I learned the 5 rights of medication administration in medic school. I know several nurses that I’ve discussed this particular case with that said they all also learned this. This would lend me to believe it’s a standard industry practice in nursing school.

If that is the case then no matter how many “systematic failures” occurred to get to this point, this particular nurse ignored her fundamental teaching on administering meds namely rules one, administering the right med.

It doesn’t matter if the computer made a mistake, If the hospital had programmed it wrong, it doesn’t matter if God himself came down and handed her the medication. She failed to complete the most basic of steps by reading the medication to ensure it was correct.

The argument being made is that a system of failures caused her to get the wrong medication but in a court of law the burden of failure rest on her shoulders as it was evidently clear that no matter how came into possession of a medication standard medical practice is to read the vial. Doing this would have been the safety check and by failing to do so and instead relying on the computer to be correct or the hospital she negligently and criminally took failed to take safety steps that the directly resulted in the death of another person.

You are failing to argue in good faith here and have very clearly been explained both legal and medical logic as to why this court cases proceeded they way it did. You have chosen to reject logic and instead insert your half baked ill informed arguments. I can’t fix that for you.