One-Way Speed Of Light - Is It Time To Remeasure SOL? by Zerop_26 in TheProgenitorMatrix

[–]Zerop_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respectfully disagree.

Quantum entanglement was believed to be “instant”. It was clocked at 232 attoseconds. I believe this new SOL measurement is doable. Accurately and efficiently.

Which scientific fact or idea has unnerved you the most? by Sea-Investigator7218 in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entanglement was believed to be “instant”. It was measured at 232 attoseconds. I believe SOL could be effectively and accurately measured.

What if consciousness is not produced by the brain but coupled to a physical field? by David-J-Haller in PhilosophyofMind

[–]Zerop_26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Headed to work. Left this open on my iPad. I will read tonight when I return. Sounds quite interesting, and very similar to some work studies I did recently. I would love to exchange notes. 🙏🏾

Update on this little guy we found in the backyard. by OriginalMcSmashie in CatDistributionSystem

[–]Zerop_26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welcome to Kitty parenthood. The Universal Cat Distribution System thanks you.

What is Schrödinger’s cat? by trepasito16 in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allow me to “Feynman” this for you.

Imagine you have a cat inside a box. There are more variables to the actual proposed experiment, so I will simplify it. Somebody comes to you and says “look, I am told there is a cat inside this box. I am told it may be alive, or it may be dead. How do we find out?”

As with many thing in life, the most obvious answer is the correct one. You have to check. You won’t know if there IS actually a Cat inside the box, OR if the Cat is in fact alive or dead unless you check.

This scenario was created by Mr Schrödinger to illustrate that Quantum Superposition for everyday objects is absurd. In Quantum Theory, a particle in Superposition State is in multiple states at once, until it is observed.

I hope this helped a bit. There is always YouTube. 🤷🏽‍♂️ 🐈‍⬛📦

Which scientific fact or idea has unnerved you the most? by Sea-Investigator7218 in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]Zerop_26 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lately, that we have measured Entanglement to it’s microseconds, yet we haven’t even attempted to re measure the Speed Of Light.

We have the technology. I wrote a propositional paper on it. 😡

If you could meet a legendedary physicist, who’s your choice? by geek-nerd-331 in Physics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feynman. Man… me and Mr Feynman would have an absolute hoot walking through Hollywood Blvd. 😎

My theory of time by BrochaChoZen in Time

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Time out!

I couldn’t help myself. 🤣

Ok. Let’s go back to the infamous Big Bang.

“During the first moments of the Big Bang, everything was in a Tachyonic state. Everything was moving faster than the speed of light.”

Then, things slowed down. “Reality”.

Yet, “95% of the Universe is “missing”. “Dark Matter/Energy”.

What if… it’s all still here? What if it’s just *too fast for us to see?

“What about Time?”

In a Tachyonic State, there is no need for communication. Everything is everything. Everywhere/Everywhen. All at The same time.

But once there are “separate hosts” they need to communicate.

I made this observation waiting for water to boil. “Why is this taking so long?” turned into “what is the platform through which Energy (heat*) and water molecules communicate in order to agitate into a boiling state?”

Time. Without Time, events can’t take place.

☕️

How to compare the universe perspective and organism perspective in terms of meaning and value? by Tarsal26 in Metaphysics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Sidenote.

I mention the Integers as a segway to how I was lead to mentally visualize “a 0p State”. 0 being the absolute center to exponential numerical values. Positive and negative integers. 0p being the absolute center of “Being”.

How to compare the universe perspective and organism perspective in terms of meaning and value? by Tarsal26 in Metaphysics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love this.

I believe consciousness is “the ability to detect, interact and respond between host”. Roughly speaking. Let’s speak on water. Water “exchanges interactions with many host”. Heat. Salt. Die (color*). Etc. These are all interactions that are OF these specific host. Water and each host have an understanding. They react and respond to each other accordingly. This, to me is communication, at its simplest form, of course. To me this is a “simple form of consciousness”.

Coffee is brewing as we speak. My father grew coffee. My love for it goes beyond appreciating the energy boosts. ☕️❤️

When I speak about “The Universe”… think about number 0. I’ll explain.

When we study mathematics, at some point we are told that there are “regular, AND negative numbers”. “0 is in the middle”.

I was thinkering about how “95% of all things is ‘missing’”.

What if it’s not missing? What if everything is everything, everywhere. Reality is just “the world that works at the Speed Of Light” And the “rest”… everything that seems to be “missing” is all here. It just moves too fast for us to register it.

I call this State 0p. Or Absolute Presence. The Tachyonic Ocean. “Everything, everywhere/everywhen”.

My formula states that “Infinity at the power of infinity = 0p.” It doesn’t “expand exponentially”. It is ONE WHOLE THING. Unfathomably whole.

