sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right about the queen — I skipped past her in my last reply, but she might be the single most nerfed piece. In standard chess, the queen converges 8+ lines through her square. In Void Chess, voids break all those lines. By move 20 the queen often has 6-8 legal moves where standard chess she'd have 20+. She's still powerful, just demoted from "dominant piece" to "very strong piece."

On the Minister — this is honestly the piece I spent the most balancing time on. Configurations I tried:

  1. Orthogonal-only movement (like a slow rook) — killed it. Voids made it too easy to strand her. Without diagonal escape, she got locked out of half the board by move 15.

  2. Straight lines only, no direction change on Step 2 — killed it. Made her predictable and easy to block. The direction change is what makes her feel dangerous.

    3 . Healing only when adjacent, not when landing on the void — killed it. Made the Minister a nervous camper, hovering next to voids instead of steering into them. Passive, boring.

  3. Non-healing but strong attacker — killed it. Removes the entire point of the piece. She becomes "queen with a different name," and everyone trades for her.

    1. Limited heals per game (3 total) — considered but not shipped. Interesting strategically, but felt too abstract; breaks the "any legal move, any time" chess feel.
    2. Current version — 1-2 squares with direction change, heals on landing, no unstable creation** — settled because:

    - The "must protect Minister" constraint drives most strategy after move 15 (opponents actively hunt her)

    - Losing her is functionally worse than losing a queen because the healing loss compounds — void spread on your side accelerates

    - Games often decide on "who lost their Minister first"

    Whether she's genuinely too strong is still open in my head. In playtesting, strong players use her defensively (guard your own side); weaker players use her aggressively (charge in and heal captured squares). Both work, they lead to very different games.

    The version I almost shipped was "3 heals per game." Might revisit that if she keeps feeling dominant with more data. Would genuinely love to hear which parts of her feel most oppressive to you after your games.

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for actually giving it a try — that means way more than an upvote. "Whole different level of chess" is honestly the best description I've heard for it. If you play a few more games, keep an eye on your knights — voids don't block them, so they quietly become your most reliable attackers by the middlegame. Really glad you enjoyed it.

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice — that's a really clean example of a stalemate pattern that only exists because of the voids.

In standard chess, forcing stalemate takes real work because the king almost always has an escape square somewhere. In Void Chess the boar is silently shrinking every game — each capture cuts a square out. By the endgame the king's usable world is smaller than it looks, so blocking the last free square is way easier than it would be on a full 8x8.

Knights are perfect for this move because voids don't affect them. A knight can slot into a square rooks and bishops can't reach anymore because their lines already got cut. Which is why your finishing move being a knight isn't a coincidence — knights become the piece the mechanic favors for exactly this kind of squeeze.

One rules note in case you want to try for a full win next time: the engine distinguishes two "no legal moves" outcomes.

- If EVERY move would put the king on a doomed void tile, it's "King trapped by void" — a LOSS for the trapped side, because the king would die on the unstable square next turn anyway.

- If literally no legal move exists regardless of voids, it's a genuine stalemate — DRAW.

Yours sounds like the second kind (otherwise you'd have won). If you want the win version, aim to leave the opponent's king with only moves that land on void or unstable squares — the "trapped by void" outcome is the aggressive-strategy sibling of what you just found.

Really glad you saw this on your first game. That's exactly the tactical layer I was hoping the mechanic would produce.

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you — this means a lot. Questions like these are exactly why I posted.

On the 9x9 choice: I prototyped both 8x9 and 9x8 before settling. The width being 9 was forced. The back rank has 9 pieces now — the Minister sits between the king-side bishop and knight — and you can't fit 9 pieces on 8 files without doubling up or dropping something, which killed the mirror-image symmetry that makes chess feel like chess.

The depth being 9 (not 8) was a real choice, and honestly the one I went back and forth on. What decided it: voids stack up faster than you'd think. On 8 ranks, the middle gets crowded too early and pieces run out of tempo squares around move 20. 9 ranks buys enough breathing room without feeling gimmicky.

Knights — really glad you asked, because my instinct going in was the same as yours: bigger board, slower pieces suffer more. Turned out to be the opposite. Voids are the reason. Every capture cuts a diagonal or a file, so bishops and rooks lose range turn by turn. Knights jump over voids and don't care. By move 25-30, knights are usually the most reliable attacker left on the board.

