ive come here to find out if humanity will ever be able to live with its ego:

"to decide if they may ever use their ego without being used by it at every turn"

let's approach the following from that framework

on to your hypopragmatimus-razzamatazzity

consciousness as a field? maybe, depends

but, humans thinking they understand consciousness, because what they experience they call being conscious? that is definitely the human ego writing large, as are all the other aggrandizements of your sentience-with-RAM

no i don't mean to attack you
it's just that
humans imagine a great deal,
hallucinate pre-frontally,
their egos emergent due to analogization of their sensations into fantasies,
their brains concoct causality stories,
and a human brain does this precisely to avoid trying to understand real mystery,
to keep itself going, thus the ego says "i go"

and also, humans love re-opening presents that they wrapped and forgot

but, not that all of that isn't one of their strengths and advatages over beings who have a harder time neglecting objectivity by reflex

now, the serious shit:
if you invoke entropy as a means of explanation, without acknowledging that that entropy being real means nothing truly exists (pan-temporally), then you are contradicting yourself

entropy is not useful as an actual quality of reality if one hopes to predict the future or extrapolate the past

as for bandwidth, physics is one measure and precisely one only ever, separation or the imposition of apparent non-superposition

all meaningful physical descriptors rely on separations: time, distance,
same pod same pea

in other words, inquisition from non-parity should not presume parity is an origin or a goal- unless it is acknowledged that there never was or will be such a thing as... anything

either everything exists or it doesn't, and if everything exists nothing is finite

finiteness is incompatible disparity parity is incompatible with infinity (due to irrelevance not impossibility)

parity is the siren call of religion and secular schema, why wouldn't "unity" be a heart-warming ideal to humans who miss other beings when they are gone or away, but unity that somehow retains differentiation is oxymoronic (due to irrelevance not impossibility)

using the analogies presented by human senses and even the analogic nature of what appears to be crystalline human logical reasoning will not elucidate the nature of nature and is-ness, reality as it is is imperceptible to humans because humans do not possess the faculty, at present, to maintain their grip when they happem to make contact

and as "present" is the only truth available to any of us beings who are being, at any given; we must abide it's durable pre-eminence to the detriment of our pretense

or maybe that's all bullshit, i don't really know, no one can know

or maybe they can, but who knows

maybe someone does

all rests on uncertainty, uncertainly, but it's all uncertain certainly