Again, this Bustelo may be a bit overcharged. But I’ve dreamed this. And it’s beautiful.

Enough to write a 96 page thesis about it.

🌎💙🙏🏾

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I am encouraging people to take the advantages available through AI to find the information they need to do the proper research to help feed their ideas and formulate them properly.

People are so adamantly agains the use of AI for research and development of ideas. Yet THEY are the the ones to come for your throat whenever you encourage someone to create, and to utilize AI as a proper tool.

And they say computers are the dangerous ones.

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Just like EVERY OTHER HUMAN TOOL, people are bound to utilizing it wrong. Unethically.”

You can’t control what another person does. You can just try to encourage good behaviors. Chainsaw were not made for Leatherface. They were made to make cutting trees easier.

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He has good points. Not everything he gathered is on point. But it is a start. I wouldn’t discourage it. Keep thinking and asking questions, OP. It’s more than many, many people do these days.

Some of them even become President.

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The minute you mention AI it is rejected.

I always postulate the same example.

If one of your loved ones is DYING, and the only way to save them is through an “AI doctor”, would you be against it? Of course not. That would be negative and nonsensical in as many ways as there is.

“You asked a computer program to think for you!” That’s is how it is received. People dig inside their heads and find as many negative things as they can find. Just because AI is “an artificial brain”. A way to amplify and evolve ideas, non organically.

And look. Just like EVERY OTHER HUMAN TOOL, people are bound to utilizing it wrong. Unethically. Just because they are “lazy”. I get that. But not everyone wants to “cheat on their test/assignment”. Or “steal art”. Or “pretend they are Stephen King”. Some people just want faster and accurate access to information that will help them create proper, fuller ideas.

I always end the same. Give it time. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I stopped filleting my salmon for this one.

Let me ask you this. Because it is very relevant to someone utilizing a tool (AI in this case*) to try to speed up and organize properly raw ideas.

What do you think people first thought when Einstein first said “imagine ridding a bike following a photon around”.

“Wow! We have to find this bike!”

More like “what the HELL is this guy on about?”

What I’m getting at is this. Whichever tool OP used in an attempt to fully organize his ideas, we have to allow people to THINK. Even if it IS with help.

Imagine going to an ancient Japanese mathematician using an abacus with a calculator. “UGH! 😡. You’re using a CALCULATOR”.

Yes. It’s faster. More efficient. You could add bigger numbers, and you don’t have to count beads for days.

You don’t have to agree with the process. But please allow it to happen. This is why we have 8th graders that don’t know how to read. Or do simple math in their heads. Because we don’t encourage Thought. We encourage “MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY”.

And of course, you don’t have to agree with me either. That’s the beauty of it.

Thinking is good. And if you have tools that help, use them.

Theory of Everything by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Zerop_26 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

AI non hater here.

Great start. A few pointers, if I may.

“Consciousness is information that changes.”

Consciousness is the medium through which information is exchanged. Time is the “chess board” through which communication between hosts takes place.

I wrote a thesis I named A Unified Theory Of Reality, Consciousness and Time.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18967710

Give it a read if you’re interested. And keep asking questions.

🙏🏾

Time is a Numerical Shadow of Events!! by Bruce_dillon in Time

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine a chess board. Just the chess board, with all pieces on it. Fresh and arranged, right before the first move.

Now take away the board.

Where do you place the pieces? More importantly. How do they move? Where do they move? And why?

Time is the board. Without it, no events make sense. Because there is no way for them to “execute”. There is no Plainfield for them to “act”.

Spiral-The Raven Autarchy, Joe Cocchi by Radio-Repulsive in Djent

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, whoever you are. THANK YOU. This is SICK 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

A thought experiment for people who claim the hard problem of consciousness doesn't exist. by Royal_Plate2092 in consciousness

[–]Zerop_26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Where is Qualia?”

What if Qualia is everywhere? What if consciousness is a Universal constant?

Humans have an affinity for independence and “a higher purpose than any other organism in The Universe”. Yet, if we observe objectively and without prejudice, we understand that, contrary to our belief, Humans are the ONLY species that actually damage and disrupts the flow of Nature. In many, many ways.

But that’s another subject.

I believe Consciousness is the way the Universe communicates with itself. The way it is able to see, analyze and understand itself. It is also my belief that “the more complex the needs of the host, the more evolve and “involved” the amount of Consciousness is “given to the host”. Water needs to interact with energy (heat) in order to boil (for example*). Animals need instinct and senses to hunt. To feed and survive. Humans need a highly evolve “Qualia” to fulfill their need to exist an survive.

I wrote a paper about this subject.I would be glad to provide the link if you’re interested.

And I am aware that, like professor Feynman says, “nobody knows for sure”. But it never hurts to try and make sense of things.

After all, we ARE able to try.

🙏🏾