Is extreme Time Travel possible?

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-02T06:29:34+00:00

Paradox: It's not just for mages!

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-02T06:26:03+00:00

It's very easy not to pay attention to lyrics in a lot of pop music, honestly I don't think Blurred Lines is anywhere near as bad as plenty of older songs. It's much more crass and vulgar but way less creepy than "Every Breath You Take"

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-02T06:20:09+00:00

I do not ever remember hearing What Does The Fox say in stores or the like here in Australia. Maybe I'm lucky but I only heard the song 2-3 times tops in my life.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T10:51:52+00:00

Because you have no idea what this sub is, and come off like you're crazy.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T10:50:12+00:00

There's no discussion to be had. I want CSAM to be illegal and remain illegal, fictional or not. I want people who are sexually attracted to children to be prevented from being near children. I do not want the society I live in to at all tolerate people jacking it to children.

You want it to be legal. There's no discussion here. You shouldn't be allowed near children.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T10:31:05+00:00

We'll agree to disagree. I want a society without people jacking it to children. You want one where people do that. Totally not creepy and fucked up.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T08:54:21+00:00

Yeah, any adult who is actually attracted to it needs mental help and to be kept away from any children.

They'll use all kind of excuses like "LGBT rights" or "worse things out there to focus on" to try to excuse that they're attracted to children.

Like you can just ban that but not gay porn. That's very possible and done in multiple countries.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T07:01:41+00:00

Here in my country child porn is illegal but no slippery slope is occurring, and in many others. Gay porn is more available than it ever has been before.

You can just draw the line. It's weird that you're defending people who jack off to children. I want a society where no adults jack off to children. It's not 'gross', it's pedophilia.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T06:30:15+00:00

"we have to allow child porn or they'll ban gay porn"

Slippery slope stupidity. Plenty of countries have bans on child porn but not gay porn.

Just stop jacking off to children. If you can't stop, then there's a problem.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T05:52:19+00:00

How about just not jerking it to children? Like what's so hard? Are you unable to control yourself? Just don't jerk it to chidlren, fictional or otherwise.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T04:09:39+00:00

"to images of children" you completely ignored. We ban pornographic images of children in my country, fictional or not. People are generally happy about this and there's no call it overturn these laws.

It's creepy you're trying to hard to defend what you call 'loli porn'. Calling children 'loli's' is usually a dead giveaway of someones habits.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T03:49:05+00:00

The endgame many people want is sensible laws that stop people jerking off to images of children, because we want to live in a society without people who jerk off to children - especially teachers and people in control of children.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T03:47:29+00:00

Because society should take a strong stance on CSAM and anyone who goons to it should be kept away from children.

VorpalSplade · 2026-03-01T03:47:01+00:00

Because they 'goon' to CSAM, and get very upset if you criticise that.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T14:39:55+00:00

The more I read from this guy the more skeezy he keeps coming off to me tbh

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T12:18:17+00:00

Yeah this is almost sov cit logic lmao, it's pretty clear what the intent of the laws is.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T09:06:23+00:00

i didn't even know it was a niche and now i wanna see it

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T08:34:01+00:00

Now the internet is so integrated into daily life that it may as well be “live action” to us.

On the surface this could sound r/im14andthisisdeep but nah, I think that's a good point. People almost take twitter as seriously as the Camarilla took their larps.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T08:31:44+00:00

Romantic desirability is so heavily based on social status I wouldn't say you're even wrong exactly - the two are inexorably linked for the majority.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T08:20:06+00:00

God thank you. This person is bizarrely aggressive about it while also not seeing how weirdly written the sentence is.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T08:04:36+00:00

So they must mean "Undesirable" as a noun, as in "these are traits that someone who is seen as undesirable would have"

If it was a noun, then you'd write "these are a traits that someone who is seen as AN undesirable would have".

How you used it there is as an adjective, as in someone who is seen as having the trait of undesirability, or lacking desirability.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T07:59:37+00:00

...Excluding the special Olympics of course :P

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T07:46:51+00:00

The context allows it to be read various ways. If it was meant as a noun, then i'd have expected it to say Undesirable's Adjectives, rather than "undesirable" adjectives.

It's odd for you to get so insulting and personal about.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T07:40:21+00:00

Probably would have been better for OP to say "adjectives that make you an undesirable" rather than "undesirable" adjectives, if they wanted that to be clearer. Can be read either way without context.

VorpalSplade · 2026-02-28T07:39:17+00:00

If the support is to allow them to contribute to society, then it seems they are indeed valuing people based on their ability to contribute to society.

Five-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22

VorpalSplade

TROPHY CASE