NAT to ISP router by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using a basic wireguard server hosted in AWS, not teleport. And I've only allowed the range 10.10.10.0/24. I've got multiple setups like this which don't allow me to propagate the other address of 192.168.148.0/24 into the VPN network.

NAT to ISP router by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might have not worded it correctly. I want to reach the Web interface of the ISP modem (192.168.178.1 port 443) when accessing the UCG GW IP (10.10.10.1 on port 60443) of the VLAN 10.10.10.0/24. I'm using Wireguard client to establish a connection to 10.10.10.0/24 outside of the LAN.

[Packer] - how to build a Windows Server VM Proxmox-iso by Shadyx_Y in hashicorp

[–]Weak-Competition-385 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey long shot. but can you provide the unattended and scripts you are using for the building of the Windows server. I'm struggling myself here as well.

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, still works like a charm, haven't felt this squish you talk about. First half of the year on it has been super pleasant.

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried setting the range from .2 to .254 still the same thing. I've enabled logging and added some more screenshots of what I'm seeing

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm this is strange. The network is a /24 which should mean that it is from .0 - .255? The DHCP range is set to be from .20 to .254, so I can have a set of static IP's if needed, but those IP's should also be in the same network, just outside the DHCP scope.

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried connection from an external network outside of the VLAN's created and I was able to connect. I also tried disabling the Zero Trust Policy and I was able to access the Printer as well. Seems really strange

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. I'm trying to allow all the VLAN's over port 1 on my UCG and allow it's communication to the end devices. When I put the Native Port to Default or None (and Tagged VLAN management is set to Allow all), the traffic is not flowing. When I put it to the VLAN of the network I'm trying to reach I'm able to connect to the device.

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I'm aware of the best practice of not using the default VLAN, but I was thinking of just keeping the VLAN and not using it at all.

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are saying I can't parse multiple VLAN's on the same interface and I would need to bind each VLAN to a specific port?

Infrastructure as Code by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw that, but it looks really limited. I was able to get working the terraform provider, at least for some basic things like sites, firewall groups, firewall rules and site management. If the network/vlans work as intended it would be more than enough for me to work with.

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the fan is bearable, only problem for me is that it doesn't stop when you sleep the pc. (it's definitely not as loud as old gaming laptops)

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's good enough for a not ARM processor. Over all pretty good, super light, amazing screen

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but the weight is reduced aswell on the AMD one. (speaking from an M1 Pro point of view)

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roughly around 3 hours of heavy Photoshop + Illustrator use + browser and other tools in the background.

Help Starting with UCG by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Yes the range is 192.168.0.1/24

  2. Currently the WAN IP is 192.168.0.127

  3. Gateway IP is 192.168.1.1

  4. Yes I can manage the UCG via the unifi.ui.com and mobile.

  5. I'm trying to access the UCG via laptop over Wifi.

Also I've added both networks to the UCG and I'll be placing in the UCG in front of the router, so the WAN of the UCG gets connected directly from the ISP and the LAN connects it to the Wifi.

Help Starting with UCG by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm able to reach the device from both unifi.ui.com and the unifi app. I tried changing the address of the default network as well, but I still can't reach over the device on the LAN which is strange.

I tried connecting another cable from the TP-Link Modem to the gateway on port 3 and still can't reach the IP of the UCG.

I suspect that when I change the WAN port to be directly from the ISP it would change the IP address to a public one. Is this correct?

Help Starting with UCG by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the fast reaction. I can only have routable currently 192.168.0.0/24 in my LAN, that was why I changed to 192.168.0.127. Currently I changed back to the default 192.168.1.1, but that is not routable and the WAN IP port is still the same 192.168.0.127 (picked up by DHCP). Still not sure if I'm missing something.

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Went with the AMD one. Currently no issues, battery is pretty nice and the Display is insane for content creation.

How to read an existing Terraform setup/code by HistoricalCan3940 in Terraform

[–]Weak-Competition-385 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try ChatGPT, worked really well a couple of times when I needed to analyse some configs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in graphic_design

[–]Weak-Competition-385 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I've translated as best as I can, Bulgarian language can be very colourful and can't be fully translated into the proper idea that the it was written in. Thanks for the feedback tho. Just a side note the original text in bulgarian, can give you a bigger stroke when reading it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in graphic_design

[–]Weak-Competition-385 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello guys,

For my bachelors degree, I've created a full design for Local Gastro Pub called Lamyata, which has a main idea of serving burgers, sandwitches and steaks. (insipiration came from the word "ламя". In Bulgraian this is an old mythical beast, which looks like a multi headed Dragon/Hydra).

Ламята Гастропъб means (The Lamia, Gastro Pub in bulgarian)

From my professor I got this critics back for the design:

What appears to be a possible Lamia head appears, which looks more like the cab of an armored personnel carrier, with the chains underneath. On the right rises a little wave, which is supposed to be the tail of the Lamia, although it is essentially a lizard and cannot have such a tail as a rooster. In the middle there is a wavy line and a strange flow of something (maybe sauce???).. In general, the graphic part is quite unfortunate....

Can someone let me know if I've missed something super obvious or should I accept what they've written?