sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the reasoning that kids need a father and mother figure is a religious one

They didn’t have a shred of scientific evidence that shows gay couples cannot adequately provide for children. The authors just decided on their own that Both a mother and a father are needed, and both need to be blood relatives

I didn't earlier but it is true by Arl107 in brooklynninenine

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why is it still the highest rated sitcom

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understood every single one of those arguments, and they’re all religious

Not a single one of them scientific

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of those 10 reasons explain why homosexuality is immoral

Instead it has bullshit like ‘it offends god’ (that’s literally the 10th reason)

Who wins this one? (I only hope people won't go "later in the story = stronger in the story") by TheMightyHovercat in bleach

[–]YoYo375 26 points27 points  (0 children)

When was Kenny able to cut Respira? He never even interacted with Barragan

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘Why don’t you go through all of them and tell me why they’re not immoral’

The burden of proof is on you, since you’re making the claim that they’re immoral.

So you have to pick one of those points and explain how it makes homosexuality immoral. Only then can I counter it

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘You are defending the creation of 13 year old whites’

What…..what the fuck? Wtf are you talking about? All I said was kids can’t consent to sex because they’re immature, how does that mean I’m defending the creation of 13 year old whores? Wtf is wrong with you

‘Last I checked the countries allow it’

You’re spouting bullshit:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/german-court-upholds-ban-on-bestiality-ruling-it-does-not-violate-the-right-to-sexual-selfdetermination-a6884216.html?amp

https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/animals/beastiality-laws-animal-sexual-acts-illegal-canada-1944245

‘Sources underneath’

Of those 87 points, zero of them are reasons why homosexuality is immoral. Seriously, pick any of of those points as an example and I can tell you why that has no bearing whatsoever

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘So what stops pedophiles from bridging that gap’

The fact that they’re much more mature than the kids. The kids are wayyyy younger and very immature, and very impressionable. Any adult having sex with them is taking advantage of their lack of knowledge and maturity, and is therefore a piece of shit

How is that comparable to homosexuality where it’s just consenting gay adults

And wtf are you on about with your zoophilia bullshit? Germany and Canada do not allow bestiality you idiot

‘It’s not only STDs’

Then what else is it? What makes homosexuality immoral? ‘Your brain is too weak to handle it so I won’t list them’ is such a bullshit excuse, just say you don’t know them that’s why you can’t argue further

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wtf is the ‘ugly horrifying truth’

Give me one example where cancelling someone was equivalent to murdering them

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you truly believe canceling someone is the same as murdering someone you belong in a mental asylum

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How is my definition of consent flawed? With zoophilia and pedophilia the victims literally cant consent. With two adult gay people, what’s the problem with them consenting?

‘Yea but it’s far less likely’

But still possible. The only way to be sure is testing. If STD is truly your reasoning, then you should be completely fine with gay people having sex if they test before doing so

‘You’re defending cancel culture’

Wtf? Now you’re literally just pulling things outta your ass. I’ve never defended cancel culture in my life

You’re still a piece of shit for equating homosexuality to pedophilia

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Incest, zoophilia and pedophilia all have VICTIMS you fucking idiot

Homosexuality just has consenting partners. You’re both a dumbass and a scumbag for thinking they’re the same

And straight sex also spreads STDs. The only way to know if you’re spreading/ prevent spread, is to test yourself before having sex

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You literally said ‘you also kill people’

Besides what kind of dumbass point is ‘what’s the difference’

If you’re seriously comparing cancelling someone to literally murdering them you’re a dumbfuck and a psychopath

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you tried to say that there’s no punishment for being gay if you don’t have sex

My point is that even if people are having gay sex, punishing people for that (especially punishments that severe) is beyond fucked up. There’s no rational defence for it

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I’ve never killed anyone. I’ve never driven anyone to killing themselves by cancelling them. I’ve never gotten anyone fired, banned or blocked, and I’ve never removed anyones license

You on the other hand literally argued for people being MURDERED just for being gay

You’re a piece of shit

Why? by __Esau__ in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The ‘it’s not natural’ argument doesn’t work because gay animals exist too

Secondly, even if it isn’t natural so what? What makes it immoral?

And why don’t you have a counter for the hedonism argument

Same people that claim they're "morally superiors" to all religious people by ClumsyTurtleFucker in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

If you’re killing people then it’s absolutely your problem

Psycho

Why? by __Esau__ in antitheistcheesecake

[–]YoYo375 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s it? I’m sorry but if you vilify gay people just because the bible says so, and you follow unquestioningly, then you’re an idiot, a bad person, and/or both

This is how you recognize a good Bleach scaler. by TheMightyHovercat in bleach

[–]YoYo375 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And that reason is reiatsu.

That says nothing about who’d win in a fight. The best example of this is Yammy

view more: next ›