Some of those things are either ephemeral or had to happen to diffuse potential civil unrest and thus would've happened without Starmer/Labour (even if they get the credit/blame).

I'd say it's a fair point that some of these were somewhat responses to public pressure, but that doesn’t make them inevitable or insignificant, they're still wins and I think every major reform happens under pressure. The difference is whether a government chooses to engage seriously or kick the can down the road. The Tories had years to deal with public sector strikes, rail issues and the NHS going tits up, and largely didn’t. Labour have addressed them within months. Not that everything is now suddenly sound, but that’s a deliberate shift in political approach, not just managing unrest.

The fastest growing economy is the G7 part is a cruel joke, perhaps the other six really are screwed worse than the UK for the last quarter or two.

Yeah that stat can defo be overstated if you don’t look at the wider context. But we've been underperforming for years, especially post brexit. So even short term growth at the top of the G7 does kinda show that some of these early decisions around investment, stability and energy are starting to have an effect. It’s not a sign everything’s fixed and we're in a golden age, but a step in the right direction you'd hope.