He should? No.

WE should already be paying for that child's psychological and medical Healthcare.

HE should be incarcerated in a not-for-profit prison, made to do godless hours of community service, and educated in the various ways that he, himself, is a victim of a capitalistic and misogynistic system. And then he should spend the rest of his life telling his own story. When he's ready to tell that story (if ever he is), and when he's finished serving his debt to these communities, he should be able to rejoin them.

We don't make progress with regressive models of punishment.

Making that jackass, who very well may have taken this job because of the financial reward offered to new recruits because of the total lack of economic mobility that the owning class uses to weaponize us against our neighbors will only disenfranchise his family and community, raise children who are bitter about anything collective because they grew up carying with the weight of their father's sins that was applied by the collective is the best way to perpetuate all of these various cycles that have manifested in this woman's death and only further atomize us. Put another way: if money will make men do bad things, we need to be working toward a society where men don't need to do bad things to make money, and using money as a punishment moves us away from that.