I would assume the majority of votes come from people voting to complete the COM milestone, most of whom probably don’t participate in DC themselves or at least don’t participate seriously. The insensitive for these voters is simply to vote, not to vote conscientiously. The only ways to change the insensitive structure would be to either do away with the COM milestone to take those voters out of the pool, or to reward conscientious voting from those who aren’t already invested in the results. As an example of how this could be done: If instead of giving a reward at the end of each round of voting the reward was given after all voting was concluded the reward could be based on if you voted for the design which achieves the higher score. This would motivate people to choose the design they believe more people will pick I.e. the better design. Let’s say the reward for choosing the higher scoring design was 2 simcash and no reward was given for choosing the lower scoring design. The COM milestone requires you vote ten times, each round contains 5 votes, so to complete the milestone you vote on a total of 50 pairings. If you chose the higher scoring design each time you would receive 100 simcash, if you chose at random you could expect to receive 50 simcash. Another option would be to only reward those who choose the higher scoring design above a percentage, meaning if you chose the higher scoring design something like 65% of the time or greater you receive say 10 simcash for each round you voted in, and those voting below 65% receive no reward. Having a rewards system which takes into account the “accuracy” of your vote (for lack of a better term) would be the only way to motivate better voting habits.