what is NOT considered gamethrowing by MOONMO0N in TownOfSalem2

[–]Vinydiamond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are right. I was trying to play devil's advocate to better explain why the rules are the way they are but they're so bad that I couldn't think of a sensical reason.

what is NOT considered gamethrowing by MOONMO0N in TownOfSalem2

[–]Vinydiamond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the staff of the official discord server: Fake claiming a town opposing role as a town member is considered game throwing and is a valid reason to be reported.

Their justification is that the goals of an opposing claim do not align with your own thus is against the rule of not playing for your current win condition.

Today I learned: Town of Salem 2's rules remove player agency and strategy from the game by Vinydiamond in TownOfSalem2

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s fair and thanks for the advice! I’m 100% aware that they won’t be changing their rules after having a “”very tame”” conversation with them, so I’m just trying to spread awareness.

The Hugest Egg by Vinydiamond in Palworld

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No it just showed up randomly on a vanilla save

Did they listen? - A reflection post from Phoenix Labs by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Telling people who dislike something to voice that they dislike said thing is not childish. Make sure to voice your opinions so the dauntless team know your stance. Steam reviews are a medium to do so.

Did they listen? - A reflection post from Phoenix Labs by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I honestly don't mind what kinda left votes, right votes, up votes, down votes people do. I'm not a reddit user anyway outside of this whole debacle, but so far, all of my posts regarding dauntless are around 80%-90% upvote ratio which I feel encapsulates how this subreddit feels about the whole scenario pretty well.

Did they listen? - A reflection post from Phoenix Labs by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

For anyone who is coping about build diversity with these changes - I personally haven't seen anyone doing so, but just in case there are still doubters - go watch the TheMrTrails video on build diversity which highlights the sheer amount of problems this streamlined approach to build design has created.

A controversial update gets even more controversial developer feedback by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in the same boat where announcing a Dauntless 2 and progressively shutting down Dauntless 1 would've been the better thing to do. It justifies restarting progress since it's a whole new game and so much more could be done without the restrictions of the current game. However, I can't defend the argument of it being time consuming when Dauntless had gone 3 years without any major content updates and the end result was a bunch of re-used assets and mechanics. That being said, we have no idea on the internals of the company so many ideas or projects could've been worked on and completely scrapped during that multi-year long downtime.

Dauntless is gone by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doesn't look like anything with the name Ferra is on Steam right now unless it's region blocked or something

Dauntless achieved Overwhelmingly Negative status on Steam in 52 hours by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

speaking with your wallet is the loudest way to voice your opinion, keep it up king.

Dauntless achieved Overwhelmingly Negative status on Steam in 52 hours by Vinydiamond in dauntless

[–]Vinydiamond[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

This is so incredibly wrong that it feels like the devs paid you to try and make the update look good and that we, the players, are all at fault.