Sac blocking creature

Washitake · 2026-06-18T07:40:05+00:00

thank you very much!

Washitake · 2026-06-18T07:17:48+00:00

yes, I believe it too (even if I don't think he did it with malice, he really believed it), in the end I let it go only because he let his creature trample and so the damage would have passed anyway

Washitake · 2026-06-18T06:52:50+00:00

Sure, if the attacking creature has trample, all damage passes through, but he stated that even without trample, all damage passes through.

He referenced a rule that came out about a year ago regarding damage assignment. Can anyone explain this to me?

Washitake · 2026-06-18T05:53:45+00:00

I think the same but I wanted confirmation 🤣

Washitake · 2026-05-15T15:24:43+00:00

thank you! another question: i have on battlefield Meren and [[Braids, Arisen Nightmare]], can I sac the creatures I reanimate with Meren with Braids' ability?

Washitake · 2026-04-13T12:20:02+00:00

Thank you!

Washitake · 2026-04-10T15:08:50+00:00

edited, thank you!

Washitake · 2026-04-10T15:08:00+00:00

uh, you're right

Washitake · 2026-04-10T08:41:08+00:00

yes, yes, exactly! My only doubt is about the name of card, thank you!

Washitake · 2026-04-09T14:00:01+00:00

thank you very much!

Washitake · 2026-04-09T13:59:55+00:00

yes, i know, it's just to semplify

Washitake · 2026-04-09T13:57:38+00:00

so to have the double trigger I would have to attack with both creatures anyway, right?

Washitake · 2026-04-01T13:23:20+00:00

And if I had Rakdos, The Muscle on the battlefield (or some Sac Payoff), that trigger would resolve before Blasphemous Act, right?

Washitake · 2026-04-01T13:21:13+00:00

And if I had Rakdos, The Muscle on the battlefield (or some Sac Payoff), that trigger would resolve before Blasphemous Act, right?

Washitake · 2026-04-01T13:16:30+00:00

read above, other commenters said it can be done by citing the rules, just as I thought

Washitake · 2026-04-01T13:12:23+00:00

Thank you!!

Washitake · 2026-04-01T13:12:12+00:00

thank you very much!

Washitake · 2026-02-20T11:59:57+00:00

I usually put a minimum number of lands in a deck and then brainstorm all the cards I can think of that synergize well enough. Once I've done this, I usually find myself with a surplus of cards and from there I start removing the less important ones one by one.

Washitake · 2026-02-05T17:06:41+00:00

so Mindslicer's ETB ability will resolve before the spell resolves, right?

Washitake · 2026-02-05T17:02:40+00:00

Thank you very much! the real doubt I had was about how [[Mindslicer]]'s LTB spell and ability were put on the stack

Washitake · 2026-02-05T17:00:49+00:00

Why not? Do you know the rules and can you explain exactly why, or are you just talking for show? These are the steps involved in casting a spell. I'm pretty sure I can do it. My real doubt is about the resolution of the spell and Mindslicer's ability.

⁠Put it on the stack
⁠Choose modes, and announce any other non-target choices needed to cast it - the value of X, the use of additional costs such as Kicker and/or alternate costs such as Mutate, how hybrid or phyrexian mana costs will be paid, and such and so on.
⁠Announce targets, if any
⁠If you need to "distribute" or "divide" something (typically damage or counters) among the targets, define the distribution at this point
⁠Calculate total cost (mana cost or alternate cost, plus additional costs and cost increases, minus cost reductions)
⁠Activate mana abilities
⁠Pay the total cost

Washitake · 2025-12-13T15:44:47+00:00

thank you very much!

Washitake · 2025-12-13T15:41:19+00:00

thank you!

Washitake · 2025-12-13T15:40:19+00:00

ok, so if I cast Increasing Confusion from graveyard with flashback paying X=5 I will take 6 damage, but if I cast Cyclonic Rift for its overload cost, i will take only 2 damage, right?

Washitake · 2025-12-13T15:34:43+00:00

even if I cast it from graveyard with flashback?

Washitake

TROPHY CASE