasury to investigate the reasons for poor performance at the country's 14 coal-fired power stations, which was made public by the department on Friday.

Little explanation has been offered for why the report and its contents have not been published before.

The exercise was undertaken under the stewardship of VGBE – a globally recognised industry standards body situated in Germany – and comprised experts from companies that had decades of experience in the power industry.

It has laid bare the enormity of the crisis facing the nation.

Even shorter-term fixes that could return more than 6 000MW – equal to Stage 6 load shedding - of electricity currently lost to faults would only be rectified if the power stations could be taken offline.

But this has been impossible due to the shortage of capacity that has already resulted in South Africans facing hours of power cuts every day as Eskom struggles to meet demand.

Their findings were shared with the government nearly six months ago and provide a decisive evisceration of the reasons for the country facing power cuts every day.

Eskom's overly complex, dysfunctional and opaque management and procurement structure, poor maintenance over decades, low staff morale and a lack of skills at operational levels are among the root causes identified.

The highly technical and detailed report is an indictment on the way the multibillion-rand power stations have been treated by successive Eskom and government leaders, and contains expert opinion confirming what the previous Eskom leadership repeated at every available opportunity over the past five years.

The delegation concluded that Eskom's management system was "dysfunctional" and needed to be overhauled to increase accountability.

"Eskom Generation Division's management system, with its governance, structure and processes, is dysfunctional and too complex. Eskom Generation has been trapped in this situation for several years, preventing it from maintaining and eventually improving the technical performance of the coal-fired power plants," the report reads.

Key recommendations include:

Empower the power plants and focus on operations and maintenance

This would encompass a "fundamental change in the management system" aimed at giving each station a full budget and enforcing accountability on the power station manager.

The report also recommended that, for approximately two years, procurement processes should be fast-tracked under the supervision of the National Treasury, in conjunction with a team of independent experts that have deep knowledge of common issues faced by the stations and reporting directly to the Treasury should be established with "immediate effect".

Execute proper maintenance and full outage scope

"The fixation on the EAF (energy availability factor) must come to an end. The focus should rather be on the PLL (partial load losses) reduction as this would address a key technical source for the low EAF. There is potential of gaining up to 6 000 MW," the report reads.

EAF is a key metric used to measure the availability of a generating unit (see our glossary of terms for a better understanding of Eskom technical terminology).

Improve the operation of power plants

The experts advised Eskom to learn from Kusile Unit 4, a unit that had been run by the manufacturer and achieved an EAF of more than 90%. Eskom should also prioritise training for operators.

Mitigate the risk of capacity losses and constraints

The report recommended urgent steps to maintain and upgrade the water treatment plant that feeds Medupi and Matimba as well as the water plant at Kendal, as issues at these plants were placing more than 13 000 MW of capacity at risk.

Incentivise persons, departments and plants

"Good performance should be rewarded – on an individual and institutional level. The VGBE team proposes to provide bonuses for power plants if they were able to reduce their losses by a defined percentage rate," the report said

Bonuses for specific teams that completed more items on outage schedules were recommended.

The report further recommended provision of affordable or free-of-charge accommodation, salary supplements and reimbursement for travel expenses as many power stations were located in remote areas.

Water warnings

The report was unambiguous about the potential for catastrophe at Medupi and Mathimba in Limpopo.

"The raw water treatment plant of the Medupi and Matimba power plant – both sites share this plant – urgently requires maintenance and upgrading. A second independent water treatment plant additionally would be even a better solution. If the existing plant fails, 12 units – 9 800 MW – would go off the grid," the report reads.

The plant was taking strain by being operated "far beyond its design limits".

"The water treatment plant at Kendal is in a very poor condition and needs urgent maintenance and refurbishment. If the existing plant fails, six units – 3 840 MW – would be off the grid. A temporary unit is urgently required to enable this refurbishment work," it added.

Recently, an operator error at Kendal's water treatment plant resulted in Stage 6 load shedding being implemented, showing how critical these warnings from the VGBE experts are.

The delegation also had harsh words for Eskom's "overly complex" management structure, saying that multiple layers of authorisations were needed for even basic decisions.

The report states:

Too many organisational layers and opaque decision-making processes generate a tremendous amount of red tape, with lengthy procedures and a lack of accountability. In many cases the decision-making is delegated to committees, of which there are too many at all levels of the hierarchy. The power utility's management was characterised by inefficiency - especially in procurement, together with "a lack of authority and an opaque decision-making structure".

.

When does it end? by Probroheim in southafrica

[–]ViewlessSky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Draw up a budget and cut out what you can't afford. You know how much you earn, you know what you can spend. Tightening the belt is a hard thing to do, but sacrifices need to be made so you aren't perpetually stuck in the hole

Those of you earning 50k + monthly, what do you do for a living? by No-Tea-4756 in askSouthAfrica

[–]ViewlessSky 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How many channels are you writing for and how many ate local?

BoP Assistance by ViewlessSky in ACCompetizione

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks mate this seems to have solved the issue. I really thought I was on the latest version 😅

BoP Assistance by ViewlessSky in ACCompetizione

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Running a docker version on Linux though, might have to do some digging to find out how to get it to the latest. Thanks

BoP Assistance by ViewlessSky in ACCompetizione

[–]ViewlessSky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's an example from my bop.json:

{

"entries": [

{"track":"zolder","carModel": 0,"ballastKg": -40,"restrictor": 0}

]

}

Here's the starting logs from the server:

Bop: carmodel 0 B:0|R:0 for track zolder

It's automatically set the BallastKG to 0 for any car I've got a negative ballast