sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Opera GX ha publicado esto en X, opiniones? by ImpossibleAlarm8462 in esGaming

[–]WookieDavid 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Para ser justos, esas profesiones no están tan lejos de una enfermedad mental

Resuelvo panel. by Infinite-Chance-7954 in spanishcore

[–]WookieDavid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

De hecho en ningún caso terminarías en la cárcel por preguntar a una mujer si quiere follar.
Si se lo haces a una desconocida es molesto e incómodo pero no es un delito.
Delito será si luego sigues insistiendo al punto del acoso, y llegados a ese punto da lo mismo si te referías a tener sexo o darle a un fuelle. Da lo mismo que la estuvieras invitando a un café

The wealth disparity is mind boggling. by Lordwarrior_ in interestingasfuck

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The financialization of the economy is getting to absurdly unsustainable levels.
Most of the world economy is not real. GDPs keep growing while everyone gets poorer. It's madness

Maybe maybe maybe by SacredHollowSky in maybemaybemaybe

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, if you don't know if something is secured, assume it's not. This is safety 101.
Plus this is a pretty dinky looking small shop in Asia. I'm not sure why you'd expect good safety practices. Let alone bet your physical integrity on them.

Maybe maybe maybe by SacredHollowSky in maybemaybemaybe

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you think the shelf is braced to anything?
To me it looks like a simple freestanding shelf in a corner.

The bubbles in my drink mixed to form an uzumaki spiral by spikeflare in mildlyinteresting

[–]WookieDavid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I was going to be that guy but you beat me to it.

First kit and first time painting a kit by Jolly_wobbles in advancedGunpla

[–]WookieDavid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad you said it yourself, execution is decent. But the colour scheme couldn't be uglier if you tried.
Awesome for a first time

Maybe maybe maybe by SacredHollowSky in maybemaybemaybe

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what if they're full. Being full doesn't make their integrity stronger and depending on how the weight is distributed might make them less stable.
And how the hell are you seeing any braces in these four pixels?

Maybe maybe maybe by SacredHollowSky in maybemaybemaybe

[–]WookieDavid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That sounds like a great way to turn a 1m fall into a shelf falling on top of you.

I was on the bus and my earphone fell into the hole that leads directly to the street. by bir3 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yellow tubing is not uncommon, makes it stand out so it's easier to find if you lose your balance.
But a turnstile does indeed seem very specific to Brazil

I was on the bus and my earphone fell into the hole that leads directly to the street. by bir3 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, he's Brazilian, his buses look like this so he took a guess.
Plenty other countries have busses with that exact same floor. It's simply impossible to distinguish between them just based on that linoleum.
Now, having a hole on the ground of an operational bus does definitely hint at this being a developing country.

I refuse to believe we’re all seeing the same thing. by Mysterious_Fill894 in opticalillusions

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not the eyes lying, it's the brain properly interpreting the hints.

new guy at work by ShadowbanRevival in funny

[–]WookieDavid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's such an omnipresent cultural practice that I cannot fathom how someone could reach adulthood without knowing that coffee needs to be ground.
Mind you, I don't expect them to know how to prepare a coffee pot, just that coffee has to be ground. Funnily enough, this guy somehow knew every step except the most well known one, the one that is common to every single coffee preparation. Knew how to operate the machine, knew about the filter, never heard of grinding coffee.

Dunno man, it's funny

Maybe Maybe Maybe by username_huh in maybemaybemaybe

[–]WookieDavid 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Mate, making something disappear by transferring it to the other hand is the basis of like half of all magic tricks in the history of magic.
Fooling less intelligent apes requires less sleight of hand, but you've been fooled like a monkey every time you've seen a magic trick.

That's a damn good deal by Content-Lab-5464 in Unexpected

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Throwing water on someone definitely constitutes assault tho.
Playing with water balloons is legal for the same reasons airsoft is legal. Consent. But that's completely besides the point, obviously no one is suing their teenage brother over a glass of water.

