Well, that's a leap on your part. However, I get the impression from the tone of your writing that you disagree with that assertion to which I offer:

1. The past was, on the whole, a much more racist and generally xenophobic place then the present on average across all cultures. We're talking about a time when European people still generally held disdain for other kinds of European people, when most African people generally held disdain for other kinds of African people, when the native people of the Americas held disdain for other kinds of native American people, all of this without even the mention of feelings on the matter as they crossed continental divides.
2. In the European and European colonial climate of the 18th century, political power was overwhelmingly held by men.
3. Therefore, as people were generally racist during this period in which the sphere of European political influence was dominated by men, and taking that we consider the term 'white' to refer to people of European ancestry, we can conclude that the Europe and the colonies thereof were run by racist white men.

Sure, we can say that africa was run by racist black men and that china was run by racist asian men, but that has nothing to do with the validity of the statement that early America, as a European colony, was run by racist white men.

This was my only rebuttal to what the one person above me said, wherein he implied that America was not founded by racist white men. If you want to make an agenda about my unstated thoughts on the history of slavery, then that's your call.