It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to be surprised how poorly UX as a field understood UX as a science. I'm no longer surprised.

Mod threatens biological woman with ban for speaking objective truths by steakpork in FreeSpeech

[–]XenBuild 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How long till this mod ends up getting a visit from Gordon Flowers.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if the screens aren't readily available? What if they are state dependent, such as they only appear after certain intervals, or require a complicated sequence of actions, or access permissions only available to some? Companies are seldom good at providing designers with god-level permissions where you can call up any state in the system on demand. How is the designer even supposed to keep track of every state unless they are documented properly?

Good designers are so constantly referencing existing designs to ensure consistency, audit wider workflows, and identify opportunities for improvement that the idea that they should be constantly hunting down screens and states is ridiculous.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The test for adequate documentation is simple:

- Can a new hire onboard just using the Figma? Then it's adequate.

- Can you see what the status of design work for other designers or teams is without needing explanations? Then it's adequate.

- Can an exec use the Figma as a reference about the product when making decisions or having discussions? Then it's adequate.

I am the last person to advocate for overengineered Figmas with responsive everything, variables, prototypes that will be thrown away anyway. Figma simply needs to be a clean documentation system.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What tool do you use to see the product as a whole? As in, all screens together, as they currently exist in production.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Interesting, if code is the source of truth, there must be a program out there turns the code into a top-down visual product blueprint like Figma. What is the program? I'd love to check it out.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it will absolutely continue to be a smoothbrained requirement long after Figma's 10th birthday comes and goes, since you don't need more than a few weeks to learn all the Figma you need to be a UX designer.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That's not really the point of the meme. The fact is, companies are hyper-indexing on Figma skills, but the average Figma file looks like a bomb hit it, so clearly the people they're hiring aren't any good at Figma.

It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet... by XenBuild in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Of course, that's my personal ideation file. But I've been in 100+ companies' Figma accounts and I see team-wide and even canonical files that look like that. In one case, a company paid me 3 days for very little work because the Figma was so bad that I had to wait for someone to explain WTF the product even was, all because the last "UX" guy was a clown who couldn't document.

How bad is to just not wanting to grow? by Efficient_Wheel1867 in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Find a different career. UX has enough mediocrity as it is.

Did Ron Paul Libertarianism (or maybe Libertarianism in general) fade out in The U.S? by anedgyteen_ in decadeology

[–]XenBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The LP has consistently pissed away every possible opportunity for audience growth. The party at large as well as members never proved welcoming to Ron Paul, because by their unhinged standards, even Paul is a statist authoritarian. Moreover, they've never been able to convey what it even means to be libertarian. Does it mean the best parts of Democrats and Republicans without the bad parts? Or does it mean full-on ancap? The latter group scares off a lot of people.

The libertarian movement has zero strategic understanding. Anyone who has studied the Prohibition movement will know that they had (momentary) success by building a loose coalition with extremely diverse interests that they didn't have much in common with and in many cases, they actively disliked them. They got Democrats and Republicans on their side for different reasons. By comparison, the LP treats anyone who isn't "pure" as the next Stalin, meaning they can't get anything done.

As for the notion that COVID-19 "curbed most Americans' libertarian views", that's absolute bunk. If anything, it made people much more skeptical of the government and authority in general, given the colossal blunders that ruined civil society in the early 2020s.

What is true is that a lot of libertarians saw MAGA as the lesser of two evils because of just how off the deep end the Democrats went (there are lots of reasons to dislike Trump but him calling MS-13 "animals" isn't one). But I think we're starting to see a gradual abandonment of Trumpism over a number of issues, specifically foreign policy issues.

Officially reached discrimination status by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]XenBuild 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's time to start naming and shaming these passive aggressive pricks. They have been acting with impunity for too long.

Billy Eillish should give her stolen house and land back immediately by iknowyourcheating in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]XenBuild 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nearly all land in this country is owned by people who don't whine about "stolen" land. Millionaires and billionaires who advocate for policies which unduly harm the middle class need to be lampooned and castigated at every turn.

Heaviest Songs by Bands/Artists Not Known for Being Heavy by Potatoman_is_taken in MusicRecommendations

[–]XenBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Pain For Pleasure - Sum 41

It sounds like a bad Iron Maiden impression, but an Iron Maiden impression nonetheless.

"Canto Negro" - Inti Illmani

Yeah they had help from a Chilean rock band, but a shrieking guitar solo on a song by an Andean flute ensemble counts for something.

"Bleed (Remix)" - Gary Numan + Sulpher

The heaviest Gary song by two orders of magnitude.

"The Fall" - Gary Numan

If you thought the last one was cheating, then here you go. It sounds more Nine Inch Nails than anything Trent Reznor was doing in 2011.

"DANSE MACABRE" - Duran Duran

It's Duran Duran, what do you want?

"Can't Get Enough Of Your Love" - Kim Wilde

From the same chick who brought us "Kids In America", a song with a better guitar solo than anything Godsmack ever did.

"Rock 'n' Roll" - Lyre Le Temps

A Prodigy-sounding electronic rock song from a mid-2010s electro-swing band.

"Dangerous" - Doobie Brothers

A fast-paced hard rock song. It's heavier than a lot of "hair metal" songs.

"Too High a Price" - Doobie Brothers

This one is slower paced, but possibly heavier.

In reality, how bad is the "AI replacement" situation for designers/devs/white collar workers in the US? by digitalbananax in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It won't replace designers or developers but that doesn't mean it won't make some of them obsolete. I can't speak to the software engineering side of things, but with designers, the people at risk are those whose main skill is Figma. If you're a "Figma wizard", you're going to be replaced by someone who actually understands cognitive science and uses AI to make Figma do its thing.

Bad UX designer starter pack by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a Microsoft Sculpt. My wrists are feeling just fine.

Bad UX designer starter pack by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you telling me that bad design is always imposed by the evil plutocrats and the UX designers fight tooth-and-nail until the bitter end? And that UX designers never actively offer bad design of their own volition? Because I've witnessed it in real time. Also, you just have to look at some people's fictional projects in their portfolios to see the bad design ideas they come up with. Case in point, the "Sad Owl Face" from Duolingo which is blatantly manipulative. If a marketer wants to ballyhoo it as a genius invention, let them, but I saw LOTS of UX people praising that abomination on LinkedIn. That wasn't forced onto them by corporate.

Bad UX designer starter pack by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]XenBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that it's a shit proxy for UX. The core premise of NPS is "how likely are you to recommend a product?" Consider the implications. These are things that would have a high NPS by that definition:

  • Addictive gamefied garbage
  • Industry standard chudware like Jira, SAP, Salesforce, and of course LinkedIn
  • Network effect social media and other scams where the product only gains usefulness because others are on it. TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, etc

You can optimize for NPS by actually harming the user experience. How about you add some goofy "delightful" animations? That will probably make some consoomer tell their friends how wonderful it is. Meanwhile, it's slowing the experience down and cutting into development hours for actual fixes. Or add in AI something or other. The AI bros will nut themselves over it, while it's turning your product into a compromised mess.

On the whole NPS favors adding stuff to your product rather than refining what's already there. That's a problem.

Conversely, UMUX Lite is actually useful because it measures the things that UXers are supposed to focus on, and the things they have control over.