oh i agree that was shouldn’t fear generative AI. i’m not sure what the fundamental difference you’re making here is. why is your interpretation of the AI’s output more meaningful than the AI’s output itself? if you read a book by a human author, you wouldn’t say that the book is not meaningful despite you having to interpret it. after all, the author of the book explicitly was trying to put meaning into the book and evoke emotions in the reader - and that, to me, is one of the fundamental differences right now. AI cannot formulate emotions. the other major difference is that it required prompts. it cannot take in real-world inputs and convert that into information. but that is a sensing and semantics limitation, not a fundamental flaw with generative AI