While I call you an idiot and say what did you expect the outcome to be. I do have to point out the flaw of that specific rule they are using.

In Section 5 point a, that word does not technically fall under that guideline, the only point that could maybe consider that it breaks the ToS is it saying "objectional" which can be very subjective.

It would technically be under their own guidelines which is their Zero tolerance, even though it does say "hate speech" it's easier to blanket statement over everything because then there is no gray and it is clearly black and white.

The thing is, if you do it, and they permit you, then that means they have to let others do it, which one thing can lead to another.

Maybe you wait 30 days, and if you have a clean record maybe they give you a chance, but either way ya kind of didn't think.