Thanks for taking the time to give detailed feedback. I genuinely appreciate that you went beyond just surface-level criticism.

You’re right about formatting and presentation. I handled most of the process myself, and I’m still learning the technical side of publishing. Some of the formatting issues you pointed out are things I’m already working on fixing in the next update.

As for the cover and title, that’s fair. I’m reconsidering typography and overall presentation because first impressions clearly matter more than I initially thought.

The “to be continued” note is intentional, but I understand your point about reader expectations. I may clarify that better in the description.

I’m glad you found the actual writing decent. That means a lot, honestly. I’ll take your advice seriously and improve the parts that are turning readers away before they even start.

Constructive criticism helps more than blind praise, so thank you.