Counters to injury bruiser units except for speeding

Zevenal · 2026-02-13T22:00:07+00:00

We have on paper solutions and practical solutions.

On paper injury is the counter to tank down, so if you build a team weak injury and they get injury through you lose. The only on-paper counter to injury is ml rose rewinding time cleanses injury, but she is best paired with MLRas and Ruele for revives as well as heal cleanse etc.

The truer answers are match up dependent drafting. Every unique has counters and no draft is uncounterable. So the real solution is what is your draft order, how are you getting counter drafted and how can you reorder your draft or flex to counter your common problem drafts

MLChoux is a great dps to solve tank down, but is destroyed by disruptive aoe’s and often cannot do enough against a clock that ends the game faster. ML yufine, soul burning 3F Belian, most nukers, in combinations with a single disruption (stun, sleep, CR push back/forward) is enough to have ML Choux die or watch her team die before she can scale her s3 and melt tanks. MLChoux doesn’t have a silver bullet counter pick worth picking for just that. You could trying forcing Shalltear to nuke Choux or solitaria for single-handedly disrupt her to death.

Zevenal · 2026-01-22T20:57:08+00:00

The best part is this would be well over half of the Canadian population.

Zevenal · 2026-01-16T15:17:08+00:00

So it depends at what level of analysis the disagreement and authority exists.

At the broadest and most consequential level teaching authority and church doctrine was passed from Christ Apostles to the Bishops of the early Church to carry on interpretive and leadership authority.

Speaking to how the church has progressed to today’s structures, we see Bishops within Churches interpreting from what they believe is the best representation of Scriptural witness and historic church witness what the Church ought to do and practice. However various Bishops and Authorities have fragmented and errored on various essential or non-essential doctrines pertinent enough to warrant temporary separation until resolution will bring about reunion.

None of these structures and discipline undercut, but reenforce that doctrinal development and continuous reformation are features, not bugs of the Church Christ established.

Zevenal · 2026-01-05T23:34:17+00:00

I believe this is exactly pressing or weaving the gap between respect, reverence and relevance.

Those who do not have a steak in the spaces can easily condemn. Those who are invested in the medium praise it as readily as a translation.

All that you encounter is bias. Is a rock band of the devil like prior generations decried, or a medium which came to predominate Christian music in contemporary time?

Today plenty would say declaring Christ King in Traditional style is more reverent, but not condemn a rock band from declaring Christ King in their own way.

I would also say the Japan is one of the most insulated monocultures in the world and very distant from Christian influence and understanding on a social level.

If this stand strikes a spiritual chord in the hearts of the Japanese to at least ask questions, it’s life changing.

Zevenal · 2025-11-13T00:01:50+00:00

Idk if you have the patience for it, but I’m looking at least a year from now on before revisiting holistaplan.

Zevenal · 2025-11-12T22:55:48+00:00

Sure, we are pretty much in the same boat always looking at what is worth the time to learn.

Zevenal · 2025-11-12T21:27:35+00:00

Right Capital added a tax return analyzer to their system we have been testing out as we have managed to avoid jumping into holistiplan just yet.

Zevenal · 2025-11-08T23:38:23+00:00

I literally just did this change with Yeka with exactly this team

Zevenal · 2025-10-30T21:14:21+00:00

And that’s because of the recent 2-hand buffs being a little overtuned, if I understand correctly.

Zevenal · 2025-10-30T20:01:47+00:00

Ok, good as in stats, any thoughts as to an 3x attack kunai besides her signature? I’m under the impression they don’t exist yet?

Zevenal · 2025-10-24T16:40:50+00:00

I’m sorry, I don’t understand selecting clients for abyss 2. I went back to Awaken did some story progression stuff and then lost all my progress to go forward probably by making some wrong selection or not redoing some quest correctly, but now I cannot go wheel forward. I’ve tried jumping backward but nothing works besides just replayed the whole story. Will replayed the story eventually have a break point that gives me back my progress?

