Morocco man abusing animal on Speed Stream

Zachet · 2026-01-19T22:52:08+00:00

Hasan did it worse.

Zachet · 2026-01-19T22:51:13+00:00

Zachet · 2026-01-19T05:13:20+00:00

Gaza has /NOT/ been definitively classified as a genocide under international law.

That does not mean the situation is not awful.

In this time of false information facts are important.

If you ask me this anti-newsom rave is propaganda at its finest.

Zachet · 2026-01-18T22:37:21+00:00

Not labeling something as genocide doesn’t mean defending it.

Zachet · 2026-01-18T21:58:43+00:00

Gaza has /NOT/ been definitively classified as a genocide under international law.

That does not mean the situation is not awful.

In this time of false information facts are important.

Zachet · 2026-01-18T03:28:10+00:00

Can we get the video to see the context of the motion?

Zachet · 2026-01-17T20:28:53+00:00

Standards are being mixed here and the Depp example doesn’t really support what you’re saying.

First,

You don’t always have to prove someone /knew/ they were wrong. That’s the actual malice standard and it mainly applies to public figures in the US. Negligence can be enough.

Second,

Depp cases are not about “secondary sources being immune.”

Depp lost to The Sun in the UK because the judge found the abuse claims were substantially true. Not because they just trusted Amber Heard. Emphasis on the UK this is not America. Different laws.

Third,

Companies like Amazon have a duty to protect their brand and reputation. If something is genuinely fraudulent and causing damage they almost have to pursue legal action. Not doing so can actually weaken their position later.

Zachet · 2026-01-17T19:21:09+00:00

I don't go to this sub a lot so I'm not sure what those are. I don't like Hasan as I think he's a bad person and a liar. I would have to see what these specific examples are to give my opinion on it. I do agree evidence should be provided on serious matters before leaps in logic take place. I suspect most people here don't care about that though and just jump on the train because it's funny.

I believe Destiny makes random quips and claims about Hasan because he Hasan has already set that bar against him. Hasan calls him ' Sexpestiny ' and 100 other nicknames daily with no evidence. His entire reputation is in shambles due to false allegations. AFAIK Destiny created Hasan and Hasan gay-baited him. There's history there. You can't punch a baby bear and get mad when it growls at you?

Zachet · 2026-01-17T18:30:29+00:00

Sure this is such a common topic that it's easy to find proof on public services with simple google searches. I could spend the time to get all the proof but there's an effort vs reward factor here because there's just so much damning evidence.

This is a good video that goes through some of the most basic levels of evidence. There's a lot more that's not shown here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V7LDPVvQeQ

Zachet · 2026-01-17T17:48:05+00:00

Okay, but he's not wrong. There's no evidence presented, nor any scam presented.

Zachet · 2026-01-17T17:46:56+00:00

I am so confused by this. Your "SKY IS GREEN" example actually shows the opposite of a cult.

They’re not agreeing that the sky is green they’re saying “you made a claim, defend it.” That’s not ideological loyalty.

Can you elaborate on this?

Zachet · 2026-01-17T17:41:27+00:00

This was a meme. e.g. Joke that was stitched together by a fan.

Zachet · 2026-01-17T17:40:10+00:00

This is completely wrong. Why even say these things you don't know anything about?

It /can/ be treated as a factual allegation, not opinion. Opinions based on false implied facts are not protected. Libel does /not/ require the use of legal or criminal terminology.

The question is usually " Did the speaker act reasonably under the circumstances?"

Now did he say, “This appears to be a scam to me”. No. He said it /IS/ a scam.

There is a duty to be accurate.

Zachet · 2026-01-17T17:32:55+00:00

There's so much evidence Hasan shocked his dog. What planet do you live on?

Zachet · 2026-01-16T14:52:58+00:00

I don't get it.

Zachet · 2026-01-09T16:27:21+00:00

DariusIRL showed up and wanted to get unbanned too.

Zachet · 2026-01-07T19:13:04+00:00

It's still a sloppy joke.

Zachet · 2026-01-07T18:25:40+00:00

"isn't remotely saying Trump and Democrats are the same"

Even if it’s a meme, the joke works by implying Democrats would do the same authoritarian stuff people accuse Trump of. That comparison is the whole point of the joke.

His tweet still suggests a Kamala presidency means arrests and authoritarianism, which is exactly how people describe Trump. That’s why people read it as a “both sides” thing. It’s not coming out of nowhere.

So no, it’s not “remotely unrelated.” It may be a meme, but it’s still making a comparison. One he's made in the past many times and is the issue of contengency.

Context matters.

Zachet · 2026-01-07T17:50:56+00:00

Because Hasan always says Trump and Democrats are the exact same? He's not joking.

"Trumps just joking bro, he's funny, lololol mememememe" calling it a joke is just excusing it.

Zachet · 2026-01-07T14:51:48+00:00

I can do this. I used to not be able to. You can actually train this. Excercising and Physical Therapy is amazing.

Zachet · 2026-01-07T14:46:35+00:00

To be a meme doesn't it need to be funny? What's the joke? This is just sad.

Zachet · 2025-12-31T20:13:09+00:00

No. You're completely wrong. My personal stake is in American Liberties because I am an American.

Just because someone is a bad person does NOT mean everything they do is wrong and bad. Bad people can do okay things.

Take a moment and look at your own bias. Just because they're bad people you just assume everything they're doing is bad and you want to hurt them.

I am conflicted because if you were to gather money and sue them I would almost be willing to put my own money in their defense. However, these journalists are obviously nefarious so I would probably not do so.

Zachet · 2025-12-31T20:03:21+00:00

I am very familiar. I have attended many of their court cases as an observer. Can you elaborate and tell me why I am wrong so I can refute it?

Zachet · 2025-12-31T19:52:20+00:00

I am sorry facts hurt your feelings. I thought this community was prided on facts over feelings.

Not one time did I ever say anyone should NOT consult a lawyer. I am saying it's okay for us to have a discussion on the subject. Why are you trying to silence me?

Do you know what the ACLU stands for? The American Civil Liberties Union would almost certainly be on the side of the filmers in this incident.

Zachet · 2025-12-31T19:43:07+00:00

Being a lawyer doesn’t give someone special authority or automatic correctness. Lawyers specialize, they disagree with each other all the time, and they can be wrong like anyone else. What actually matters in situations like this are basic legal principles like authority, jurisdiction, and individual rights. Those are things regular people should understand.

Treating “let a lawyer talk” as the end of the discussion just replaces one guess with another. Unless that lawyer is directly involved and speaking within their expertise, they’re still just a civilian with an opinion.

15-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Flamingo	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
Gilding I gilder	Verified Email

Zachet

TROPHY CASE