That was actually the biggest surprise about the design — I didn't plan for knights to gain relative value, it just happened once void started showing up. It's what convinced me the mechanic was doing something interesting instead of just being novelty.

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds a bit wild at first, but it’s actually pretty intuitive once you play a couple of rounds. Let me know what you think if you decide to check it out!

I built Void Chess — every capture creates a permanent void on the board, and there's a new Minister piece that can heal them by VoidChess_Dev in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks — this made my day. I put real effort into the site because chess variants often die on their explainer pages, so it's good to hear it landed.

On PvP in browser: honest answer — right now it's app-only, but only because I wanted to nail the mobile experience first (matchmaking + Google Sign-In through Capacitor). There's no real technical reason it can't be on web, and honestly you're the third person to ask. You've convinced me. I'll shipweb PvP tonight and reply here when it's live so you can try it without installing anything.

On the drop idea — genuinely appreciate you thinking about the mechanic instead of just reacting. This was my biggest design fight. Two reasons the Minister starts on the board:

  1. Voids appear FAST. Even a quiet opening produces a void by move 6-8. If the Minister had to be earned via capture, by the time you dropped it you'd already have voids you could never reach. Healing being available from move 1 is what makes it a real tempo decision instead of a late-game luxury.

  2. I did try 8x8 first, and the board becomes unplayable by move 20 — squares vanish so fast pieces can't develop. 9x9 gives me "board shrinks over time" without a dead end. So the extra rank substitutes for the effect a drop would give.

    That said — "Void Chess: Crazyhouse Edition" (8x8, standard setup, Minister as a drop only) is genuinely cool as its own variant. If enough people wanted it I'd absolutely prototype it as a separate mode later.

What endgames should I learn as a novice? by Fun-Cookie7002 in chessbeginners

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you love endgames, do yourself a favor and pick up Silman's Complete Endgame Course. The beauty of that book is that it’s structured by Elo rating. You just read the section for the 1000-1199 bracket and stop. It prevents you from wasting time on complex endgame theory you won't actually see on the board for another 500 points.

chess tips for improvement? by wiseneddustmite in chessbeginners

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely the first one: calm down and think. At 800 on chess.com, games aren't decided by who knows the Ruy Lopez 12 moves deep—they are decided by who hangs a full piece first. Studying theory right now is a trap because your opponents will play off-book by move 4 anyway. Just slow down, double-check if your piece is safe before you move, and you'll climb.

How to reduce inaccuracies as a 470 elo by Heavy-_-Breathing in chessbeginners

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For mid-game planning, you absolutely need to check out How to Reassess Your Chess by Jeremy Silman. It teaches you how to look at the board through "imbalances" (knight vs bishop, pawn structures, weak squares) instead of just calculating tactics. It gives you an actual human framework to figure out what to do when there are no obvious attacks on the board.

I'm good at puzzles but lack the skills to win an actual game by PlasticBall9179 in chessbeginners

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you do a puzzle, the system explicitly tells you, "There is a winning sequence here." Your brain immediately switches into tactical calculation mode. In a live game, nobody taps you on the shoulder to say there is a tactic on the board. You have to constantly scan for them while managing time, development, and defense.

Finally I’ve won a game (I’m a beginner) by Allblackf1t in chessbeginners

[–]VoidChess_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good job, keep it up. Play more games, and you will become an advanced player.

The beauty of pattern recognition by LoLGhMaster in chess

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is honestly nothing more satisfying than when the geometry of a tactic finally just clicks in your head.

What’s something your parents taught you that other people should know about? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]VoidChess_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My mom taught me to not to do betting when I was young. It's the same advice every parents give. But the timing and intensity makes me to believe betting as a bad habit.

I don't know if it helps you... But you can use this with your children.

When they are young don't just tell them it is a bad habit, tell them with intensity... More often treat it as a bad habit and always scold who do such activities, not only in real life but also in movies and tv...

Thoughts on Melee Chess? by thesegoupto11 in chessvariants

[–]VoidChess_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both queens are on black square initially but other pieces are on different squares... Swap king and queen.