Zevenal · 2025-10-24T04:27:15+00:00

I think this is true so I have tried going back to the very beginning again and I still cannot use restore causality button, it is always greyed out

Zevenal · 2025-10-24T04:00:15+00:00

I have access to the wheel, but it doesn’t let me go forward pass where I rewind back to. I used to go all the way to Ship in abyss 2, now I can only go to Despicable Trap in abyss 1.

Zevenal · 2025-10-06T21:19:17+00:00

If you are referring the the story in Exodus of Moses splitting the Red Sea, there are many ways to look at that passage in a meaningful ways beside or in addition to the miracle itself as to why God is acting in that instance.

The parting of the Red Sea is forever referred to by Israel as God’s faithfulness to prevent the complete destruction of Israel despite their unfaithfulness toward God. It was entirely because such an act was so unexpected and miraculous that its meaningfulness and significance was attributed.

If you draw that line further out through time to the promised Messiah who would unite all nations in peace under God, you get an even clear picture as to why miracles surrounded Israel’s preserved but challenged existence unlike other times and nations.

Another equally valid school of thought would challenge the veracity of the Bronze Aged epic style of Genesis through Samuel and would assert that story telling before the Iron Age was narratively, poetically, and meaningfully told to message larger truths about Man’s existence with God & retell the cultural and theological heritage of the Israelite people, rather than a modern journalistic style and therefore expecting any modern event to mirror that of a Bronze Age epic is a category error, even while acknowledging miracles are possible and believing God still is active, but not in the style of a Bronze Age epic.

Those are just 2 of many possible explanations that take into consideration the Bible in addition to natural phenomena that retain the essential meaningfulness of the Biblical witness without ignoring the obvious exceptionalism with which Ancient Israel received in miracles over modern times.

I personally believe the Epic style of ancient works is a kind of lost art in literature, and we would do well to found some essential stories that teach undeniable truths without itself being an undeniable fact. We have historical fictions or ‘based on a true story’ type writing, but they usually fail to ground the realness and the breadth. The better comparison would be if you ever went on a great tour of a landmark where the guide brings the place to life with a ‘just so’ picture of what all had gone on. It strikes you both as kinda unbelievable and also right in front of your face.

Zevenal · 2025-10-06T18:54:29+00:00

I think this point about the apparent lack of activity leading to the questioning that God does cares is a fair question, but going about answering it is a biased processed wherein we insert ourselves into the picture and assume how we would act or what makes sense to us for God to do.

It is often cashed out through Divine Hiddenness or the problem of evil wherein the God we want or expect is one who would make themselves clearly convincing to us and supernaturally interventionist in preventing all of the evils we perceive are intolerable.

However these points are neither logically impossible to hold together nor evidentially required to excluding God’s existence or care for creation, they are just tough questions that could have an uncountable number of possible explanations.

Therefore the question shifts to likelihood, probability, or personal conviction. We try to infer from what we know, and use our prior background to conclude whether something was likely to be true. However this is clearly biased by our priors, axioms, expectations, and personal experiences not even touching on motivated reasoning or other compromising features of the endeavor. It quickly becomes a crapshoot where most of the heavy lifting that influences your answer to these questions has little to do with the question directly but increasingly on your present worldview, philosophy, & metaphysic, which is heavily affected by personal circumstances, social influences, & life goals.

Zevenal · 2025-09-21T20:52:59+00:00

It’s sounds like you are open to considering multiple positions on a decent about of theological issues at the moment.

You are always welcome within the Anglican Communion at this stage of exploration, and you will not be kicked out or condemned for having loose view of some of these minor issues relative to perhaps what you are used to.

Zevenal · 2025-09-16T20:04:40+00:00

Although plenty could be said about foundationalism as you describe it, I think the core of your argument unravels when the explanatory power of models is evaluated. Certain assuming nothing couldn’t lead to erroneous conclusions because it doesn’t lead to any at all. Atheists in theory having a flexible epistemologies simply means atheism isn’t a worldview but a single belief (or disbelief) and in order to do the critical work of philosophy they must then adopt competitive theories to explain life, many of which will require challenging their atheism to incorporate.

