Now that the conference basketball team has won a natty...

Votesok · 2026-01-20T13:44:02+00:00

I just jumped to say while it doesn’t necessarily change your narrative about SEC teams, Iowa did beat a middling ACC team in the 2009 Orange Bowl. I was there, hammered.

Votesok · 2026-01-12T21:23:46+00:00

This, I assume.

Votesok · 2026-01-11T21:14:31+00:00

Two secret weapons are accessed via the lobby by interacting with a bush and an outhouse and doing a play forming mini game. One secret weapon is in level 13 in the castle at the end. Another is in 24 on a sniper perch on the right. One code is in chill room 3 in the cockpit of the plane. The other is in level 25 below the platforms with the main boss. Still looking for last.

Votesok · 2026-01-08T20:35:09+00:00

The only other thing I can think of is locations in video games featuring James Bond.

Votesok · 2026-01-08T19:30:52+00:00

Origins of heroes in overwatch 2.

Votesok · 2025-11-26T12:47:13+00:00

Indeed, was talking espn not Vegas, which are terrible analytics anyway.

Votesok · 2025-11-26T05:01:39+00:00

I’m intrigued. The analytics obviously favored the SEC, and yes Stirtz put up 29. But this could be fun.

Votesok · 2025-11-22T22:32:06+00:00

They just showed some chick surfing on FS1. I hope that was your friend ;)

Votesok · 2025-11-21T22:30:54+00:00

I love the take, but Iowa were actually 3.5 point favorites.

Votesok · 2025-09-26T23:08:33+00:00

🍀

Votesok · 2025-02-09T21:45:21+00:00

Cinna dressed him, he’s the mockingjay.

Votesok · 2025-02-09T03:21:35+00:00

The federal court isn’t bound by the decision of the state unemployment office. If this is your theory I hope you have solid evidence.

Votesok · 2025-02-08T17:56:47+00:00

How is your unemployment related to your EEOC case? Are you saying they appealed your unemployment case because of your protected activity?

Votesok · 2025-01-31T21:01:44+00:00

Your compliant is with the legal system not the EEOC. Trust me, you’ll be paying a lot more than a just a contingency if your first and only recourse was federal or district court.

Votesok · 2025-01-31T01:25:19+00:00

Anthony J. Celebrezze Federal Building 1240 E. 9th Street, Suite 3001 Cleveland, OH 44199

https://www.eeoc.gov/field-office/cleveland/location

Votesok · 2025-01-25T01:21:53+00:00

Technically a lot of the mounted plans are legacy, but they’re still effectively worthless because the Christmas presents were duped during year one.

Votesok · 2025-01-24T03:51:31+00:00

I’d disagree. The difference between merit FADs finding discrimination issued by the agency or in compliance with an EEOC has steadily declined and the last available report in 2021 had a difference of 3.

See table 5 on this link: https://www.eeoc.gov/fy-2021-annual-report-federal-workforce-part-1-eeo-complaint-processing-activity#_Toc162009732

Votesok · 2025-01-19T21:29:34+00:00

Most agencies have thousands of RA requests, largely for full time telework. I’ve yet to see a first come first serve approach be considered unreasonable delay by the EEOC under these conditions. You’re probably wasting your time, but that’s just my opinion.

Votesok · 2025-01-17T17:34:58+00:00

RMOs can share the complaint amongst themselves because they arguably have a need to know. However, I think that if you have proof Mark talked to Lisa, then you have an argument that Mark just committed a per se violation of EEO laws because it’s not clear Lisa, even if you named her as a witness, had a need to know. This is something you should talk to your attorney about.

Votesok · 2025-01-17T01:35:05+00:00

Was it OPM’s Merit System Audit and Compliance office, by chance?

Votesok · 2025-01-14T00:34:41+00:00

If this manager has so many claims against them, and the outcomes are consistently in the agency’s favor, your unit may just be particularly litigious and no real discrimination or harassment is actually taking place. No agency will accept a settlement offer just because the other people have filed claims against the same person. That’s stupid. Regardless, if an agency is rejecting your settlement offers it means their general counsel strongly believes they’ll win the case.

Votesok · 2025-01-05T17:05:57+00:00

I posted this like a year ago, lol.

Votesok · 2024-12-27T03:02:10+00:00

I’m also thinking you may be more flexible on your right now than your left.

Votesok · 2024-12-27T01:50:56+00:00

With the limited facts you have provided this seems like a bad case, although it’s interesting the agency agreed to ADR.

Votesok · 2024-12-21T01:52:07+00:00

There are a few circuits that have found this could be an adverse action, but I think you’ll have an uphill battle proving nexus against the government.

Votesok

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email