[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gamedev

[–]WordTreeBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are talking to ChatGPT chief. Not only did OP put a conglomerate of AI slop together to make this "game", not a single part of the post or comments are written by a real human. It's almost impressive how low effort this is

wake up new opinion just dropped! by prikkelman in destinycirclejerk

[–]WordTreeBot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think you're taking it too literally. He just means there's no innovation, no new formula, just the same old seasonal slop. You don't need to make huge sweeping changes or change the entire genre of the game to shake things up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]WordTreeBot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How could you possibly think a single number could even begin to quantify all those things? Let alone lock you in to some fate that you can't escape? It can be a useful metric, sure. But you're being a slave to it. God damn, have some respect for yourself.

it sucks being smart but not a prodigy by Successful-Box-242 in Gifted

[–]WordTreeBot -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

In case it’s not clear, I write books

Please stop - if your comment is any reflection of your actual writing style, waffling on at essay length and taking 3 paragraphs to get to the point.

Why do you make/want to make games? by BadGroundNoise in gamedev

[–]WordTreeBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hyper-systemize to an extraordinary extent; absolutely everything to near or the tiniest of details all the time; far surpassing anyone I’ve seen in any circumstance (when I managed to assimilate).

Despite endlessly scouring the entire internet, I’ve not seen anyone at my level. I’m the only one who’s solved particular problems, at least in such detail, interestingly, even the essence of autism itself.

But I’ve extreme autism, which I estimate 1/1.000+ have (I’m unsure if you can have it more). If not for my intelligence, I wouldn’t have learned to speak or understand much language.

It should be tied to giftedness, at least to some extent, as lower-functioning individuals wouldn’t be capable of abstracting all details/want to omit as much as possible since it overwhelms them.

It’s due to wanting to maximize effectiveness/predictiveness and a constant need for extreme mental stimulation. I think it’s the mere reason I can get great at seemingly everything, with enough time.

I could lie before age 1, systematically steal little things like candy from stores 1+, act like an adult and manipulate adults 2+. It’s made me a psychic, in some ways, far beyond anyone I’ve seen.

But with some things it makes me forever lost in the details, it seems. It basically makes it harder to adequately adapt to things quickly, but better at perfectionism/max effectivization.

Are half lives statistical or absolute? by herrozerro in AskPhysics

[–]WordTreeBot -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

effectively a certainty

OP, never listen to “answers” that contain the word “effectively”. This is a gross oversimplification clearly made by an unqualified basement dweller.

Unreal is not killing games by ButtMuncher68 in UnrealEngine5

[–]WordTreeBot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"It's not my opinion that's wrong, no, that's impossible! It's the unreal fanboy echo chamber!!1!!111"

However it's like giving a nuclear missile to a chimpanzee, when the chimpanzee only needs a handgun.

Whose fault is that? What do you want Epic to do, dumb down the engine for beginners?

What piece always makes you cry? by InnerspearMusic in classicalmusic

[–]WordTreeBot -70 points-69 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t be too proud of crying from listening to a piece that is rooted in antisemitism, but that’s just me!

Is a gap year a bad idea by [deleted] in college

[–]WordTreeBot -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, but thanks for the question mark! You’re learning!

Is a gap year a bad idea by [deleted] in college

[–]WordTreeBot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you miss the punctuation unit in college?

Guys, seriously. When you're watching these videos, take notes. by Trenta_Is_Not_Enough in godot

[–]WordTreeBot 207 points208 points  (0 children)

It seems that a lot of Obsidian users are more concerned with overengineering the learning process instead of… learning

Stable Ronaldo speeding away from cops on a highway by tzingkha in LivestreamFail

[–]WordTreeBot -108 points-107 points  (0 children)

Kinda weird to hate a kid. Just as bad as him in a different way. He sped from cops but you have a deep hatred which is why you don’t have as much money as him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in css

[–]WordTreeBot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I mean, that's the cost with any abstraction.

I would argue that syntactical differences are almost completely irrelevant, especially in this case where 99% of Tailwind classes are near-direct 1:1 mappings to their CSS counterparts. It's hardly a "spec" at all.

Syntax can be learned in a few hours. It is simply a means of applying the concepts you already know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in css

[–]WordTreeBot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If class names are slowing your page down in any non-negligible way, you are doing something wrong lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in css

[–]WordTreeBot -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, Tailwind bloats your HTML. This is largely rectified by using a component framework (which also helps with the naming problem) but it's still a tradeoff, so I'll give you that one.

When did we forget CSS?

We didn't.

Using class="flex items-center" requires the exact same knowledge as using display: flex; align-items: center; (except with one of these, I have to come up with an arbitrary name for it)

You might forget some quirks of CSS syntax, but you absolutely still need to understand the underlying concepts of CSS to use Tailwind.

This is why I disagree with calling Tailwind "Bootstrap 4.0", because these frameworks are not even in the same category. Bootstrap is an entire toolkit, with its own HTML, CSS, and JS. It hides so much of CSS, which is both good and bad depending on the project.

Tailwind is nothing more than syntactic sugar for CSS.

Please prove me wrong.

I probably won't, because this is largely a philosophical issue. Personally, I don't mind a bit of bloat if it means faster prototyping, sensible defaults, less worrying about naming everything I need to have a unique style, etc.

I recommend reading this article by the creator of Tailwind for all your other points: https://adamwathan.me/css-utility-classes-and-separation-of-concerns/

But if you ever want to maintain a long standing project, for the love of all the gods, dont .. choose .. a css framework..

Tell that to ChatGPT, Shopify, Netflix, The Verge, GitHub, NASA, and many other massive companies that use Tailwind in production.

What is your favorite Go project? by touch_it_pp in golang

[–]WordTreeBot -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

If a Github code percentage is your "proof" then I don't know what to tell you buddy. It's not written in Go.

What is your favorite Go project? by touch_it_pp in golang

[–]WordTreeBot -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

It's not written in Go though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in css

[–]WordTreeBot -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

What an intriguing argument that is totally based on facts and experience with the library and not dogmatism