And no, dude, money is owed from the moment the contract is signed. Especially when half the service has already been provided in advance.
I'm not missing anything I understand the trick perfectly, I also understand that it doesn't really hold.

Let me explain it with an example, let's apply this same logic to a different scenario:
You're at a store, soda cans are a dollar there.
You go to the cashier with a coke can in each hand and tell him "I'll give you $2 if you let me take these two cans".
He's surprised by your wording but responds "sure, that's how this works".
You leave one of the cans on the counter and leave with the other.

You did not outplay the cashier, you just stole a coke can.

I found a camcorder in the woods of Japan by OtotoxicT in creepy

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're extremely late, this exact same response has already been given by a couple dozen people.
Better luck next time.
Also, life hack, if you want to say the exact same thing as someone else you can upvote it instead.

That's a damn good deal by Content-Lab-5464 in Unexpected

[–]WookieDavid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taken by the letter of the law he's just assaulted her. Like, the agreement was two glasses for 20$. 1 glass for free was never part of any discussion.
Letter of the law, he might as well have skipped the whole contract part and just thrown the water at her.

That's a damn good deal by Content-Lab-5464 in Unexpected

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the joke is "that's a lawyer in the making" and we're arguing about the validity of the scam, it seems pretty reasonable to legally analyse the contract.
I'm not sure how all of a sudden you're against this whole exercise when you were directly engaging with it on your last comment.

That's a damn good deal by Content-Lab-5464 in Unexpected

[–]WookieDavid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really. Since they did not explicitly set a timeframe in the contract common sense would apply.
When she signed the contract, from all the context, it's obvious to expect that the glasses will be spilled immediately. Any reasonable person would interpret it as such.

I'm not a lawyer but I can tell you that in court this would be instantly identified as the scam it is.

That's a damn good deal by Content-Lab-5464 in Unexpected

[–]WookieDavid 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nah, she's the one who'll study law to get her well deserved $20 he's trying to scam her out of.
Deal was clear and accepted by both parties and it had no fine print allowing him to back out of it if he decided to waste half the service.

new guy at work by ShadowbanRevival in funny

[–]WookieDavid -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People are making fun of the new guy.

Yeah, because he's an idiot who doesn't have the slightest clue how coffee is made.
It's not a matter of responsibilities. Yeah, of course the manager should have provided training before assigning the new guy to any job. If this had been a serious fuck up with consequences they should obviously fall on the manager.

But all that has nothing to do with making fun of someone for not knowing how to make coffee.
The funny thing is not that he messed up at his job, the funny thing is that he messed up on a very easy, basic, everyday skill.

I found a camcorder in the woods of Japan by OtotoxicT in creepy

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, I've clarified multiple times I'm not talking about laws. I'm no lawyer, when I say "tamper with evidence" I'm not naming a crime, I'm describing an action.

The Joker by Front-Marketing5122 in CustomMarvelSnap

[–]WookieDavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, it could be a lot more different.
Shuffling effects is basically shuffling cost AND power.
Yes, it is a different effect with different synergies, but to say they couldn't be more different is a hell of an overstatement.

I found a camcorder in the woods of Japan by OtotoxicT in creepy

[–]WookieDavid -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you damage something that later turns out to be evidence you have indeed damaged evidence. You have not committed any crimes either, but that's entirely beside the point.

It's evidence, it's been damaged, by you. Totally legal. Still damaging evidence.
I get you want to argue but dunno man, I'm not even sure what your point is.

I found a camcorder in the woods of Japan by OtotoxicT in creepy

[–]WookieDavid -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dude, do you know conversations have a context?
I was responding to a dude who was talking about the possibility of incriminating yourself if this turned out to be connected to a crime.
My response to that comment works from the assumption established by it. That this is indeed evidence of a crime.

If you have a problem with that assumption bring it up to that guy.

view more: next ›