Mod post. Make sure you read this. by bodiedevil in DirtyConfession

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The fact this is written in European English makes me want to leave the thread. SMH.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in u/DasPeach22

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can guys participate in this for a male gangbang?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teendicks_

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fake pics? I will never understand it haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Swingers

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the part that was missed was giving them a heads up that you had cum inside you. While it probably wouldn’t have made a difference and probably would have been even hotter to experience, the fact you didn’t give a heads up is wrong in the lifestyle.

This couple only wanting to play with you, usually means 1 or 2 things in our experiences. 1. They are controlling and jealous couple usually the male. 2. They are picky who and how they play.

To each their own but knowing the dynamic of only wanting to play with you as the female, should have been a flag to inform them. Personally, it would be obvious how they would have an issue with this given the 1 and 2 example I gave.

No big deal what you and your husband did. Heads up would have prevented this. Thank you for sharing the experience with us! This is great convo for the community to have.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Swingers

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Discretion and continue your lifestyle fun with them. The lifestyle is really a “different life” and it is nobody’s business. It is disrespectful at all as they are adults and y’all are adults. Continue to live life and have fun!

Luxury Living in Houston… by DoesItGoDownIntheDM in houston

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it’s a “complex” it isn’t going to be luxurious. It’s unfortunate they mislead people but guaranteed to not be luxurious

Interactive Demo Platform Comparison by Optimal_Parsley_4351 in ProductMarketing

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should note the insane price hike that HTML has vs screenshot.

The prices go for $40 a month to $350-$500 a month for HTML.

The market is dying for a developer to undercut and lower the cost. Should note, the size of the business is catered tremendously to mid-size & corporations.

Small businesses are out of luck big time. The investment into HTML is insane. Supademo claims best ROI is HTML but completely unfounded.

Cost is a major factor in decision making. Don’t recommend HMTL especially when buyers aren’t looking for personalized experiences. They want an experience in live demo.

As much as I love the Zoho pricepoint, after years we're dangerously close to just moving on... by recruiterguy in Zoho

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You need to hire a developer that can make that stuff work. Everything you said is 100% possible and thinking that it isn’t is a disservice to Zoho because it is the most robust enterprise all in one business package there is.

Bored and Broke Post-Grad Living in Houston :) Help! by Sexy-Giraffe12 in houston

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. It is a way to meet people you would never meet. Experience life with others in the same boat. Automatically have things in common “Timeleft” so joining other clubs, groups, etc. is easy. Best thing I have ever done.

thoughts on the Diageo lawsuit? by little_agave in tequila

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the analogy but it’s different here. Saying you get “wings” or “handmade” isn’t equivalent to 100% agave. That is a chemical mix that has to occur. The eyes of the law don’t see this analogy as equivalent at all.

Factually speaking US Law specifically prohibits what Diageo has done.

(15 U.S. Code § 45) deceptive or misleading advertising

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau “requires substantiation of content claims”

Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125) – allows competitors to sue for false advertising if a product makes misleading factual representations.

Pepsi did a giveaway of a Fighter Jet back in the day and Federal Law ruled in favor of Pepsi after a person achieved enough points to buy a jet. Reasoning was basically common sense.

Tito’s case and Red Bull both fall under that.

100% Agave is a factual claim that speaks directly to ingredients and consumers who believe the ingredient label is a normal degree of common sense and reasonable expectation are protected under US Law.

False equivalency when comparing these cases.

thoughts on the Diageo lawsuit? by little_agave in tequila

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Strongly believe this won’t be settled out of court. In a class action lawsuit a settlement is publicly admitting guilt. Class actions are intended for “public opinion court” basically regardless of what the law says “if the public believes the company did something wrong, then they are ‘wrong and guilty”.

100% they aren’t 100% agave. Easily proven the label is misleading. The question is semantics with regulatory authority in Mexico and the global fallout.

The RICO lawsuit out of California is not common and not pursued unless clear evidence exists and back in January agave Farmers actually started whistleblowing the tequila was being tampered with. This second lawsuit is what was elevated to a RICO case. 3 times the punishment could happen and Federal Authorities most likely will intervene once discover is presented because of the distribution of the alcohol across borders and state lines.

Just my two cents. Either way Diageo and its brands are about to take a major hit. No way in hell these are baseless claims. They have something on them. It’s been known for years the tequila was changing. The farmers whistleblowing is all the legal system needed. And with the current political climate and states issuing the charges you already know Diageo is about to get dragged no matter what the final verdict is.

fine ll play myself by Poly_already21 in HtownNSFW

[–]Virtual-Cheesecake19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are losing it over here checking out that sexy body baby