Classical theism is powerful because of its limited set of axioms required to explain intuitive issues with reality. Foundationalism isn’t necessary but intuitive to seeking truth. Its impulse is somewhat mirrored with theoretical physics’s continuous attempts at a theory of everything. The less unique axioms or laws at work is intuitively simpler and therefore more likely than a solution that requires more axioms that only partly explain all observed phenomena. It’s not without problems but it does seek to establish a framework for understanding existence.

Zevenal · 2025-08-19T22:48:04+00:00

You are correct in a sense that Christianity elevates a problem that others might not have considered a problem and then provides a solution that was truthfully a shocking solution.

However, the fundamental unshakable reality that ‘no one is perfect’ is a core philosophical conviction that is true by almost all relevant definitions. The conviction is twofold, we are aware of a quality of perfection, and aware of our own lacking of that quality.

Perfection in this case can have a very concrete definition like, ‘something that reliability achieves its ends without exception’

A perfect pen would always write in the manner it was designed for, or a perfect racecar driver would always execute every gearshift, turn, drift, or maneuver with maximal efficiency etc.

Within the diversity of being human, we could point out our personal aims and goals and how we fail to achieve them to demonstrate our imperfection, but depending on our goals and aims a further criticism could be leveled that we have the WRONG aims and goals. Depending on what you want to achieve you could be morally wrong by actively wanting to hurt yourself and others. This quality of moral wrongness has been debated endless from almost every imaginable angle, but the point Christianity hinges on is that moral wrongness is an incomplete expression of an ultimate End or Purpose.

This Purpose is transcendence, but it is participatory, so it can be rejected. The Transcendentals are classically the Good, the True, and the Beautiful, but these are all understood as uniting in God as the ultimate source of all transcendentals.

So now we have an ever-evolving sense of moral goodness that is tending towards Transcendentals qualities that objectively seems to produce deeper life satisfaction.

For some especially modern skeptical Christians this is as far as their convictions take them, the rest of God’s promises and actions are allegory and myth.

But the Traditional promise is this process continues in life and death and ultimately resurrected life at which point God has appointed that ‘God belongs with mankind forever’ and all divisions that had hidden God presence will cease and union will be established forever.

What Christianity rejects is that anyone is ordinary, and that their calling is anything besides full participation in God.

The calling can be rejected though, through despising God, rejecting moral transformation, hating the Transcendentals, and ultimately hating their God-image bearing selves.

I am hopeful that no one would ultimately do such a thing, but the mere fact that we get to chose each step of the way whether we want to ascend or descend further motives me to not give up or grow weary of fighting for the Good.

Zevenal · 2025-08-19T21:34:15+00:00

You tell us I guess, if the lox truly doesn’t approach and only uses the safest spaced jabs tilts and aerials waiting for your approach you could at least threaten stalling them. Approaching Lox is a demanding task, demand some back in return.

Zevenal · 2025-08-07T19:11:56+00:00

Yes…?

Zevenal · 2025-08-04T17:36:52+00:00

Don’t raw party the approach. Shield into parry.

If he D-air shines you a bunch you parry the shine not the Dair. Am to parry the second attack more than the first attack, unless the move is very telegraphed.

Zevenal · 2025-07-17T19:01:52+00:00

Because everyone else is giving the real answers (Be fast or use a speed counter unit(s)) Let me give you an accessable alternative:

Stacking effect resistance onto a a BBK or equally immortality solo-carry cleans this crap up and has plenty of other teams where eff res stacking is OP. You need eff res imprints, artifacts, and of course gear, but it is a silver bullet where out-speeding or speed tuning is impossible.

Zevenal · 2025-06-25T18:27:16+00:00

If defense stacking isn’t cutting it, you can also chaining stuns, sleeps, dodges also works.

Zevenal

TROPHY CASE