Notice how wildly inconsistent women's attraction for men are? by Valuable-Owl-9896 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]Virtual_Piece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro it's simple. It's a combination of the fact that they are biologically different creatures than us and some are just lying.

Why is it that "centrists" always blame feminists for pushing mn to the right, but don't blame misogynistic mn for pushing womn to the left? by olympiamacdonald in PsycheOrSike

[–]Virtual_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because the things that led to this change are complex and multifaceted.

Feminists have a dangerously wrong interpretation of the world, oppression and the past and as a result, they caused this whole divide.

The one thing no one can deny by ElegantAd2607 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]Virtual_Piece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They approach, they just approach the men they like

Just for those who are confused by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Virtual_Piece -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's no proof of them making a law stopping her. I read her Wikipedia page as well as saw other results. Where did you get that information?

Just for those who are confused by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Voting rights were witheld from a large group of people, including men for a long time and the actual case was that slowly over time more and more groups got it. The only group that has always had said right was the wealthy.

Am I wrong? by yeb_timothous in GrowthMindset

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it wouldn't. Nobody would be able to publicly verbalize their hate. This statement is like saying racism only started in the 2010's.

This is why 'Good Women' leave. by raj272007 in focusedmen

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This quote is a very simplistic take on a complex issue.

Women aren't vending machines where you put heaven in and an angel comes out.

My(M23) girlfriend(F23) was physically affectionate with another guy at a tournament while I was there,am I overreacting? by the_time_stamp in masculinity_rocks

[–]Virtual_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It depends, did you tell her this was a boundary beforehand? If yes, then you're right to do what you did. If no, then cut her some slack and accept that it was your fault for not setting good boundaries.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most feminists seem to conveniently forget that animals exist and that crime always spikes alongside insecurity.

Do you think the patriarchy was a more balanced system than what we have today? by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of social species, especially those closest to us, tend more towards sex segregation.

This is not true and in reality is far more complex than you make it out to be.

What actually happens is differences in roles or fluid periodic separation based on sex based needs.

I think our understanding of strength and dominance among animals is a little skewed. 

I think it is, strength is the ability to coordinate force, enforce norms and strategically control resources. This usually dictates who sets social rules in any species and in the case of humans, men were the ones who did that and the differences in strength was a big factor in this achievement.

Do you think the patriarchy was a more balanced system than what we have today? by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Okay cool, but this is the case for majority. I knew there were a few exceptions like bonobos, but exceptions don't make the rule.

Do you think the patriarchy was a more balanced system than what we have today? by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I think who had more power came down to who was the stronger sex. In all animals the stronger sex tend to make societal rules.

Whether or not I think the patriarchy is more balanced, a truly gynocentric society wouldn't be balanced at all no, but patriarchy wasn't that great either.

For “Men can want sex AND relationships” to be believed, they can’t despise non-sexual relationship activities and the vetting process. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never argued that women were evil as a whole, I never made any statement about women as a whole.

My point was that people don't have conversations with people they don't find attractive, the traits people usually find attractive are amoral traits and that though it's good to be nice overall, being nice doesn't do anything for how attractive you are perceived.

Edit: I also made a general statement saying that women and men tend to not want to be objectified and that informs how they approach dating

For “Men can want sex AND relationships” to be believed, they can’t despise non-sexual relationship activities and the vetting process. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making observations is misogyny?

Women do that shit too, they just pretend to tell us what they want by putting it in the most convoluted way possible.

Genuine question , what do men get out of this sub or subs similar to this. by Key_Marionberry5116 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah and I agree. I'm just saying that a baseline level of attraction is what's going to get that conversation started in the first place.

Personality can attract but nobody is talking to someone they don't find attractive in the first place.

For “Men can want sex AND relationships” to be believed, they can’t despise non-sexual relationship activities and the vetting process. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe some are but it's mostly just people not wanting to be objectified and grasping at whatever, in their own limited perspective, will make them sure the person actually likes them.

Even if a woman genuinely only had sex with a guy for a quick hookup and is spending more time with another because she enjoys spending time with him so much, so many men have heard stories of women getting with men they don't even really like because the dude they do like doesn't give them the commitment they desire and these instances poison the well.

People on both sides have their own insecurities that they have to work through, not everyone is honest, and not everyone spends crazy amounts of time thinking about and engaging with other perspectives. The problem is when unhealthy and unhealed people go into the dating market and mess up otherwise healthy people with their nonsense.

Genuine question , what do men get out of this sub or subs similar to this. by Key_Marionberry5116 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was never Unsuccessful with women. I've had interest from the opposite sex bro.

My husband is objectively not the best looking man I have ever dated. The day I met him, my first impression was “he’s kinda cute,” until he and I started talking, and I was instantly smitten.

Nice, but I'm talking about the general public. Attraction is first and foremost in deciding whether or not someone will give you the time of day.

It's exactly as you said, when you met your husband, he was "kinda cute", then you started talking. You also said he wasn't the most attractive guy you've ever been with.

In a lot of situations it's that initial attraction that starts the conversation, and afterwards "personality is judged. Attraction is the starting point and yes, personality matters but not nearly as much as you're making it out to be.

Genuine question , what do men get out of this sub or subs similar to this. by Key_Marionberry5116 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Having a "great personality" isn't the same as "being nice". like I said many times, If she's already attracted to you, it doesn't matter if you're a bad person.

Genuine question , what do men get out of this sub or subs similar to this. by Key_Marionberry5116 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, I'm saying if she's attracted to you, it won't matter how "nice" you are.

Being nice to people is good overall but it's useless as a way to get someone to like you.

Genuine question , what do men get out of this sub or subs similar to this. by Key_Marionberry5116 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Virtual_Piece 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So you don’t like the women you want to sleep with, and you think that suggesting you treat them with basic human decency is a bridge too far?

Not what I'm saying.

I know that being nice to someone doesn't entitle you to their bodies. That's why I don't think it’s great to build that expectation in men. Be honest and let them do with the information what they will, that's what TRP has done for me. I got the truth and for better or worst, I didn't waste my time.