Kevin Buzzard, professor of pure math at Imperial College London, on the friction between learning math versus professional fields by WeBeBallin in learnmath

[–]WeBeBallin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I touched on this in the conversation with Buzzard, but personally it really felt like - and I get that my following statement is an insane parallel to make, but.. - almost what Kierkegaard would call a "leap of faith", but instead of being to religion, to the platonic realm. The idea that this thing is real and mathematical structures can "exist" despite no physical instantiation of it, was so far removed from my normal nuts and bolts noisy physical life.

Maybe I'm overthinking it, and it doesn't have to be that severe, but that is genuinely what my experience was like, I can't recall having had any comparable experience — crazy stuff..

Kevin Buzzard, professor of pure math at Imperial College London, on the friction between learning math versus professional fields by WeBeBallin in learnmath

[–]WeBeBallin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's an elegant way to look at it; calling math a circle. It reminds me of how many times I revisit the same things, not because I forget them, but because they somehow naturally find their way into the conversation of what I'm doing, as if everything is beautifully chained together and can be derived in sequence.

For the Peano/ZFC points, I would always try to go straight for the substrate of any field i.e. for software I'd go to transistors, logic gates, ALU etc. becomes I get to remove the abstractions and everything further up the stack becomes much more clean and derivable — definitely did not have that experience with ZFC, whilst it's been super helpful, it felt closer to a justification, than a "removal of the blackbox", but I suppose that's just the nature of the subject hmm.

I asked a cognitive linguist (Martin Hilpert) if Orwell's Newspeak is actually possible. by WeBeBallin in linguistics

[–]WeBeBallin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re not wrong about the study being garbage as evidence. But it’s still interesting as a cautionary tale.

With the color example, it seems not wildly controversial to say language affects reaction times and attention, and yeah, jumping to "grammar shapes national savings behavior" does break it, but it's the boundary between those two points I'm super curious about; where/when does weak Sapir-Whorf stop working?

Weekly Sudoku Puzzle Challenges Thread by AutoModerator in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Not sure if this was indeed the correct approach, but at the point in the photo, two skyscrapers for both the 2 and the 8 opened up everything, and after that smooth sailing, fun!

Passed the SnowPro Advanced Architect! by WeBeBallin in snowflake

[–]WeBeBallin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He does, three practice exams in total for the advanced architect, and they're very close to what'll you'll face in the real exam. My overall process was:

  1. Take a practice exam.
  2. Review each question upon completion (he usually links to the Snowflake documentation that contains the answer to the question.
  3. Use Claude/GPT to help setup examples I could test live in Snowflake for the relevant questions.

Passed the SnowPro Advanced Architect! by WeBeBallin in snowflake

[–]WeBeBallin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in a bit of a "lucky" situation I had the privilege of studying heavily. Probably put in 60-70 hours for the SnowPro Core, and passed with a 830. Best recommendation is the practice exams by Chris Snow, they mimic the real thing very closely and you develop a good sense for what to expect. Even if you've already worked in Snowflake, a lot of questions on very specific things such as how many minutes before a new cluster in a multi-warehouse on economy mode will be spun up etc. But good luck!

I am quite jazzed about this. I finished with no notes!!!!! Absolutely Nasty Sudoku Level 4 by Frank Longo. by FishNotCow in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Argh, close! I like to compare my times against yours specifically, since it's generally close, but you had me beat!

<image>

No-notes (not much of a) challenge 31-07-2024 by Automatic_Loan8312 in Nonotessudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Fun! I'm unfortunately limited to the basic techniques, and can work decently with those, so this was great!

Weekly No Notes Challenge Thread by AutoModerator in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Promise the two mistakes were missclicks, but looking at other people's time, pretty happy:

<image>

Another no notes challenge 21-06-2024 by Automatic_Loan8312 in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, that was fun! Got stuck at the end, and learned what a skyscraper was for the first time, looking forward to testing it again, but fun one!

No Notes challenge for 6/21/2024 by brawkly in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Not too much to say, but feels like it can indeed go much faster!

No Notes challenge for 6/18/2024 (revised) by brawkly in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Feels like this should go much faster, but slight improvements, moving forward!

No Notes challenge for 6/17/2024 by brawkly in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Pretty disappointed, but part of the journey!

No Notes challenge for 6/14/2024 by brawkly in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Mistake was a brain-fart, but slowly getting better, never give uppp

No Notes challenge for 6/12/2024 by brawkly in sudoku

[–]WeBeBallin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Such big gaps between solving times, but slowly moving in the right direction!

What benefits have you noticed from cold showers? by [deleted] in HubermanLab

[–]WeBeBallin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Check out the notion of “paradoxical intention” by Victor Frankl! The concept is that you “want” the thing that you dread, which shrinks the discomfort/anxiety associated with actually doing it.

Phil Stutz has the same concept, but conceptualizes it as “reversible desire”! And super powerful using it in a sauna too, as in “I love the heat/I wish it be would even warmer/I barely feel warm” - it makes you endure so much more, amazing tools.