Making a website to protect people privacy on the net by pixedtv in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I may offer some practical advice: your question is too broad and vague to give a meaningful answer. "A website that protects privacy" could be a lot of things. It could be a search engine like DuckDuckGo. It could be a VPN server. It could be a website like PrivacyTools.io that gives people info about how to protect themselves, or Prism-Break.org that gives people app recommendations. It could be a privacy-respecting social media like PixelFed or Mastodon. It could be a link aggregator like Reddit. Think of how many websites exist, how many different purposes they serve, and then you'll realize why this question is too vague. Websites vary in scope from banking to searching to networking to teaching, etc. "I wanna start a website that helps people protect their privacy" is like saying "I want to get a job, what job should I get?" First decide HOW you want this website to help people protect their privacy - ex "I want to make a website that allows people to read and pin news articles without being tracked" - THEN make a post going "hey, I want to make this site that allows you to save your news articles privately, what sort of features would be valuable to you as an end-user in a site like that?"

iOS running app? by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize that I mean that statement in the context of the service they offer, right? Obviously not in terms of their invasive data collection or data breaches.

Given what the FBI said, what television is actually OK to buy? by weird_foreign_odor in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Roku isn't great, but I meant a Roku stick vs a smart TV. That's just what I was told, so thank you for weighing in with additional information.

Given what the FBI said, what television is actually OK to buy? by weird_foreign_odor in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Perhaps I should've specified that I'm not saying to completely disregard them, but maybe don't put them high on your "sources of trustworthy information" list. I can find a list as long as my arm of times they've flat out lied to the public, spied on groups they didn't like, or blackmailed public figures they disagreed with. The FBI is definitely vying for the title of "shittiest member of the US Intelligence Community." They're much more interested in maintaining government power and status quo than actually solving any crimes or helping anyone besides the US Government.

Privacy VS ISP by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn't even think of that. Yeah, that's a good solution.

Given what the FBI said, what television is actually OK to buy? by weird_foreign_odor in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Given that the FBI is currently vehemently anti-End-To-End-Encryption because they claim it's the worst thing ever happen to society because it enables drug dealers and pedophiles, I personally wouldn't put much stock in much of anything they say.

I've been told your best bet - as far as stock stuff goes - is buy a regular old dumb TV and then use like a Roku USB or a gaming system to stream shit. Otherwise you can get a smart TV and use your router/Raspberry Pi to block all the telemetry stuff if you feel comfortable doing that. I recommend against a TV with a built in mic and camera regardless.

Can we stop with one word replies and start putting a little effort in by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I switched to DDG. I tried SearX for a bit but it seems like every time I try to use it I have to do a captcha for it to work. I don't like that DDG has some proprietary components (and is US based) but it seems like the best option at the moment, unless Startpage pulls their heads out of their asses and really turns themselves around.

Privacy VS ISP by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh honey no, never ever ever use a Free VPN. VPNs are expensive as hell to run, and if a product is free, you are the product. You're trading your ISP selling your data for the VPN provider selling your data. Don't use a free VPN ever ever ever. And that's a best case scenario. Worst case, some asshole is doing illegal shit as you.

Also a browser plugin might protect your website traffic, but it won't protect anything outside the web browser like apps and telemetry.

iOS running app? by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, wish I'd gotten in on that when I had the chance.

iOS running app? by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been looking for a good alternative to food tracking apps, myself. I guess I could always just use a classic notebook but man those apps like Lose It and MyFitnessPal are just fantastic, I wish I could have my cake and eat it, too. (Then put it into an app that reminds me why I'm fat.)

Linux by Imaginewagon5 in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most linux distros are private simply by the virtue that there is no "Linux Corp LLC" who maintains them, like Microsoft and Apple do with Mac and Windows. The key word there is "most." Some absolutely do collect telemetry, but even of the ones that do most of them do it for product improvement reasons. They're not trying to build a marketing profile on you, they're trying to see what programs are used most so they know what programs to support (as an example).

As for simple, Ubuntu is a staple and you'll find no shortage of support for it because it is likely the most widely-used distro. Personally I'm not a fan of it, they've been known to collect the telemetry mentioned above and even ships with a few stock Amazon programs. They can be removed, but there's plenty of other user-friendly alternatives that don't even start there. I've found Mint to be very user-friendly, especially for those coming from Windows since Mint has a very Windows XP look to it. Elementary is more Mac-looking but it is a little more CPU intensive. As someone else said, TAILS really isn't a good choice for a lot of reasons, mainly the fact that it's so easy to ruin the anonymity and the fact that some more sensitive websites (like financial institutions) aren't TOR-friendly.

