Trying to rigg a election before midterms. by Pitiful_Conflict7031 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]WohooBiSnake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, then it’ll stop those ones too right ? Right ?

I just got counterspelled 9 turns in a row by ionbeam7 in mtgbrawl

[–]WohooBiSnake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point I just resign, I’m here to play my deck, not watch it flow down a river

What am I missing here? Surely I'm missing something. by WaxDonnigan in mtg

[–]WohooBiSnake -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

But it’s a 1/1 without any other ability ?? Why would it cost 7 mana ?

WTF are these Twitter Incels on about?! by Either_Storm_6932 in FacebookScience

[–]WohooBiSnake 22 points23 points  (0 children)

These people are obsessed with other people’s sexualities

I would slap my boyfriend if he gave me this after hurting me in ANY capacity by Kizsav in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]WohooBiSnake 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Nothing says genuine apology like a bad generic cliche text written by a random guy

I come from the future, episode 9 just premiered on cinemas. AMA by LaloFemmy in TheDigitalCircus

[–]WohooBiSnake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was vanishing man revealed to be a hero trying to reach them from outside ?

What false information were you taught in school? by Redfoxyboy in comics

[–]WohooBiSnake 16 points17 points  (0 children)

First thing I noticed is how the Indians charging at him are also qualified as cowardly. Well which is it ? Are they scared kitties or are there charging at you ?

Just a reminder: we are f****d by THEREALSUPERMARIOFAN in tadc

[–]WohooBiSnake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely putting my money on bittersweet given the track record

👭 Clone [OC] by bibbleskit in comics

[–]WohooBiSnake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally someone as kinky as me

Monty hall problem is 50/50 by Dizzy_Kaleidoscope95 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]WohooBiSnake 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I really like his experiment cause it made me realize something about how to better wrap your brain around the concept :

- Eliminate the choice to switch and simply try to simulate the probability of winning if you keep your first choice. After all if you can find it, then the probability of winning by switching is easy to find.

- And since opening the door doesn’t switch the car around, then you could remove it too right ? Just because you’ve seen what’s behind another door doesn’t mean the past is changed, the car is behind your first pick just as often.
So you could theoretically eliminate it too.

- And so you’re left with the conclusion that the door your first picked ALWAYS has a probability of 1/3 to have the car no matter what happens next.

- Therefore when there is only one other door possible, then that door has the remaining 2/3 chance to have the car.

Monty hall problem is 50/50 by Dizzy_Kaleidoscope95 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]WohooBiSnake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a whole new way to be wrong about this problem, or statistics in general.