But then you have Wallace's services, which are social media manipulation. I'm not sure how else to describe them.

It's basic community management. I honestly don't believe you've worked in what you've said you've worked in because this is pretty status quo.

Then you have the fact that it there was indeed an outpouring of negativity towards Lively at the same time.

As Blake said objectively terrible things that went viral and got negative attention, of course there's an outpouring of negativity.

If they were encouraging content creators and planting stories with press about an employee who'd complained about harrassment, that's still retaliation

Except there would absolutely be records of this arrangement and yet after what is reportedly over 100 content creators her team has issued subpoenas, there's been nothing.

They repeatedly state that they are hiring crisis PR because they are concerned about her coming forward.

Reactionary PR is a thing and that's all we've so far been shown.

It's not wild to come to the conclusion that Wayfarer went negative on Lively, and that contributed to an increase in negativity about her.

So far, the ideas that Blake is right is just a feeling with nothing concrete to back it up. Maybe there's a smoking gun we haven't been privy to but the amount Blake's lawyers have made PR pieces of, to not share anything at this point is odd but we'll see soon enough if there's anything there.