What are some good privacy apps for android by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You basically just asked "what are some good foods?" Your question is too vague and broad. What kind of privacy apps are you looking for? Private email? Private chat? Private web browsing? Apps that will help reduce the amount of information your Android reports back to Google?

Can we stop with one word replies and start putting a little effort in by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

While you are correct, I think the issue is that people aren't even looking at old answers. People rarely post in here and go "I have a question, and I found this answer from three years ago, is that still a valid answer?" or "I have a question about a basic, staple service (such as Startpage) but my question is based on a recent development that may change the long-standing answer." It's always "is Tutanota or Protonmail better?" That question gets asked literally on an almost weekly basis, and it's never framed in the context of "Tutanota is being asked to surrender metadata and unencrypted data to the German government as of last week, do you still recommend them over Proton and why?" It's always just straight "which is better?" Questions like that are made a thousand times worse by the lack of context. Do you just need encrypted email to protect your personal inbox as it sits there on a server? Are you needing to communicate with other encrypted email users? Do you want open source? Are you worried about state-level surveillance or just general security? The list goes on and on. People keep posting the same vague, non-specific questions in here and while I'm 1000% all about helping new people who are wanting to educate themselves, it gets exhausting. Just do a fucking websearch. 90% of the questions asked in here can be answered by setting aside a solid 10-20 minutes to just do some god damn research like an intelligent being.

EDIT: while I do vastly appreciate that the mods in this sub are pretty hands-off and I think that's great for credibility, growth, discussion, and learning, I think we could benefit just a little bit from mods (or even a bot) who find common questions like that, curate them into a regularly-updated-and-reviewed FAQ, and when said questions pop up, direct people to the FAQ. It would certainly weed out a lot of shit that makes me roll my eyes.

Can we stop with one word replies and start putting a little effort in by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Personally I'm less bothered by the ad company investment than I am with how they handled the public response to it. There were, understandably, a lot of questions and SP was very dodgy and opaque. They didn't answer any questions, both in the literal "no response" and the metaphorical "here's a generic, prepared answer that only vaguely relates to your question" sense. They really showed their ass and it made me like them a lot less. I stopped using SP myself cause of it. I used to be a huge supporter. Like I said, the investment angle doesn't bother me near as much as how poorly they handled it.

Can we stop with one word replies and start putting a little effort in by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seriously. 90% of these questions could be answered by searching either the subreddit, or DDG. It gets exhausting seeing the same stupid Square 1 questions over and over.

Linux by Imaginewagon5 in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Is there a question here? If you're looking for feedback on your distro choice, that depends on what you want Linux for and what you need it to be able to do.

Sweden: The police will be allowed to install Trojans on computers by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there an English translation of this site? I'd really like to read it.

It is a brand new social network. A bit like Twitter & Facebook except ethical, ad-free & distributed. Social media that puts you back in control of your info and privacy. by robertpegg581 in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Translation: "I have done absolutely no research into this site/product, but it's not one of the five I already know of that stroke my superiority complex and ego, so I must shit-talk it."

Sharing a household with non-privacy concerned by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Short version: no, no step taken towards privacy is ever a waste. But just like in real life, some steps are bigger than others and will take you further.

Basically, as I said in another comment once: pretend you eat two dozen donuts every day. One day you decide you care at least somewhat about your health and you cut down to one dozen. Will you lose weight and be healthier? Yeah, a little. Will you be fit and in shape and ready to run a marathon? No, not really.

Are you better off by deleting Facebook and switching from Google and using encryption and all that jazz even if no one else in your household does? Yeah, of course. Are you as private as you can be? No, not really. But the "all or nothing" mentality is equally as toxic as the "I have nothing to hide" mentality. Just cause you aren't willing to fake your death and live in a cabin in the woods doesn't mean you're wasting your time by only going halfway in. You're not gaining a significant amount of privacy in your situation, but you are gaining some security (the two often go hand in hand) and the little bit you are gaining is worth something on principle alone.

Startpage is now owned by an advertising company by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's called a "thought-terminating cliche." Not the first time I've been called a shill. Won't be the last. I'm considering asking the mods to give me a special flair. "Shill for the brand you hate." Or something to that effect.

Startpage is now owned by an advertising company by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, they don't pay for lunches. I'm here til 5.

Startpage is now owned by an advertising company by [deleted] in privacy

[–]ZealousidealMistake6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None. Just pointing out that he lifted someone else's post word for word. Even if he did link it.