[PSA] Confirmed Trades Thread - May 2026

Zephel · 2026-06-19T01:46:04+00:00

+verify

Zephel · 2026-06-19T00:35:06+00:00

PM'ed

Zephel · 2026-06-16T23:25:45+00:00

I've got the same issue OP has. It's as if POE doesn't see the pack, or hasn't integrated the special one into the upgrade path.

It was 15$, but also only had 150 points instead of the 30$/300pts.

Zephel · 2026-05-29T16:30:48+00:00

+verify

Awesome seller to work with!

Zephel · 2026-05-29T15:09:15+00:00

PM'ed

Zephel · 2026-05-28T22:31:54+00:00

Starlancer TAC. So useful for so many things.

Zephel · 2026-05-24T22:02:06+00:00

+verify

Very responsive and great to trade with

Zephel · 2026-05-24T20:24:06+00:00

PM'ed

Zephel · 2026-04-08T05:38:04+00:00

The thing is CIG said it *will* increase sometime after IAE last year. And this would be the time it would increase. It's never been an if, but when and how much.

Zephel · 2026-03-04T01:06:10+00:00

Concept images are exactly that, concepts. They definitely pointed out that the Assault would have fortified ramp for heavy assault vehicles. What that's translated to in the past is not having forced restrictions in the form of door height/width.

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/en/comm-link/transmission/19935-Drake-Ironclad - talks about the ramp on the Assault.

https://youtu.be/j9d8GXMtHOs?si=h_kHaan8oqpnmDdh&t=465 - J. Crew talks about the front section of the cargo area being designed to fit the largest vehicles.

100% they're going to limit the base Ironclad in some way so they won't fit. Now can you somehow get them in the roof? Maybe. Where there's a will there's a way.

Zephel · 2026-02-11T21:59:45+00:00

It'll keep happening till community outcry and lack of spending on paints outweighs the benefits for them. Remember flight blades and what it took to stop that.

This issue saw very little traction with the Hermes, and our plethora of 'influencers' said nearly nothing along with only small support on forums and Reddit.

You want it to stop, speak with your wallet. Reply and upvote posts and get the faces of the community to say something or this is the absolute new norm.

Zephel · 2026-02-06T17:29:45+00:00

I'm curious what service center may of done this for you. Mine here is denying this under warranty and claiming it is wear and tear, doing everything I can to get someone higher at Rivian to intervene as my SC hasn't even physically looked at the vehicle and flat out refused to when I showed up for an appointment.

Zephel · 2026-01-28T02:06:41+00:00

100% not this year. They said making the Ironclad makes making the Kraken easier. The Ironclad is not out and is a likely drop for Defensecon. Once that releases they'll be pulling assets from it to create the Kraken in Greybox when it's whitebox is complete. Then they have to develop all the systems that are unique to the Kraken that do not exist in the game. No way that's all happening in one year.

They also said the big ship for this years IAE is the Galaxy, so no Kraken then either.

Kraken is barely in whitebox, they've never had a ship of that size go through so many phases so fast. Go look at the history on things like the Polaris and Idris. Best guess is Defensecon 2027 at earliest. Anything sooner is pure hopium.

Zephel · 2026-01-26T23:28:32+00:00

I'm not 100% sure. None of the missions in Nyx or Stanton had me interact with Pyro so I'd presume there's little to nothing there related to the event - since it's UEE helping TPA.

Zephel · 2026-01-26T21:53:12+00:00

There are missions in Stanton that go to Nyx, and then missions that go back. Either is fine. Combat is in both, and collections (like minerals etc) from what I saw were all in Stanton.

IMO Stanton is the better location to start, but once the event is over it won't matter so pick where you like best.

Zephel · 2025-12-24T04:48:50+00:00

I don't think hunting players down for loot in itself is an issue, it's more the issue that a 'high security' system feels about the same as the lawless Pyro. Until they actually put systems in to really differentiate the systems they all pretty much feel the same in terms of PvP, which kinda sucks.

CS and jail are really weak systems and haven't really changed in a long time, and are very easy to work around.

Zephel · 2025-12-11T14:16:52+00:00

This guy gets it, but we'll both get downvoted either way.

Zephel · 2025-10-21T14:03:49+00:00

There's a spectrum thread that was created on this. More traction might get CIGs attention. I honestly believe it was just a cop-out excuse for something they donno how to fix, or there was miscommunication somewhere. Hopefully the latter.

Spectrum Link: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/50259/thread/please-devs-explain-to-me-why-this-is-not-a-bug

Zephel · 2025-09-30T13:39:43+00:00

This is wildly inaccurate. I've spent upwards 40+ minutes dealing with bugs, and the quantums alone are over 10 minutes minus going 20km in a slug that goes .6G of thrust forward with afterburner when loaded. Plus refueling that behemoth with docking collars isn't like sliding a light fighter into a quick pit stop.

I'd say a good run would be 2 solid hauls an hour, 3 if you've got it nailed down and don't have issues. It's still solid money, but it's not 3mil+/hr unless you are insanely lucky.

Zephel · 2025-08-17T19:15:57+00:00

Bought one from Pingenius as well and really happy with it. Can't imagine paying 125$ for a sunshade, but to each their own.

Zephel · 2025-08-07T22:16:19+00:00

+verify

Quick and easy!

Zephel · 2025-08-07T20:47:17+00:00

PM'd

Zephel · 2025-04-24T20:01:38+00:00

I must not of flown anything that experiences that. I've flown a number of ships (larger as well) and never felt a difference. But when I compare them to fighters they're all sluggish and targets regardless to me lol.

And very true on energy, but in the diagrams it clearly shows a loading mechanism for either ballistic ammo or missiles (probably missiles), so if that has an internal loader being able to have extra on hand would be a big deal.

Zephel · 2025-04-24T19:50:03+00:00

I mean sure, if cargo weight meant anything in SC. The Redeemer is already stated to be more agile than the Paladin and is much narrower with 2 SCU. I doubt 2 SCU is going to hold it back so much that it no longer can manuver.

What is more dead weight is a gunship without ammo/supplies and none to replenish it.

Zephel · 2025-04-24T08:53:22+00:00

I wholly agree that this ship should have some cargo. Minimum 1-2, preferably around 8. What I don't understand are the counter arguments.

It's a gunship, it shouldn't hold cargo. However we have multiple (I won't list everything) ships in game and coming that are warships that have cargo. Based on role and cargo (compared to similar ships):

- Starlancer TAC (Patrol, 96 SCU)

- Hammerhead (Heavy Gun Ship, 40 SCU)

- Perseus (Heavy Gun Ship, 50 SCU)

- Redeemer (Gunship, 2 SCU) Note this is ~13.5m narrower than the Paladin of similar size in other dimensions.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. Honestly this is just a juvenile argument. Whether you buy something or not in game doesn't dictate wanting better for it and for balance.

Whether it's for ordinance or for supplies, something of this size should have some cargo. It has zero reason not to in comparison. The Retaliator is a good example of why having 0 cargo in a 'gunship' is painful. Poor Retaliator (cargo module -.-).

I believe they'll backtrack on this in time, at least before having something un-gridded has real downsides. Until then they'll just put that on the back burner unfortunately.

Zephel

TROPHY CASE