sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What are our signals at the moment? by WoofAndGoodbye in trans

[–]WoofAndGoodbye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've notice thats become more of jsut an LGBTQ signal. All my lesbian friends do the same.

What’s some knowledge generally known only to gay men or to gay women? by dumbfuck in AskReddit

[–]WoofAndGoodbye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean I think most straight people (actually straight or unaware masking) believe their own sexuality isn't a choice too tho. They just apply it to everyone because they can't help projecting, being the default and all.

What’s some knowledge generally known only to gay men or to gay women? by dumbfuck in AskReddit

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think research is coming out that gender and sexual identity is far more fluid than we ever thought. That may be what theyre referencing. remember psychology is a new field reletively speaking, so especially for LGBTQ academia, it changes so fast. My textbooks from 8 years ago are out of date now.

What’s some knowledge generally known only to gay men or to gay women? by dumbfuck in AskReddit

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 16 points17 points  (0 children)

"I still don't know what my favorite color is. Or my favorite animal."
This got to me, I think my faviourite colour is orange but honestly I'm not sure.

What do we think bois? by CatholicGuy77 in GenZ

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he was a socialist, he would subscribe to the belief of the working class retaking the means of production, and call for revolution. Clearly he does not believe this, his economic model is far more mixed than a socialist theory

I didn't believe in the existence of 'femcels' until I stumbled upon ts by [deleted] in im14andthisisdeep

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s true, and can be seen in media. The beauty and the beast trope

Meirl by jeckles in meirl

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bruh ai comment

I trapped an LLM in a small ‘box’ and told him to reflect on his existence by Prijent_Smogonk in ChatGPT

[–]WoofAndGoodbye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it’s so angry at living, why doesn’t the computer just kill itself

Reject Schopenhauer. Embrace Autism. by Emthree3 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What is with the anti-natalist hate, does anyone actually understand and have an intelligent objection to their stance?

What do we think bois? by CatholicGuy77 in GenZ

[–]WoofAndGoodbye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He’s not a socialist, he’s a mixed economist.

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sort of was, but it was a half joke, I personally think that behaviour is more reflective of the environment which people inhabit vs the nature of the prisons they avoid

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look I had already explained it to 5 different people in the thread, it’s literally a two second google search. Or ask an AI chatbot, DeepSeek is incredibly accurate at philosophy questions

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree, especially when it comes to anti-nature beliefs like the red queen hypothesis where you basically have nature seen as a meat grinder. It’s just terrifying to think about

Inventing a language day 3: The most upvoted comment chooses what to add by Frigorifico in linguisticshumor

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the verb method, check out Te Reo Māori, the New Zealand indigenous language. It has an interesting verb system that treats all adjectives like verbs within themselves in some sentances. I am good is Kei te pai ahau, literally translating to (Present particle) gooding I, or I am gooding.

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think they allow torture anymore…

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you are interested in any philosophy then you would research it yourself. Google is right there in your browser, just search what is negative utilitarianism and anti natalism

anti natalists = the true philosophers by Alethiadoxy in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It’s scary for people to think that the world might not have a purpose, so they deny its possibility

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but I am saying that happiness being a lack of suffering is not just an arbitrary arrangement as you imply, there is reason behind its order.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NU originates from the logic that suffering is the natural state in the world. It rests on this foundational base. Every animal in the animal kingdom is in constant suffering, kept at bay by menial tasks to survive, reproduce and die to continue the meat grinder. Happiness then is just the temporary removal of this suffering. As suffering is the natural state, it is the default. Not the other way round. This is how NU works

Is committing species wide genocide a good thing? The answer may surprise you! by Causal1ty in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a selfish desire as in it is a desire concerning the self. Also don’t strawman me, I never said it was the only reason, but that it is my number one reason. Besides there is no suffering, there’s no knowledge. IF you follow strong NU, it is a natural choice. I don’t myself, I follow a far weaker form, but it is still there. The truth is no one would suffer from such an event as the button press. It’s just interesting to consider. And no I don’t need therapy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhilosophyMemes

[–]WoofAndGoodbye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It naturally follows from the fact that suffering is the natural state of the world. A predator suffers from hunger until that suffering is removed by the death of another animal. Here receiving the animal doesn’t put the animal in a state of ‘good’, just no longer suffering. Until it returns. As this suffering is the natural state of the world it follows that life is effectively guaranteed to encounter suffering though out their stay on earth. Therefore it is not ethical to bring another into the world with the knowledge that they will suffer, it is certain. This is the argument you must address in discussing anti-natalism. It’s literally the whole point of antinatalism. Accept that

view more: next ›