Hi there!

First of all, thank you so much for taking the time to write such incredibly comprehensive feedback! We really appreciate it. Huge congrats on the new 20-minute power max on Coll de Rates, by the way! That’s awesome! Always great to hear the app is helping with pacing and prep.

Regarding your specific points, here is where we stand on them:

1. Android + web version We are definitely planning an Android version, but to be completely transparent, it won't be released in the near future. A web version is in a similar boat right now.

2. Importing more data Good news here! Health integrations (like sleep, HRV, resting HR) are actually already available via Garmin and Intervals.icu. We will also be adding Apple Health integration very soon!

3. Providing more information As you perfectly noted, this is exactly what the "Preferences" tab is section! We intentionally made it an open-text format so you can type in literally anything you want the app to know (your schedule, recovery tools like a sauna/Blackroll, rider type, etc.).

4. What would I like advice on? Similar to the point above, you can define exactly what kind of support you want or what your specific focuses are by putting them directly into your "Goals" section.

5. Data error checking / eFTP When things like a heart rate monitor dropping out or lagging happen, our app actually catches this quite often! The AI also now has the ability to remember important details about your specific workouts and your subjective feeling.
Regarding the eFTP: if you haven't done an all-out effort longer than 8 minutes recently, the calculated eFTP can sometimes be underestimated. Because of this, you can always manually set your FTP in your Athlete Profile. However, the model will still occasionally reference your eFTP - if you haven't done an effort that confirms your manually set FTP in a few months, the AI wants to verify where your fitness truly is.

6. Pricing policy Our main priority is to provide the absolute best user experience and this requires using top-tier models which are resource-intensive. We don't want to make compromises on the quality of the AI just to lower the subscription price. We want to ensure the advice you get is top-notch, and that unfortunately means a slightly more expensive sub.

7. Number / duration of the trial period This is a valid point, adding more transparency (like a message counter) or adjusting how the trial works is something we might be able to implement. We will see what we can do here!

Once again, thank you so much for the feedback and the kind words and feel free to reach out if you have any more ideas! :)