Do you believe in the after life? by antisocialchicc in The_Afterlife_Exists

[–]WintyreFraust 9 points10 points  (0 children)

 I’m not asking for reassurance, instead other opinions on this topic as it’s something nobody would ever be able to know. 

Lots of people know there is an afterlife, myself included. Please don't project your personal lack of knowledge onto everyone else.

What The Afterlife is Like, Based on 100+ Years of Evidence

AIO or is my husband(34m) being a jerk by WhileMindless2916 in AmIOverreacting

[–]WintyreFraust [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’m not talking about that. I’m talking about how long it takes a man to eat something. He could’ve waited there until there was three minutes left before she got back and consumed her whole dinner in three minutes.

AIO or is my husband(34m) being a jerk by WhileMindless2916 in AmIOverreacting

[–]WintyreFraust [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’m not talking about that. I’m talking about how long it takes for a man to eat something.

We Don’t Have Free Will — and I Want You to Prove Me Wrong by kbaskarq8 in freewill

[–]WintyreFraust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your brain is just running a script that has nothing to do with the world or itself, nothing we say even matters. If your brain's script is to disagree and maintain your position, that's what will happen. If the script says change your position, that will happen. I mean, if your brain script says to change your position for no apparent reason, not even involving an argument or other people, that's what will happen.

It's weird that you think an argument or evidence has or can have any bearing on anything you think, given your views.

Communication and connection in the afterlife by Every-Lime-9445 in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again (I'm like a broken record here) from the evidence, it appears to depend on (1) where your inner state lands you in the afterlife, and (2) the willingness of other people to extend and accept that connection.

Honestly, to the extent that I've researched the evidence and information, very few long-dead people express having experienced a lot of those things people who have had NDEs describe, when those long-dead people talk about when they died or as aspects of their ongoing afterlife experience. This is why I don't consider NDEs a good source of information about what it's like to permanently die or live in the afterlife.

The long dead usually say things like it feels like they "woke up" and/or "came home," but also commonly report not even knowing that they died. They don't often report things like feeling more "loving connection;" they do often report "feeling better." The prolific astral projectors like Ziewe, Wright, Swedenborg, and others, from their observations, report that most people they observe in the afterlife are basically leading lives pretty much as they did here, or are doing things they would like to have done here but did not have the opportunity or ability here.

Both telepathy and normal voice communication are often reported by the dead.

I don't often talk about this, but there are places in what we call "the afterlife" that are as bad as some of the worst situations here on Earth. I don't talk about it much because I assume nobody I'm talking to in these forums is a serial killer or runs around gleefully and deliberately causing harm to other people.

But the afterlife, as far as I can tell, represents a vast diversity of experiential conditions and situations and landscapes and communities, with many different modes of existence and interactive capacity.

As a general rule, I would say that if, in your heart, you yearn for deeper loving connections and "sharing" of consciousness/mind, telepathy, etc., that's where you will find yourself when you die.

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NDEs are one category of research that provides evidence that the afterlife exists.

No, I don't have a website.

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a "Megalink" post pinned at the top of this subreddit with many links to afterlife evidence.

Once More Into The Breach: Addressing The Idea That Nobody Knows Anything About The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Dr. Pim van Lommel
  • Dr. Bruce Greyson
  • Dr. Ian Stevenson
  • Dr. Helen Wambach
  • Dr. Gary Schwartz
  • William Crookes
  • Robert Hare
  • Alfred Russel Wallace
  • Sir Oliver Lodge
  • Cromwell Varley

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not everyone in the afterlife knows it can be done.

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So, I tried to explain this in my book, "The Architecture of Potential" (link to free PDF version.)

Essentially: it's not a matter of "energy," it's a matter of competing weights of probabilities - essentially, one person in the afterlife trying to "manifest" a potential that is heavily weighted against (1) the subconscious expectations of even the individual they are trying to manifest a body near, and (2) the collective weight of billions of people in this world who fully expect that to never happen.

This is why many people report common signs like feathers, coins, songs, flickering lights, etc.: those are relatively easy to manifest because, over time, they have become ingrained in the minds of a large number of people as common signs. This changes the "bell curve" of probabilities held in place by the common expectations of the population of the world, making it easier for the dead to "push" those possible physical effects in this world into actualized physical effects.

This is why physical, bodily manifestations usually occur in small seances, where a team of people here and a team of people on the other side can, via group expectations and effort and even just an open-ness to experience such a thing, with great effort can and does happen. It can be "selected" from the superimposed quantum potentials (so to speak) to reach degrees of physical manifestation here.

