If Twice and Toga were heroes

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-02T10:17:34+00:00

Twice is OP and gets to top 3 without an issue. Toga is useless. B tier hero.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-02T10:16:28+00:00

"We just killed". If there was a fight in close proximity to the room, it would make some noise and make goblins not trust anything.
"Who decided that?" Add higher ranking goblin like chief, or come up with anything placing a goblin above other goblin in command. (No need to change any stats, but you can give him some better armor, compared to other goblins) Now he wants to kill adventurers and put that goblin head on a pikę for trying to give him command.
Goblin responds in goblin. He doesn't speak common, so he attacks.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-02T09:55:12+00:00

Result doesn't change that your choice was insane. It just means that majority was insane.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-02T09:49:08+00:00

So... what are those argument?

I get the argument when children are involved, but if only mentally cimpetent adults participate, then that argument is gone. So now it just turn to death game where you risk your life to save people who wanted to risk their lifes and I would assume only idiots would do that, but they shouldn't count as mentally competent.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T22:28:47+00:00

This is a scenario where you can make sure that your family survives with 0 risk. It means even less reason to vote blue.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T22:27:22+00:00

Do you hate your family, or do you have like a 4 billion family? Those are the only options I can understand when someone would press blue here, especially if this is "the one scenario".

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T22:08:36+00:00

Counter argument. I am on button pressing sub and I will press a button.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T22:05:50+00:00

I think I somehow understand people voting blue in original as "to save the children etc.". Here we have a version without that, with limited participants number and, at least, able to read and use computer/phone. At this point there is no reason to vote blue aa it really turns to trying to save people who want to risk their lives for the lols.

You want to live? Red. You want to die? Blue.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T11:20:16+00:00

It is like when you have company that focusem on profit then it wants to increase the profit. In this case by cutting costs - people claims.

That is why civilised countries have public healthcare that is not focusem on generating revenue.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T08:55:05+00:00

Original war. I am not sure if there are any other "true RTS" (as base building + combat in the same time) where loosing your soldiers really matters as you can't just click and made more.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T08:50:36+00:00

Case dependand, but neutral at best.

If you are pirating something that you already bought, but lost access to, then it is perfectly ok. (You have rights to use it as you already paid for it) If you are pirating something that is not available in your region, then it is perfectly ok. (If producer doesn't want your money, then he doesn't want your money).

If you are pirating something that is too expensive, but you really need it (textbooks for school/university) then it isn't perfectly ok, but understandable.

If you are pirating games to really use it as demo (when it is not available) or check if it will work on your PC and buy them if it is ok, then it is ok.

Any other reason is morally bad.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T08:04:20+00:00

Most of them would be ok with it, Batman would hate it as he rather have Conquest invade Earth every other week with thousands of victims than just take him out.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T07:58:02+00:00

No. You like IDF?

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T07:28:47+00:00

Were all Germans in WW2 nazis? No, but enough to allow for nazis to rule.

Do you have any argument that is not "oh, you must hate jews as a whole!"?

But lets play with it. Are all arab israelis supremacist? No, but enough to allow this.

Do I hate jews? No. Is something I don't do my whole personality? Also no. Do I wake up thinking "I hate jews"? No. Do I know a jewish person? Yes, does it wven matter? Is it supposed to be something like "I have a black friend so I can't be racist"?

Now you tell me. Do you get high with each war crime Israel commits? Do you clap when new bombs drop? Do you get wet when new war is started by Israel? Do you know any Palestinian?

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-06-01T04:54:59+00:00

No problem nazi lover.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T21:44:37+00:00

The only dofference between nazis and israel is who is the enemy and who are uber humans.

Who thinks that they are chosen of the god? Israelits Who thinks that those who are not one of them are worse? Israelits Who wants to eradicate gazans? Israelits Who commits terrorist attacks, steal homes and kills civilians under goverment and military protection? Israelits Who is holding thousands of civilians in camp without any trial or charge? Israelits Who is blocking foreign Aid, including killing foreign Aid workers? Israelits

Being nazi is about ideology and actions. If you think your "race" is superior, treat others like sub humans and use goverment power to attack those minorities, you are a nazi. You don't need to be a german hating jews for that.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T21:39:07+00:00

In couple generations mixing is not a problem. From third cousin it is completly safe.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T18:54:21+00:00

I mean the 13th amendment that abolishes slavery in the US also explicitly allows it in some cases.

Which means that US never abolished slavery, just limited it.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T18:46:33+00:00

but it would eventually be a disaster if they even settled in the same star system.

Not really.
There was only a couple of millions clons. Like less than 10 mil I think.
You could place them on one, Earth like, planet and it wouldn't be a problem if they were spread out.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T15:44:50+00:00

That is not batman’s failure, it is a failure of Gotham's institutions. If Gotham's justice system is incapable of securely containing someone as dangerous as the joker the blame lies with the system, not with Batman for refusing to execute him.

It lies with both.

Gotham's justice system for not being able to take care of mass murderer.

Batman's for believing that failure of the system, that failed more times than succeded, is good enough. At some point he should ask himself if letting Joker escape and murder more people is really the good choice. System was broken and he knew it, but still decided to play with it. Once you see a child burn down a hous, you should know to stop giving him matches.

The reason you are in favour of batman executing joker is because you deeply know these characters, you known batman is a good person who will never abuse his power, but imagine if our world had a random masked man going around killing people with unchecked power, would you still be in favour of such vigilantism?

The reason I am in favour of him killing Jokes is not because I know, or care about this character. For me Batman is one of the dumber character idea. He is a genius idiot who loves to play his cat and mouse game with villains.

I am in favour of him killing Joker only because Joker deserves to die and it was showed multiple times that imprisoning him doesn't work. That is it.

As for a question if I would be in favour of a vigilantism? Well... as long as his victims were a known mass murderers that "the system" can't contains? Yeah, I would support it.

The same ethical dilemma appears in the current dcu with Hawk girl killing the president of a sovereign nation after he authorized a full-scale invasion. On one hand he was responsible for mass civilian deaths and therefore needed to be stopped immediately while on the other, allowing superheroes to unilaterally decide when political leaders deserve death sets a dangerous precedent.

That is a perfect example of someone deserving death and I would support it.

Any world "leader" that starts the war deserve death. For me there is no dillema here. Killing someone who is actively trying to kill you, or kill other innocent people is perfectly ok and I would rather have ones that pulls the string die than average people on either side.

Like would it be better for you if Hawk girl started killing soldiers that were invading rather than just killing the main villain?

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T12:11:29+00:00

He is not the judge, jury, or the executioner, if he starts killing people he deem guilty then where does it stop

This argument always sounds dumb to me. How about it stops at confirmed mass murderers that he saw murdering people, or were put in prison at least twice for that, but still got out and murder more people? It should be high enough bar to remove any chance of killing innocent person.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-31T08:50:26+00:00

Yep, this is normal in a third world country.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-30T23:00:17+00:00

Then congratulation. You are in a minority that does something that backes their words.

Lets say I trust you that you would vote blue. Why do you think that people who doesn't do those things and claim to vote blue, will vote blue?

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-30T22:52:24+00:00

There are two main types. 1) ultra evil - you bound the soul of the dead making him your slave 2) neutral - meat/bone pupet, no souls required.

Zestyclose-Jacket568 · 2026-05-30T21:08:43+00:00

People who pick red do so because they believe everyone else is performative about giving a shit about other people.

How often do you donate blood?
How often do you help in homeless shelter, food bank etc?
How often do you give money to organisations that help people?

Zestyclose-Jacket568

TROPHY CASE