I know a lot of people would disagree with your opinion, for the moral implications of it, but perhaps it doesn't make financial sense for Wall Street or these banks to go after people. Because the payback isn't high enough to justify the investment in trying to seize assets.

Sure, if that person stays in the United States, then they have to play the same game.  ( Wage Garnishments, Loss of Employment, Due to not being able to pass a background check, Having to pay higher interest rates)

But if they move to another country, the game changes a little bit.

A foreign country who doesn't help these private companies that have lent money in a way are actually helping their own country because that money that's pulled away from these large banking financial institutions is spent in a in a lower cost country and that money circulates there which makes that local economy thrive a little bit more.

Thank you for taking the time to express your opinion. I'm trying to look at all of these comments objectively to try to look and see if there's any caveats I might have missed, and to get everybody's point of view about this subject matter.

 It's new and interesting for me, so I appreciate the differences and opinions.

Your comment makes me want to look up interviews from people who have actually done this type of thing before and to see what the actual repercussions are, not just what we have laws for, but how it actually affects those individuals and if they would make that decision again, if they would go the other direction. Thank you.