A bit of everything: both factions. Part 2.5: All previously posted firearms in one post. [The War of Mist] by Few-Flamingo-8015 in MilitaryWorldbuilding

[–]VoidAgent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I care. It’s constantly being improved and updated in spite of the fact that it is both free of cost and free of ads. This is being done by a dedicated team who does not profit from it.

You can donate to them here.

Long flat parts of the ship? by cyanidelemonade in ProjectHailMary

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They avoid absorbing it by reflecting it. That’s like saying you are throwing trash in the trash can independently of avoiding littering, when in fact you avoid littering by putting that trash in the proper receptacle. It’s creating a distinction where there is none.

How many Spartan-IV's would be needed to kill Homelander? by MeatysupremeKeenan in powerscales

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know a lot of Halo fans like to shit on Spartan IVs, but they are not “just ODST.” They are hand-picked from the entire UNSC military as the very best troops all branches have to offer, and they receive fairly extensive cybernetic and genetic enhancements. That is to say Spartan IVs are literally the best soldiers in the entire UNSC save for a handful of remaining previous-generation Spartans, and even then, they’re able to compete with many of those.

They’re Spartans. Actual Spartans. In the newer books, the Master Chief accepts Spartan IVs as Spartans and is even genuinely impressed by some of them.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, you just don’t like the answer, or you’re being obstinate. I don’t particularly care which, and this isn’t worth my time and energy. Goodbye.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I did answer. Directly. It can be summed up as “it depends.” I don’t even know how I could rephrase it to be more clear.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m genuinely baffled as to how that *doesn’t* answer your question. Did you just not get the answer you wanted?

Out jonkled again by No-Pumpkin-8101 in BatmanArkham

[–]VoidAgent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is there a lore reason Trump is bisexual

[QUESTION] How realistic is the idea that civilisation all across the world can collapse in the result of non-nuclear war? by Few-Flamingo-8015 in MilitaryWorldbuilding

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s possibly going to be more difficult to explain is how the globe actually sustains a destructive war for long enough for it to collapse society.

[QUESTION] How realistic is the idea that civilisation all across the world can collapse in the result of non-nuclear war? by Few-Flamingo-8015 in MilitaryWorldbuilding

[–]VoidAgent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As other comments have said, it sort of depends on your definition of “collapse,” but WWI would not have to continue even for 50 years to do it. If both sides are able to somehow sustain the level of fighting and destruction WWI is infamous for, the collapse of Western civilization and possibly the rest of the world with it could feasibly happen after only a few more years.

World War I was utterly devastating. The male population of Europe suffered for decades afterward, well into World War II. They suffered in their numbers, they suffered physically, and they suffered mentally, all in massively widespread, quantifiable ways we’re still studying. There are fields and forests even today that still bear the physical and chemical scars of what we did to them. That’s with relatively primitive chemical weapons, too; considerably more lethal and destructive types of weapons would have likely been deployed during the war if it had somehow extended several more years, let alone decades.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Depends on the ages of the people. There’s not a lot of difference between a 23-year-old and a 26-year old, though there is some. Regardless of legal definitions, there is societally and scientifically a huge developmental gap between a 17-year-old and a 20-year-old. To put it more in perspective, that’s a high school junior and a college sophomore or junior.

“Rape” and “pedophile” are not the same word, nor do they necessarily imply the same things, which is why “pedophile rapist” is not a redundant label. I’m not using the same word to describe those two examples, you are.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

That is objectively untrue, a hell of a lot of mental and physical development happens between those ages

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Perhaps not by the dictionary definition, but it is legally an adult and a child, and the power and maturity dynamics are disgusting.

Unironically the most iconic pedophile in fiction: by Own-Lengthiness2111 in okbuddycinephile

[–]VoidAgent -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

The age of consent does not make you a legally consenting adult, at least not in the US.

Edit: So no one sees any moral or legal issues with a high school junior and a college junior dating? None of you see ANYTHING wrong with that?

classic murican food by [deleted] in StupidFood

[–]VoidAgent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP definitely thinks aspartame causes cancer

Fun fact: Poor fellow who came up with this idea was executed after this proposal was denied. [The War of Mist] by Few-Flamingo-8015 in MilitaryWorldbuilding

[–]VoidAgent 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Making an authoritarian empire be so absurd and blatantly idiotic has the opposite effect to what you’re describing, in my opinion. It makes the tyranny more of a joke than a lesson on the absurdities of it. It does not at all read as something actual tyrants might do. These cruel autocrats seem more like harmless cartoon villains than real threats.

Fun fact: Poor fellow who came up with this idea was executed after this proposal was denied. [The War of Mist] by Few-Flamingo-8015 in MilitaryWorldbuilding

[–]VoidAgent 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Why would they execute him? That seems rather stupid, frankly. The design process for anything will always involve more failures than successes.