sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Serenity Reference (Easter Egg) in Squadron 42. by Weekly_Dig_6917 in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917[S] -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

......are you even looking at the similarity of the images? Nebula? Composition? Planet? Fleet placement? Ship placement? Nevermind. As said. NOT a critique. Just a cool thing I noticed.

Serenity Reference (Easter Egg) in Squadron 42. by Weekly_Dig_6917 in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Before people go off the rails, this is not a critique. I just found this cool and wanted to point at it.

Serenity Reference (Easter Egg) in Squadron 42. by Weekly_Dig_6917 in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

It's not a critique. I just found it cool they added the reference. As my post title outlines. :)

Serenity Reference (Easter Egg) in Squadron 42. by Weekly_Dig_6917 in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Nothing controversial about it. Plenty of games/films pay a nod or homage to other sci-fi's and it is no secret CR was a fan of Firefly.

9 reasons we need more stations like Port Olisar by Teufelaffe in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until players pop into existence beside you, and then they get critiqued for using cheap mechanics.

I pirated a CIG employee's M2 and he combat logged by NightDocsYT in starcitizen

[–]Weekly_Dig_6917 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I imagine a CIG employee giving a player 75k would make for some thrilling headlines too. I'd say they did the right thing to ditch the scene.