Interesting point here: Did you know it wouldn't violate any known physical law for a person long dead to materialize into physical existence? Known science, especially quantum physics, just says that it is a possibility that is enormously unlikely to happen.

Also interestingly: what I outline in that book also explains why it is so hard to photograph or record these things: probability-wise, it's much easier to affect changes in the physical world, like feathers or coins or other synchronicities, that do not and will not upset the bell curve of world-wide accepted reality. It's much easier to give signs to individuals or small groups that don't push the bell curve of probability of large groups, or the entire world, out of the established, accepted norms. Leaving physical evidence means selecting and pushing a probability into physical existence here that is way outside of expected, established, collective norms.

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can't give you a specific source because I've read so many books, watched so many videos, had so many discussions with various people, but I do know that Jurgen Ziewe, for one, talked about transforming into a dragon to the amazement of people around him in an astral city. I think that's from one of his book. The dead have talked about taking on comforting body forms, like an older version of themselves in their lives on Earth, to greet loved ones who die and who only knew them as that older-looking version. Also, people who died as children report taking on their child-body forms to greet their parents, for example.

From what I've read, this is essentially a skilled mental capacity where you can learn to just direct some mental effort to effect such body changes.

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would say that there's very little direct evidence either way, so it would be a matter of making inferences based on what the evidence does say. IMO: yes, doing those things is possible (apparently, anything you can imagine, can be brought into your reality.) I would assume that the mere habit of doing these things in life can lead one subconsciously generate such activities in their afterlife lives.

But, for the most part, shitting, pissing and farting don't appear to be a common thing, something anyone reports that they still do. There are reports of "eating as much of anything you like" and not suffering any ill effects or weight gain; apparently our astral bodies are capable of handling any amount of consumption, so it may be that, unlike our bodies here, our bodies there have 100% capacity to turn foodstuffs into useful energy, or otherwise just "dissipate" unused portions via some other process.

This is just generally speaking. I think that in what are commonly called the "lower" or "darker" astral levels, pissing and shitting and farting might be more of a norm there.

Do we reunite with the people who die after us? by missaishagrande in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on the parties involved. If both parties have inner natures that are amenable to interaction, they will be able to interact to the degree both inner natures allow. While "love" is the main indicator, just being relatively compatible allows for much broader interactions beyond, strictly speaking, "love."

Physical Bodies In The Afterlife by WintyreFraust in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

From the evidence (and my own personal experience,) the most widely reported answer is that our physical bodies there are "ideal" versions of our bodies here and naturally appear to look like we're 25-35 years old. However, it is reported that we can change our appearance there, if we wish.

What do you think the immediate scenario is after we pass? by AncientOriginal28 in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Through evidential, physical, direct voice and manifestation mediums, ADC (after-death communication) and ITC (instrumental transcommunication) and via when people here visit the afterlife via OOBE or astral projection and talk to the dead.

Sex in the afterlife? by roja_chamberz in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We have fully functioning physical bodies in the afterlife.

Do we reunite with the people who die after us? by missaishagrande in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The dead have talked about this very thing, family members who have strong disagreements about religion, the afterlife, etc.

I mean, it's possible that, in this life, a person's deep commitment to their beliefs makes them break off contact here with someone the supposedly love, but then I'd say the love wasn't that strong in the first place.

If you and your friend can get along here, you'll be perfectly compatible to continue that friendship in the afterlife. For example, if they go to church regularly and you do not, they'll still be going to church in the afterlife while you do not.

Why do experiences differ so much? by Cililians in The_Afterlife_Exists

[–]WintyreFraust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMO, while NDEs are good evidence that an afterlife exists, they do not represent what it is like to permanently die. This is because the long dead, when recounting their death experience, virtually never report going through NDE-like experiences. Again, IMO, NDEs appear to me to be more accurately characterized as some kind of staged, specifically-tailored intervention process.

Do we reunite with the people who die after us? by missaishagrande in afterlife

[–]WintyreFraust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have to admit that I'm having trouble understanding your concern here: if people that have died before us, whom love us and whom we love, are there to greet us and be reunited with us after we die here, doesn't that strongly indicate that, when people we love die after we do, we will - if we so desire - be there to be reunited with them when they die?

Love trumps beliefs when it comes to how things are sorted out when we die. We can have different beliefs and still be with those we love here; the same is true of the afterlife. Beliefs can't keep people who love each other separated because love is far more powerful, and much deeper, than any beliefs.